1. WHO, WHAT, HOW, WHY, WHEN and WHERE
BOND CONDITIONS
WHO, WHAT, HOW, WHY, WHEN and WHERE
HON. MARC H. NEWMAN
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE
WICHITA COUNTY
(940)

2. OBJECTIVES
TO REVIEW WITH MAGISTRATES THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS OF CCP CHAPTER 17 CONCERNING BOND CONDITIONS
TO DISCUSS EXISTING CASE PRECIDENT
TO FAMILIARIZE MAGISTRATES WITH THE USES AND BENEFITS OF BOND CONDITIONS
TO EXPLORE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CREATIVE CONDITIONS AND ABUSE OF DISCRETION
TO ASSIST MAGISTRATES IN ESTABLISHING WORKABLE SYSTEMS OF ISSUANCE AND MANAGEMENT

3. WHO HAS AUTHORITY TO ISSUE
A MAGISTRATE OR THE MAGISTRATE
Art CONDITIONS RELATED TO VICTIM OR COMMUNITY SAFETY. (a) To secure a defendant's attendance at trial, a magistrate may impose any reasonable condition of bond related to the safety of a victim of the alleged offense or to the safety of the community.

4. DOES THIS GIVE TRIAL COURTS, JUDGES, OR OTHER OFFICERS THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE OR MODIFY BOND CONDITIONS?
THIS IS NOT WELL SETTLED. THE STATUTES REFER TO MAGISTRATES BUT CASE LAW FREQUENTLY SUBSTITUTES “TRIAL COURT JUDGE”. WE SHOULD NOT BE OVERLY CONCERNED SO LONG AS THE MATTER IS PROPERLY BEFORE THE JUDGE SEEKING TO MODIFY.

5. Art. 17.38. RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL CASES OF BAIL.
The rules in this Chapter respecting bail are applicable to all such undertakings when entered into in the course of a criminal action, whether before or after an indictment, in every case where authority is given to any court, judge, magistrate, or other officer, to require bail of a person accused of an offense, or of a witness in a criminal action.

6. Art. 17.09. DURATION; ORIGINAL AND SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS; NEW BAIL
Sec. 3. Provided that whenever, during the course of the action, the judge or magistrate in whose court such action is pending finds that the bond is defective, excessive or insufficient in amount, or that the sureties, if any, are not acceptable, or for any other good and sufficient cause, such judge or magistrate may, either in term-time or in vacation, order the accused to be rearrested, and require the accused to give another bond in such amount as the judge or magistrate may deem proper. When such bond is so given and approved, the defendant shall be released from custody.

7. EX PARTE David Clear No. 59288 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 573 S.W.2d 224 November 1, 1978
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Relator filed an application for writ of habeas corpus and alleged that a judge of a Harris County District Court (Texas), illegally assumed jurisdiction as a magistrate of a felony complaint filed against him and unlawfully raised his bond.
IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, MAY TERM, A.D "I, George L. Walker, Judge of the 185th District Court of Harris County, Texas, hereby assume jurisdiction of the above-numbered and styled pre-assigned felony complaint case and hereby direct the District Clerk to issue appropriate process for the confinement of the defendant on the bond revocation ordered by this Court on this date.
OUTCOME: Writ of habeas corpus was issued and the district court's order was vacated. The district court judge exceeded his jurisdiction when he presided as magistrate over the complaint issued against relator in the justice court and when he increased relator's bail.

8. WHO – MAY MODIFY?
THE JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE OF THE COURT WHERE THE CASE IS FILED/PENDING.
THE JUDGE OF A COURT WITH TRIAL JURISDICTION, BUT ONLY AFTER THE CASE IS PROPERLY BEFORE THAT COURT (BY INFORMATION OR INDICTMENT); OR,
THE JUDGE OF A COURT WITH TRIAL JURISDICTION IF THE CASE IS BROUGHT BY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

9. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
PRETRIAL HABEAS CORPUS IS CLASSED AS AN “EXTRORDINARY” REMEDY, AND THE MATTERS THAT MAY BE ADDRESSED ARE NARROW.
GENERALLY THE ISSUES ARE LIMITED TO SHOWING THAT SOME CIRCUMSTANCE BARS THE STATE FROM PROSECUTING, OR
THAT THE DEFENDANT IS BEING EXCESSIVELY OR IMPROPERLY/ILLEGALLY RESTRAINED.
THIS CAN INCLUDE CONDITIONS OF BOND.
A DEFENDANT OUT ON BOND IS STILL CONSIDERED “RESTRAINED”

10. WRIT (CON’T)
A defendant’s appeal is restricted to situations where the trial court held a hearing on the merits and denied relief.
No appeal can be taken from the trial court’s refusal to issue a writ or grant a hearing.
If the writ is issued, the accused is no longer being held under the original bond, but under the jurisdiction of the issuing court.
At the conclusion of a hearing on the writ, the issuing court must either discharge, commit or admit the defendant to bond. We assume that conditions may be attached to the bond.

11. WHO – MONITORS AND ENFORCES COMPLIANCE?
THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE OF THE COURT IN WHICH THE CRIMINAL ACTION IS PENDING OR THE CLERKS OF THAT COURT.
AN APPROPRIATE AGENCY DESIGNATED BY THE ISSUING MAGISTRATE. A COST MAY BE ASSESSED.
THE MONITOR MAY RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT, JAIL STAFF, TESTING LABS, RELATIVES, STATE OR DEFENSE ATTORNEYS OR ANY OTHER RELIABLE SOURCE.

12. WHAT – CONDITIONS ARE STATUTORILY MANDATED?
ART – FAMILY VIOLENCE INVOLVING AGGRAVATED ASSAULT OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY
ART – CHILD VICTIM U/14
PC CH. 21 (SEXUAL OFFENSES)
PC CH 22 (ASSAULT)
PC CH (PROHIBITED SEXUAL CONDUCT)
PC CH (SEXUAL PERFORMANCE)
ART – IGNITION INTERLOCK
SECOND OFFENSE DWI, DWI W/CHILD, FWI, BWI
(NOTE – THE STATUTE SAYS “CHARGED WITH A SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE”. IT DOES NOT SAY THE DEFENDANT NEEDED TO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF THE FIRST CHARGED OFFENSE)
INTOXICATION ASSAULT OR INTOXICATION MANSLAUGHTER

13. ART 17.47 (b) – DNA SAMPLE REQUIRED FOR RELEASE
GOV’T CODE (a)(2) ARRESTED FOR A FELONY DESCRIBED BY SUBDIVISION (1) AFTER HAVING BEEN PREVIOUSLY CONVICTED OF OR PLACED ON DEFERRED ADJUDICATION FOR AN OFFENSE DESCRIBED BY SUBDIVISION (1) OR AN OFFENSE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 30.02(C)(2), PENAL CODE (BURGLARY OF A HABITATION); OR (3) CONVICTED UNDER SECTION OR (PUBLIC LEWDNESS OR INDECENT EXPOSURE)
SUBDIVISION (1) OFFENSES :
20.04(a)(4) (AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING WITH INTENT TO CAUSE BODILY INJURY OR VIOLATE OR ABUSE SEXUALLY).
21.11 (INDECENCY WITH CHILD).
(SEXUAL ASSAULT).
(AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT).
25.02 (PROHIBITED SEXUAL CONDUCT OR 'INCEST').
30.02(d) (BURGLARY OF A HABITATION COMMITTING OR WITH INTENT TO COMMIT A NON-THEFT FELONY).
43.05 (COMPELLING PROSTITUTION).
43.25 (SEXUAL PERFORMANCE BY CHILD).
43.26 (POSSESSION OR PROMOTION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY)

14. WHAT – CONDITIONS ARE PERMISSIVE
Ex parte Robert D. TUCKER, Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. June 25, 1998, No.  CR.
CASE FILED AS A PRETRIAL WRIT APPEAL IN CCA
BASED ON A CONTENTION THAT TRIAL COURT HAD NO JURISDICTION TO ORDER A BOND CONDITION NOT EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE.
APPEALS COURT RULED IN FAVOR OF TUCKER.
LEGISLATURE SUBSEQUENTLY CHANGED CCP FROM MAY TO SHALL
WE MUST ALWAYS REMEMBER THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “MAY” AND “SHALL”

15. THE PERMISSIVE STATUTES
CCP CONDITIONS REQUIRING AIDS and HIV INSTRUCTION
CCP CONDITIONS FOR A DEFENDANT CHARGED WITH STALKING
CCP MAGISTRATE’S ORDER FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION (when issuing a permissive order)
CCP 17.47(a) CONDITIONS REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF SPECIMEN (also includes a permissive provision)

16. PERMISSIVE STATUTES, CONTINUED
CCP CONDITIONS FOR DEFENDANT CHARGED WITH OFFENSE INVOLVING FAMILY VIOLENCE.
ADDS GPS AS A PERMITTED CONDITION
CCP HOME CURFEW AND ELECTRONIC MONITORING AS CONDITION
“MAY” REQUIRE AS A CONDITION OF RELEASE ON PR BOND
CCP HOME CONFINEMENT, ELECTRONIC MONITORING, AND DRUG TESTING AS CONDITION
“MAY” REQUIRE AS A CONDITION OF RELEASE ON BOND
BOTH AND USE “AND” BETWEEN CURFEW OR CONFINEMENT AND ELECTRONIC MONITORING.

17. PERMISSIVE STATUTES, CONTINUED
THE SOLUTION MAY BE IN THE COMPARATIVE LANGUAGE(S)
Art CONDITIONS RELATED TO VICTIM OR COMMUNITY SAFETY. (a) To secure a defendant's attendance at trial, a magistrate may impose any reasonable condition of bond related to the safety of a victim of the alleged offense or to the safety of the community.
Art HOME CURFEW AND ELECTRONIC MONITORING AS CONDITION. (a) A magistrate may require as a condition of release on personal bond that the defendant submit to home curfew and electronic monitoring…….
Art HOME CONFINEMENT, ELECTRONIC MONITORING, AND DRUG TESTING AS CONDITION. (a) A magistrate may require as a condition of release on bond that the defendant submit to:

18. PERMISSIVE STATUTES, CONTINUED
CCP DEALS WITH CONDITION(S) OF BOND
CCP AND DEAL WITH CONDITIONS OF RELEASE.
THE LANGUAGE SUGGESTS THAT EITHER THE PR BOND (17.43) OR THE RELEASE ITSELF (17.44) WERE NOT FOREGONE CONCLUSIONS:
CCP COULD APPLY TO CCP Art RELEASE ON BOND OF CERTAIN PERSONS ARRESTED WITHOUT A WARRANT., BUT ONLY IF THE ACCUSED CAN AFFORD A SURETY BOND
EITHER STATUTE COULD APPLY TO A DENIAL OF BAIL CASE
AS WITH Art , Art COULD APPLY TO AN Art RELEASE, BUT ONLY IF THE ACCUSED CAN AFFORD A SURETY. Art CAN NEVER APPLY.

19. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF BOND - FEDERAL
18 U.S. Code § Release or detention of a defendant pending trial
(a) In General.— Upon the appearance before a judicial officer of a person charged with an offense, the judicial officer shall issue an order that, pending trial, the person be— (1) released on personal recognizance or upon execution of an unsecured appearance bond, under subsection (b) of this section;
(2) released on a condition or combination of conditions under subsection (c) of this section;
(3) temporarily detained to permit revocation of conditional release, deportation, or exclusion under subsection (d) of this section; or
(4) detained under subsection (e) of this section.
(b) Release on Personal Recognizance or Unsecured Appearance Bond.— The judicial officer shall order the pretrial release of the person on personal recognizance, or upon execution of an unsecured appearance bond in an amount specified by the court, subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release and subject to the condition that the person cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the person if the collection of such a sample is authorized pursuant to section 3 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C a), unless the judicial officer determines that such release will not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required or will endanger the safety of any other person or the community.
(c) Release on Conditions.— (1) If the judicial officer determines that the release described in subsection (b) of this section will not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required or will endanger the safety of any other person or the community, such judicial officer shall order the pretrial release of the person— (A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release and subject to the condition that the person cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the person if the collection of such a sample is authorized pursuant to section 3 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C a); and
(B) subject to the least restrictive further condition, or combination of conditions, that such judicial officer determines will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community, which may include the condition that the person— (i) remain in the custody of a designated person, who agrees to assume supervision and to report any violation of a release condition to the court, if the designated person is able reasonably to assure the judicial officer that the person will appear as required and will not pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community;
(ii) maintain employment, or, if unemployed, actively seek employment;

20. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF BOND – FEDERAL, CONTINUED
(iii) maintain or commence an educational program;
(iv) abide by specified restrictions on personal associations, place of abode, or travel;
(v) avoid all contact with an alleged victim of the crime and with a potential witness who may testify concerning the offense;
(vi) report on a regular basis to a designated law enforcement agency, pretrial services agency, or other agency;
(vii) comply with a specified curfew;
(viii) refrain from possessing a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon;
(ix) refrain from excessive use of alcohol, or any use of a narcotic drug or other controlled substance, as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802), without a prescription by a licensed medical practitioner;
(x) undergo available medical, psychological, or psychiatric treatment, including treatment for drug or alcohol dependency, and remain in a specified institution if required for that purpose;
(xi) execute an agreement to forfeit upon failing to appear as required, property of a sufficient unencumbered value, including money, as is reasonably necessary to assure the appearance of the person as required, and shall provide the court with proof of ownership and the value of the property along with information regarding existing encumbrances as the judicial office may require;
(xii) execute a bail bond with solvent sureties; who will execute an agreement to forfeit in such amount as is reasonably necessary to assure appearance of the person as required and shall provide the court with information regarding the value of the assets and liabilities of the surety if other than an approved surety and the nature and extent of encumbrances against the surety’s property; such surety shall have a net worth which shall have sufficient unencumbered value to pay the amount of the bail bond;
(xiii) return to custody for specified hours following release for employment, schooling, or other limited purposes; and
(xiv) satisfy any other condition that is reasonably necessary to assure the appearance of the person as required and to assure the safety of any other person and the community. In any case that involves a minor victim under section 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244 (a)(1), 2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252 (a)(1), 2252 (a)(2), 2252 (a)(3), 2252A (a)(1), 2252A (a)(2), 2252A (a)(3), 2252A (a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425 of this title, or a failure to register offense under section 2250 of this title, any release order shall contain, at a minimum, a condition of electronic monitoring and each of the conditions specified at subparagraphs (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), and (viii).
(2) The judicial officer may not impose a financial condition that results in the pretrial detention of the person.
(3) The judicial officer may at any time amend the order to impose additional or different conditions of release.

21. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF BOND - TEXAS
Ex Parte Leverett, No CR, 2006 WL (Tex.App.—Dallas 2006) (not designated for publication).
The following conditions imposed on appeal bond after misdemeanor DWI conviction were held to be proper:
1) Commit no offense against the laws of Texas or any other state or the United States;
2) Consume no alcoholic beverages;
3) Report in person to the pretrial release supervising officer (hereinafter “supervising officer”) of the Grayson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department, beginning on the date of this order, and one time per month thereafter;
4) Pay a monthly supervisory fee in the amount of $20.00 to the Grayson County Community Supervision and Corrections Department;
5) Remain within Grayson County, Texas, unless express permission to leave said county is granted by the supervising officer or by the Court;
6) Submit a specimen of breath or blood as directed from time to time by the supervising officer for the detection of alcohol in the defendant’s body and pay any and all fees associated therewith;
7) Operate no motor vehicle with any detectable amount of alcohol in the defendant’s body;
8) Submit a specimen of breath or blood for analysis to determine the alcohol concentration in the defendant’s body upon the request of any peace officer as authorized by law;
9) Have installed on the motor vehicle owned by the defendant, or on the vehicle most regularly operated by the defendant, an ignition interlock device, approved by the Texas Department of Public Safety, that uses a deep lung breath analysis mechanism to make impractical the operation of a motor vehicle if ethyl alcohol is detected in the breath of the operator. Such device shall be installed on the appropriate vehicle, at the defendant’s expense, within 30 days from the date of this order;
10) Provide proof of installation of such ignition interlock device to the supervising officer on or before the 30th day after the date of this order; and
11) Operate no motor vehicle that is not equipped with an ignition interlock device.

22. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF BOND – TEXAS, CONTINUED
Grady v. State, 962 S.W.2d 128 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref’d).
Courts have no authority to put conditions on misdemeanor appeal bonds that are not provided for by statute.  In this case, the conditions that the defendant: 1) submit to random UA;  2) place interlock device on vehicle;  3)home confinement;  4) electronic monitoring were upheld.  Condition that he attend AA was held to be invalid.

23. THREE PRONG TEST
Art CONDITIONS RELATED TO VICTIM OR COMMUNITY SAFETY. (a) To secure a
(1) defendant's attendance at trial, a magistrate may impose any reasonable condition of bond related to the
(2) safety of a victim of the alleged offense or to the
(3) safety of the community.

24. REASONABLENESS IS THE KEY
DRUG TESTING
ALCOHOL MONITORING
STAY-AWAY ORDERS
PROHIBIT NEW OFFENSES
REQUIRE PERIODIC CHECK-IN
PERMITTING ACCUSED TO SEEK REHABILITATION IN LIEU OF INCARCERATION

25. CREATIVITY CAN BE YOUR DOWNFALL
NOT ENGAGE IN “INJURIOUS” PRACTICES
NOT ASSOCIATE WITH “DISREPUTABLE” PERSONS
NOT DRINK ALCOHOL “TO EXCESS”
MAINTAIN “SUITABLE” EMPLOYMENT
ORDERING ACCUSED TO ATTEND SELF/GROUP HELP OR REHABILITATION.

26. WHY USE BOND CONDITIONS?
TO SECURE THE ACCUSED’S ATTENDANCE AT TRIAL
IN THE INTEREST OF VICTIM SAFETY
IN THE INTEREST OF COMMUNITY SAFETY
WELCOME (BUT UNINTENDED) BENEFITS
AIDS IN THE REDUCTION OF REPEAT OFFENSES AND ASSOCIATED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
ASSISTS IN KEEPING CONTACT ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THE COURTS AND THE DEFENDANT
RECORD OF COMPLIANCE (OR LACK OF) ASSISTS TRIAL COURTS IN ASSESSING SUITABILITY FOR PROBATION, ETC.
SOME DEFENDANTS FIND THEY CAN ACTUALLY LIVE CLEAN AND SOBER

27. OK, SO WHAT DO YOU DO IF AN EPO WAS NEEDED, BUT NOT ISSUED?
WHEN AND WHERE
MAGISTRATE’S ORDERS FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION ARE, BY STATUTORY LANGUAGE, DONE AT ACCUSED’S FIRST APPEARANCE BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE AFTER ARREST.
OTHER CONDITIONS SHOULD BE DONE AT FIRST APPEARANCE, BUT MAY BE DONE LATER.
OK, SO WHAT DO YOU DO IF AN EPO WAS NEEDED, BUT NOT ISSUED?

28. WHEN AND WHERE, CONTINUED
THE SPECIFIC BOND CONDITIONS SHOULD BE EXPLAINED IN CLEAR LANGUAGE IN OPEN COURT.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBSERVE THOSE CONDITIONS SHOULD ALSO BE MADE VERY CLEAR.
ACCUSED SHALL BE PROVIDED A COPY OF THE ORDER IN PERSON OR ELECTRONICALLY. REMIND THE ACCUSED TO MAKE SURE HE HAS A COPY WHEN HE LEAVES CUSTODY AND TELL HIM WHO TO CONTACT TO GET A NEW COPY, IF NEEDED.
SEND A COPY OF THE BOND CONDITION ORDER TO THE BONDING COMPANY AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY.

29. HOW THIS IS THE PART THAT MAKES OR BREAKS YOUR BOND CONDITION PROGRAM
ACCURATE RECORDS AND DAILY MONITORING ARE THE KEYS.
FAILURE TO UNIFORMLY ENFORCE YOUR CONDITIONS CAN LEAD TO CLAIMS OF DISCRIMINATION OR ABUSE.
DEVELOP A GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR LABORATORIES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.
ESPECIALLY WITH LABS, A RELEASE MAY NEED TO BE SIGNED BY THE ACCUSED, AS REPORTS MUST BE SENT DIRECT FROM THE LAB.
BE PREPARED TO BE SOMEWHAT FLEXIBLE.
BE PREPARED TO DEFEND YOUR CONDITIONS AND ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM.

30. MEET WITH YOUR TRIAL COURT JUDGES AND EXPLAIN YOUR PROGRAM.
HOW, CONTINUED
MEET WITH YOUR CA/DA AND REVIEW YOUR PROGRAM. DO NOT BE SURPRISED IF THEY DECLINE TO APPEAR AT HEARINGS
MEET WITH YOUR TRIAL COURT JUDGES AND EXPLAIN YOUR PROGRAM.
MEET WITH YOUR FELLOW JP’S/MAGISTRATES TO SOLICIT THEIR CO-OPERATION AND PARTICIPATION.
DEVELOP LOCAL RULES FOR EXCHANGE OF BENCHES AS REQUIRED.
DO NOT LET YOUR COMPLIANCE DOCKET FALL BEHIND.

31. BOTH CONDITIONS CONTAIN “INITIAL CONTACT” PROVISIONS
HOW, CONTINUED
DRUG TESTING AND ALCOHOL PROHIBITION CASES WILL REPRESENT THE MAJORITY OF YOUR COMPLIANCE HEARINGS.
BOTH CONDITIONS CONTAIN “INITIAL CONTACT” PROVISIONS
ACCUSED MUST CONTACT THE MONITOR WITHIN 5 DAYS OF RELEASE (TO ADVISE THE NAME OF THEIR SERVICE PROVIDER)
FAILING TO CONTACT SHOULD RESULT IN A WARNING NOTICE BEING SENT. SET A FINAL TIME LIMIT.
FURTHER FAILURE RESULTS IN AN ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE.
FAILURE TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE OR FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING RESULTS IN REVOCATION OF BOND AND AN ARREST WARRANT.
CHARGE IS “BOND REVOCATION XYZ OFFENSE”
MAKE SURE A NEW BOND CONDITION IS ISSUED WITH THE WARRANT.

32. NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JAN
FEB
DEFENDANT
BOOK #
ORDER DATE
LAB 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 2 9
DA NUMBER
ALARCON,JOSSUE
AG768
9/28/2014
DATCS N S
WL/N
ALEMAN,JIMMY
AG2903
1/13/2015
J/BO
ARMSTRONG,LARRY
AF8527
9/26/2014
AYALA,JOE
AF5883
5/8/2014 J
AG2344
AYALA,VERONICA
AG255
9/8/2014 AL H P
H/W
1/15/15 DEF NO SHOW-REV WARRANT
AYVAR,JULIAN
AF7171
5/2/2014
DEF PKD UP NEW CHARGE-REV WARRANT-AG1813
BAISDEN,KAGEN
AG2564
12/23/2014 ,
BARKLEY,ANDREUS
AG1228
10/19/2014
H/P F
H/J/BO WL
WATCH FOR MARYJ
BEAMON,ANTHONY L
AG2088
11/28/2014 FC
H/N
BEAMON,AUNTRAYLEON
AF9446
8/5/2014
BEESON,BARRETT
AG2867
1/10/2015
BENNETT,STEVEN
AF9069
7/22/2014
AG3075
BENSON,JACOB
AG2565 ,
BESAW,TERRANCE M
AF7829
5/31/2014 HF
J/W ,
CHECK 1/16/15 REFER NOTES-pkd up new charge 11/4/14 -AG1625
BIVENS,WENDALLJ
AG254
9/5/2014
12/29/14 POS MET,THC,AMP-GIVEN TIL 2/6/15 TO TEST NEG-1/21/15 VISUAL REQUEST
BROOKS JR, RAY ANTHONY
AG2939
1/14/2015
J/BO/N
BROWN,JASON
AG1315
12/1/2014
FT/N *
NEXT TEST DUE 03/08/15
BRYCE,DARRYN
AF8321
6/21/2014 ,
BURBATT,MARQUE A
AG1639
11/6/2014 ,
HOUSTON /25/14 DEF CLD THOUGHT TESTING NI WKLY
BURROSS,KRISTEN M
AG773
CARGAL,AUDREY KAY
AG2449
12/17/2014
CASEY,PHILLIP
AG2962
1/15/2015 ,
CAVINDER,HEIDI L
AG1327
10/24/2014 BO
CERALDI,MARK
AG2533
12/21/2014
ACCU ,
SHELIA PRICE
CHARLESTON,LARREION J
1/28/2015
CLARK,DEBORAH
AG319
DTS
H/W/N ,
PAY LATE AG3106
CLOSE,DESTINY D
AG1716
11/9/2014
CONN,ETHAN
AG744
9/27/2014 ,
AL-1/31/15
CONNELLY,JAMES. W
AF9964
8/28/2014 RH ,
RETEST 3/5/15
COOK,FRANK
AG362
9/10/2014
COOPER,BRYANT
AF9169
7/25/2014
J/H ,
WATCH FOR MARYJ-REV 1/20/15-NEW CHARGES-AG3069
COOPER,CHRISTINE
AG3192
1/26/2015
CORDOVA,WALTER U
AG3032
1/18/2015
MIS
2/3/15 LM/RE:HAIR OR URINE
CRIBB,KELLY
AG630
9/23/2014 ,
DEF PKD UP NEW CHARGES AG1025
CRUZ,RUBY
AG3040
CUMMINGS,MATTHEW LEON
AF9555
8/9/2014 P*
H/W/J ,
AG2959
CYRUS,SHEDRICK
AG2183
12/4/2014
DARCUS,NICHOLAS B
AG1323
FT/P ,
POS COC RESTEST 2/15/15
DAY,MISTY
AF9099
7/23/2014 ,
DEAN,JONATHAN WELLS
AF9559 ,
11/20/14 POS MET/AMP