1. Chapter 9 Uniprocessor Scheduling Operating Systems: Internals and Design Principles, 6/E William Stallings Dave Bremer Otago Polytechnic, N.Z. ©2008, Prentice Hall

2. Roadmap Types of Processor Scheduling Scheduling Algorithms Traditional UNIX Scheduling

3. Scheduling An OS must allocate resources amongst competing processes. The resource provided by a processor is execution time –The resource is allocated by means of a schedule

4. Overall Aim of Scheduling The aim of processor scheduling is to assign processes to be executed by the processor over time, –in a way that meets system objectives, such as response time, throughput, and processor efficiency.

5. Scheduling Objectives The scheduling function should –Share time fairly among processes –Prevent starvation of a process –Use the processor efficiently –Have low overhead –Prioritise processes when necessary (e.g. real time deadlines)

6. Types of Scheduling

7. Two Suspend States Remember this diagram from Chapter 3

8. Scheduling and Process State Transitions

9. Nesting of Scheduling Functions

10. Queuing Diagram

11. Long-Term Scheduling Determines which programs are admitted to the system for processing –May be first-come-first-served –Or according to criteria such as priority, I/O requirements or expected execution time Controls the degree of multiprogramming More processes, smaller percentage of time each process is executed

12. Medium-Term Scheduling Part of the swapping function Swapping-in decisions are based on the need to manage the degree of multiprogramming

13. Short-Term Scheduling Known as the dispatcher Executes most frequently Invoked when an event occurs –Clock interrupts –I/O interrupts –Operating system calls –Signals

14. Roadmap Types of Processor Scheduling Scheduling Algorithms Traditional UNIX Scheduling

15. Aim of Short Term Scheduling Main objective is to allocate processor time to optimize certain aspects of system behaviour. A set of criteria is needed to evaluate the scheduling policy.

16. Short-Term Scheduling Criteria: User vs System We can differentiate between user and system criteria User-oriented –Response Time Elapsed time between the submission of a request until there is output. System-oriented –Effective and efficient utilization of the processor

17. Short-Term Scheduling Criteria: Performance We could differentiate between performance related criteria, and those unrelated to performance Performance-related –Quantitative, easily measured –E.g. response time and throughput Non-performance related –Qualitative –Hard to measure

18. Interdependent Scheduling Criteria

19. Interdependent Scheduling Criteria cont.

20. Priorities Scheduler will always choose a process of higher priority over one of lower priority Have multiple ready queues to represent each level of priority

21. Priority Queuing

22. Starvation Problem: –Lower-priority may suffer starvation if there is a steady supply of high priority processes. Solution –Allow a process to change its priority based on its age or execution history

23. Alternative Scheduling Policies

24. Selection Function Determines which process is selected for execution If based on execution characteristics then important quantities are: w = time spent in system so far, waiting e = time spent in execution so far s = total service time required by the process, including e;

25. Decision Mode Specifies the instants in time at which the selection function is exercised. Two categories: –Nonpreemptive –Preemptive

26. Nonpreemptive vs Premeptive Non-preemptive –Once a process is in the running state, it will continue until it terminates or blocks itself for I/O Preemptive –Currently running process may be interrupted and moved to ready state by the OS –Preemption may occur when new process arrives, on an interrupt, or periodically.

27. Process Scheduling Example Example set of processes, consider each a batch job –Service time represents total execution time

28. First-Come- First-Served Each process joins the Ready queue When the current process ceases to execute, the longest process in the Ready queue is selected

29. First-Come- First-Served A short process may have to wait a very long time before it can execute Favors CPU-bound processes –I/O processes have to wait until CPU-bound process completes

30. Round Robin Uses preemption based on a clock –also known as time slicing, because each process is given a slice of time before being preempted.

31. Round Robin Clock interrupt is generated at periodic intervals When an interrupt occurs, the currently running process is placed in the ready queue –Next ready job is selected

32. Effect of Size of Preemption Time Quantum

34. ‘Virtual Round Robin’

35. Shortest Process Next Nonpreemptive policy Process with shortest expected processing time is selected next Short process jumps ahead of longer processes

36. Shortest Process Next Predictability of longer processes is reduced If estimated time for process not correct, the operating system may abort it Possibility of starvation for longer processes

37. Calculating Program ‘Burst’ Where: –T i = processor execution time for the ith instance of this process –S i = predicted value for the ith instance –S 1 = predicted value for first instance; not calculated

38. Exponential Averaging A common technique for predicting a future value on the basis of a time series of past values is exponential averaging

39. Exponential Smoothing Coefficients

40. Use Of Exponential Averaging

42. Shortest Remaining Time Preemptive version of shortest process next policy Must estimate processing time and choose the shortest

43. Highest Response Ratio Next Choose next process with the greatest ratio

44. Feedback Scheduling Penalize jobs that have been running longer Don’t know remaining time process needs to execute

45. Feedback Performance Variations exist, simple version pre-empts periodically, similar to round robin –But can lead to starvation

46. Performance Comparison Any scheduling discipline that chooses the next item to be served independent of service time obeys the relationship:

47. Formulas

48. Overall Normalized Response Time

49. Normalized Response Time for Shorter Process

50. Normalized Response Time for Longer Processes

51. Normalized Turnaround Time

52. Fair-Share Scheduling User’s application runs as a collection of processes (threads) User is concerned about the performance of the application Need to make scheduling decisions based on process sets

53. Fair-Share Scheduler

54. Roadmap Types of Processor Scheduling Scheduling Algorithms Traditional UNIX Scheduling

55. Multilevel feedback using round robin within each of the priority queues If a running process does not block or complete within 1 second, it is preempted Priority is based on process type and execution history.

56. Scheduling Formula

57. Bands Priorities are recomputed once per second Base priority divides all processes into fixed bands of priority levels –Swapper (highest) –Block I/O device control –File manipulation –Character I/O device control –User processes (lowest)

58. Example of Traditional UNIX Process Scheduling