1. Contexts in transformation and processes of urban participation Fortuna Procentese University of Naples “Federico II”, Department of Relational Science “G. Iacono”. forprocentese@libero.it

2. AIMS Evaluation of participation in urban places to point out and to think over the interventions in the contexts in transformation and to promote processes of urban participation Dialogue and Sharing between all stakeholders and citizen in planning context To give back Knowledge and local skills To promote actions and citizen’s participation

3. Evaluation of research tools for the study of social transformation and following actions  Analysis of the community ( Francescato’s Community Profiles; Arcidiacono, 1999; Arcidiacono, Sommantico, Procentese, 2002) in order to achieve a careful and accurate knowledge of the situation of the territorial context by studying the socio-environmental, demographic, anthropological (Signorelli, 1996) and psychological variables of the city.  Key people and stakeholders interviews.  Questionnaires and specific scale (environment, neighbourhood, etc.)  Photo-dialogue (Legewie 2000, 2003; Arcidiacono,2004; Procentese, 2004).  Public Exhibition is the catalyst for the new tools combination. The results get presented in text and picture.  The exhibition creates a space for a dialogue among people of the community: the interviewees and interviewer meet, the general public gets invited, representatives of all stakeholder-groups get in touch and discuss the results.

4. Study of research project “Urban Catalysts– Strategies for Temporary Uses. Potential for Development of Urban Residual Areas in European Metropolises”, (Procentese 2002 ) PHASE I Objectives: this qualitative study, realised in five Europeans city, has examined the reason of the presence and characteristics of the residual areas to understand the quality and development of the temporary use and to develop tools and methodology to empowerment citizen management.The attention is focalised on the urban aspects and public politicies for the territorial spaces. In Campania, Phlegrean region has been considered, and in particular the area extending from Capo Miseno to Monte di Procida, and along the coast between Bacoli and Fusaro. Methodology: a) 15 semi-structured interviews carried out in September 2001. b)Exhibition. C)Public debate with the participant of local politicians and association. PHASE II: FOLLOW UP INTERVIEWS 5 MONTHS AFTER In this phase we identified the salient points expressed by the participants in relation to the changes and dialogue developed among the various groups present on the territory Methodology: 9 Interviews The interviewed people were chosen according to the indications and criteria laid down by the team of professionals involved in the Urban Catalyst project; they include representatives of institutions, trades people and local residents (local administrators, restaurant owners, managers of bathing establishments, carpark attendants and boat minders) and individuals (visitors, day trippers, people practising sports) who make temporary use of the territory. the interviewed person have been individuated among the participants to the exhibition: 6 given contribution to the realizations of events while 3 have visited the exhibition. DATA ANALISYS the interviews have been analysed for thematic areas in order to aim exploration effects of the utilised methodology Historical centre of Naples Arcidiacono, 2002, 2003, 2004; Arcidiacono Procentese, in press. PHASE I the research explored the relation between inhabitants and tourists in the historical centre of Naples, rich in history and traditions. the aim has been to investigate the psychological sense of community in a very distinctiveness context following a participatory action research methodology and using a qualitative approach to the analysis of the collected data. The chosen methodology allows us to discover the social representation of the area and to create a specifically hierarchy related to the investigated context. The action-research, carried out in collaboration with the Municipality of Naples, the Tourist Office and associations of the quarter. The scope is to explore the community identity and its representation among the inhabitants with regard to their belonging to the historical Centre, as well as their representation of the resources, limits and potentialities of the area, also considering the social and cultural impact of tourism. 1 YEAR AFTER PHASE II To examine the effects, the processes, challenges and problem associated with the conduct participatory methodology after public exhibition 2 Discussion group with 10 participants to the exhibition (stakeholders, referents associations; citizen) – 5 Interviews to Key people and citizen DATA ANALISYS the interviews have been analysed for thematic areas in order to aims exploration effects of the utilised methodology Results? Effectiveness?

5. People evaluation of factors facilitating and not the realisation of individual and collective actions Visibility: presentation of the participants’ idea and resources in a public context reciprocal listening: “ people are talking and communication each other ” researchers are in the community life spaces life places are seen “with peoples’ eyes” Sharing: institutional referents, familiars and friends share commune views improving individual and social empowerment Restitution to the local referents of citizen and stakeholders perception of their activity for local context Acquisition of legislation and general information to access to the resources existents Lack of: future actions of groups that have contratuality with local administration projectual phase: the consequences is distrust

6. What’s happening on the stocks  revalorization of citizens potentiality and competences: e.g Inscription to school; improve their economical activities and services;  dialogue with administration. Citizen thinks it’s more available to be listen and considered;  social engagement has individual and collective benefices because citizen have perception of individual and community empowerment:e.g Association for elderly, category committee as tools to have more contractual strength.  Events : meeting among stakeholders groups in public contexts

7.  Longer Exposition, in a more visible and significant place, where citizens and visitors can meet to propose future actions  To have political representing more involved  To do other exhibition to compare with the present one and to verify really changes and continuity in a long time  Realisation of other workshops.  To improve knowledge about : legislation tools, administrations working -rules  Communication tools Some Proposals of our Inhabitants

8. Process Indicators Television Programs Press and Media Contribute Politics Intervention Local Information and Narrative Video Creation New association Existent dialogue (meetings,..) Development of school projects promoting local participation Outcome Indicators At the collective level. Organisations of activity group following the thematic exhibition and project communications Associations Constitution (i.e Cento per il Centro) Intervention Request in other quarters Active participation in communal assemble getting intervention for the local security and for the places care Further aggregation of existent associations i.e in the old centre of Naples as expression of group empowerment At individual level Poetry and texts creation Increase in school attendance Further Photographic exhibition Effectiveness

9. Evaluations:limits and suggestions Lack of meeting opportunity in the territorial context; Lack of available communication channels and referents; Poor or inadequate information. Discontinue and long lasting research process. Poor legislative tools and financial resource Consequences: distrust, disinterest in a commune projectuality Implementation of network between associations and new territorial focal points. Initiatives to promote dialogue in the community. Building permanent meeting places for the local development. To be able to consider: if the initiative starts from above or below; the structure and channels of participation; furthermore it’s necessary to consider the local last of participation and motivations Meeting with associations’ referents to discuss peculiar thematic, to understand the disposability to create group, to promote initiatives and proposes in the local context Researcher (with function of catalyst and facilitator);

10. SHARED DIALOGUE among INSTITUTION, STAKHOLDERS AND CITIZEN for a commune project NEGOTIATIONS SKILLS FOR PRACTICAL ACTIONS INDIVIDUAL ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL CONTEXT “ WHERE THERE IS A WILL, THERE IS A WAY” FACTORS PROMOTING PARTICIPATION PROCESSES VALORIZATION of PERSONAL RESOUCES USE OF MEETING SPACES MOTIVATION REAL ACTIONS Improving of COMUNICATION SOCIAL POWER