Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

January 14, 2015 Industry Briefing Construction Manager General Contractor CM/GC.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "January 14, 2015 Industry Briefing Construction Manager General Contractor CM/GC."— Presentation transcript:

1 January 14, 2015 Industry Briefing Construction Manager General Contractor CM/GC

2 Introductions New Delivery Method Benefits and Goals Important Roles Walk Bridge Selection Process Overview CTDOT Current Status & Next Steps

3 I.Important note – nothing presented or discussed here today is official. Refer to the RFQ, RFP, official questions and answers, and Contract II.Presenters a.James Fallon, P.E. – Manager of Facilities & Transit b.Mark Rolfe, P.E. – District Construction Engineer c.Christian Brown, P.E. – HNTB Project Manager III.Other Support – Larry Russ, Greg Dorosh, Domenic LaRosa, John Hanifin, Matt Poirier (Keville) Joe Allegro (ACS)

4 The CTDOT Committee has done extensive research I.NCHRP II.FHWA III.Utah & Colorado IV.Massachusetts Department of Transportation V.Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (GLX) VI.Others – Keville Enterprises & ACS FHWA

5 Projects that require early contractor involvement to optimize cost, schedule and quality When the owners wants some control of the scope and design during the project development process When the owner wants to use constructability, pricing and scheduling to finalize the scope Tight budget & schedule and requirements FHWA

6

7 Inherent project risk Opportunities for innovation Need for specialized qualifications Benefits from early procurement Limited or fixed budget FHWA

8 Opportunities for innovation Risk reduction & allocation Improved cost control Improved design quality Schedule optimization Collaboration FHWA

9 PROJECT TRAITSD-B-BCM/GCD-B RISK MANAGEMENT Very limitedVery effectiveBest for low risk shifting COLLABORATION Very limitedVery collaborativeModerate collaboration contractual limitations PRICE CERTAINTY None, subject to over- runs and change order Very effective, early price certainty during project development SCHEDULE ACCELERATION COMPLETION No ability to overlap design & construction. Can accelerate construction with A+B Ability to overlap design & construction, ability to optimize schedule not just acceleration Ability to overlap design & construction, very effective for accelerating project delivery CONSTRUCTION QUALITY Low bid can compromise quality Very beneficial to building a quality project GENERAL SUITABILITY OF DELIVERY MODEL

10 FHWA GENERAL SUITABILITY OF DELIVERY MODEL PROJECT TRAITS D-B-BCM/GCD-B INNOVATION Design innovation only, very limited opportunities for contractor innovation Very effective for capturing design and construction innovation CONSTRUCTABI LITY Very difficult to obtain construction input during design Optimal delivery method for obtaining construction input before design is complete Effective delivery method for obtaining construction input before design is complete OWNER CONTROL High level controlOptimal level of owner control Somewhat limited owner control, more performance based outcome COMPETITIVE PRICING High levelSomewhat limited, competitive markup not final project cost Good competition, but usually limited to short- listed teams

11 DESIGNER OF RECORD DB ENTITY TRADE / SUBS ConnDOT TRADE / SUBS DESIGN SUBS Design-BuildCM/GC ConnDOT DESIGNER OF RECORD CM/GC

12 Identify and manage risks, early in the process, and into the construction phase Optimize design and construction schedules/budgets Improve project quality Get it done properly and quickly Integrated team approach to:

13 Minimize construction changes Early Contactor advice and innovation Manage complex railroad requirements and limited access Minimize disruption to bridge users

14

15 Public Owner o Project Management Team o Discipline Leads PM Consultant Designer Independent Cost Estimator (ICE) DESIGNER CM/GC PM Consultant Independent Cost Estimator ConnDOT ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

16 Design Consultant (Engineer) remains the ‘Engineer of Record’ CM/GC is to identify innovative construction solutions CM/GC to provide advice to designer during final design The CMGC Delivery model promotes cooperation, collaboration, and efficiency Co-location

17 Maintains flexibility to determine what elements of the work to self-perform to meet the 50% requirement Emphasis is on contractor experience(s) as part of selection Is expected to generate innovative construction ideas prior to pricing Increased quality of final design plans Maximizes the opportunity to add value to project

18 Coordinated planning & construction operations Constructability reviews Early risk identification, mitigation and sharing program Options analysis (cost, schedule, efficiency, quality) Detailed cost estimates and knowledge of marketplace conditions Overall project price certainty (GMP) Advise ConnDOT on ways to gain efficiencies Mitigate construction impact on bridge/rail users PRECONSTRUCTION

19 Defined Comprised of all construction work – including Subcontractor, Project Overheads, and the Construction Multiplier (Home Office Overhead and Profit) Finalized when the design reaches 100% Contingency will be Owner Controlled Contract Packaging TBD (GMP)

20 The CM/GC team may be comprised of multiple prime contractors and named key sub-contractors CM/GC provides a Sub-Contractor plan as part of the RFP CM/GC must self-perform no less than 50% of the work CM/GC must prepare sub-contractor bid packages and facilitate a transparent sub- contractor selection Note: Unsuccessful GMP = will be re-bid by other methods and the CM/GC will be precluded from bidding the re- packaged work

21 The price of ‘Pre-Con’ staffing will not be factored as part of the selection » After selection negotiations of preconstruction phase services will proceed based on ‘hours’ to meet combined goals » ConnDOT may establish a Max/Not to Exceed for Pre-Con phase CM/GC bidders are to propose all key staff members as part of the ‘Experience section’ of the RFQ ‘Approach section’ - all CM/GC bidders are to furnish resumes and rates of all staff that are proposed to be a part of the Pre-Con The CM/GC Entity will submit actual expenses – certifying paid staff at rates provided - with Preconstruction Services Multiplier applied PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES ANTICIPATED TO BE 18 TO 24 MONTHS

22 DESIGN SUBS CTDOT DESIGNER OF RECORD CM/GC (named subs) CM/GC (named subs) Negotiate (Interim) GMP Bid competitively TRADE / SUBS RELATIONSHIP AND PRICING

23 DESIGN SUBS DESIGNER OF RECORD CM/GC (named subs) CM/GC (named subs) TRADE / SUBS PM Consultant Independent Cost Estimator Other Owner Support Peer Review CTDOT OTHER KEY TEAM SUPPORT

24 24 PM Consultant Independent Cost Estimator CTDOT CM/GC All: Discuss and Plan – Work Breakdown & Estimate Organization Cost estimate narrative Limitations of operations & Schedule Requirements Quantities Method of measurement Basis of payment Means & Methods Equipment Crews Risk Items Sub-Contracting Packaging Estimate ESTIMATE CALIBRATION MEETINGS

25

26

27  The Contractor will be selected using a “best value” Quality Based Selection process  ConnDOT Selection Committee will evaluate the Proposer’s:  qualifications  technical proposal  interview  and price proposal

28 In accordance with the ConnDOT Bid and Award Manual  GROUP NO. 10 MAJOR BRIDGES – the prime Contractor must meet this prequalification requirement. Seeking specific experience in the construction of movable bridges.  GROUP NO. 21 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION and GROUP NO. 22 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICAL – The Proposer shall meet these two requirements (Group 21 and 22) either as the prime bidder or by use of a Key Subcontractor.  Pre-Qualification application must be on file prior to the submission of the Statement of Qualifications

29 Team Experience Construction Experience Construction Administration Skills Construction Oversight Corporate AA/EEO Plan RFQ Criteria

30 General Management Subcontracting Plan Preconstruction Phase Construction Phase Interview Price Component

31 1st 2n d 3r d Price Score EXAMPLE – Similar to the MBTA GLX Project (40 Points for Price and 60 Points for Tech Score) PRICING COMPONENT & TECH SCORE

32

33 33  Industry Briefing1/14/15 (TODAY)  Issue RFQWeek 1/19/15  Proposers Submit SOQWeek of 2/09/15  Issue RFPWeek of 3/9/15  Proposers Submit Proposal Week of 4/6/15  Select CM/GCWeek of 5/11/15 ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE:

34 34 DOTWalkBridge@CT.gov


Download ppt "January 14, 2015 Industry Briefing Construction Manager General Contractor CM/GC."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google