Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE WHY: –GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW –CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: *OCCURS INFREQUENTLY *SHORT DURATION.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE WHY: –GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW –CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: *OCCURS INFREQUENTLY *SHORT DURATION."— Presentation transcript:

1 EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE WHY: –GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW –CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: *OCCURS INFREQUENTLY *SHORT DURATION –AT HIGH STAGES A DIFFERENT CONTROL MAY EXIST (FLOODPLAIN, DIFFERENT ROUGHNESS) WHERE: –EXTRAPOLATION AT STATE DATA PROCESSING CENTRE OHS - 1

2 HIGH FLOW EXTRAPOLATION METHODS: –DOUBLE LOG PLOT METHOD –STAGE-AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY METHOD –THE MANNING’S EQUATION APPROACH –THE CONVEYANCE SLOPE METHOD OHS - 2

3 DOUBLE LOG PLOT METHOD CONDITIONS: –HYDRAULIC AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS DO NOT CHANGE BEYOND MEASURED RANGE IMPLICATION: –POWER TYPE RATING CURVE FITTED TO THE LAST (HIGHEST) SEGMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED APPLICABLE TO EXTRAPOLATED RANGE AS WELL OHS - 3

4 X-SECTION KHAMGAON, 1997 OHS - 4

5 OHS - 5

6 STAGE-AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY METHOD USE: –TO EXTRAPOLATE RATING CURVE BEYOND MEASURED RANGE BASED ON: *MEASURED STAGE-X-SECTIONAL AREA RELATION *EXTRAPOLATED STAGE-VELOCITY PLOT NOTE: –ASSUMPTION IS THAT STAGE-VELOCITY PLOT CAN EASILY BE EXTRAPOLATED SINCE RATE OF INCREASE OF VELOCITY AT HIGHER STAGES DIMINISHES RAPIDLY –FROM A HYDRAULIC POINT OF VIEW ASSUMPTION DOUBTFULL SINCE U::R^2/3 OHS - 6

7 ILLUSTRATION OF STAGE- AREA/STAGE-VELOCITY METHOD OHS - 7

8 MANNING’S EQUATION METHOD METHOD –K* = f(h) PLOTTED FROM DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS –K* BECOMES APPROX. CONSTANT FOR h>> –K* WITH A r AND R r FROM MEASUREMENTS EXTRAPOLATED –FLOOD PLAIN TREATED BY MANNING EQUATION –S CAN BE ESTIMATED FROM TOPOSHEETS OHS - 8

9 MANNING’S EQUATION METHOD OHS - 9

10 OHS - 10

11 OHS - 11

12 OHS - 12

13 CONVEYANCE-SLOPE METHOD METHOD: –CONVEYANCE AND ENERGY SLOPE ARE EXTRAPOLATED SEPARATELY –A AND R FROM FIELD SURVEY –Km ESTIMATED IN FIELD –K EXTRAPOLATED –S FOLLOWS FROM (Q/K) 2 VERSUS h –EXISTING S-TENDENCY EXTRAPOLATED OHS - 13

14 OHS - 14

15 OHS - 15

16 INTERPRETATION OF WETTED PERIMETER FLOOD PLAIN RIVER OHS - 16

17 EXTRAPOLATION WITH HYMOS FIRST: –COMPUATATION OF GEOMETRIC AND HYDRAULIC QUANTITIES IN MEASRED RANGE NEXT: –PLOT OF FOLLOWING PARAMETERS AS f(h) *SURFACE WIDTH *WETTED PERIMETER *X-SECTIONAL AREA * HYDRAULIC RADIUS *AR 2/3, Q, u, conveyance K, AND S FINALLY: –K EXTRAPOLATED AND S ASYMPTOTICALLY EQUAL TO BEDSLOPE: Q = KS 1/2 OHS - 17

18 OHS - 18

19 OHS - 19

20 OHS - 20

21 OHS - 21

22 OHS - 22

23 OHS - 23

24 OHS - 24

25 OHS - 25

26 OHS - 26

27 OHS - 27

28 OHS - 28

29 OHS - 29

30 OHS - 30


Download ppt "EXTRAPOLATION OF RATING CURVE WHY: –GAUGING DOES NOT COVER FULL RANGE OF FLOW –CALIBRATION AT HIGH FLOW IS DIFFICULT: *OCCURS INFREQUENTLY *SHORT DURATION."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google