Download presentation
1
SilvoPasture with Hybrid Poplar and Sheep
GreenWood Resources Columbia Tree Farm Clatskanie, Oregon
2
GreenWood Resources, Inc.
Natural resource management company established in 1996, based in Portland, Oregon
3
GreenWood Resources, Inc.
Currently manage nearly 15,000 acres of hybrid poplar plantations 6,000 acres west of the Cascade Mountains 8,700 acres east of the Cascade Mountains
4
GreenWood Resources, Inc.
World-wide development and management of poplar plantations Development of elite hybrid poplar and cottonwood genotypes France N. America China Japan New Zealand Chile
5
What is Hybrid Poplar? Crosses between Populus species
Black cottonwood (P. trichocarpa) Eastern cottonwood (P. deltoides) Japanese poplar (P. maximowiczii) European black poplar (P. nigra)
6
Creating Hybrid Poplars
Traditional hybridization through controlled pollination, propagation and testing of progeny
7
Uses of Hybrid Poplar Wood products including veneer & lumber
Photo courtesy of British Columbia Ministry of Forestry and Lands
8
Uses of Hybrid Poplar Pulping fibers for the paper industry
9
Uses of Hybrid Poplar Feedstock for energy industry; co-firing with coal and liquid fuels
10
Uses of Hybrid Poplar Land application of municipal effluent
Phytoremediation of industrial sites and waste water treatment
11
Uses of Hybrid Poplar Carbon sequestration
12
The Columbia Tree Farm (CTF)
Established in 1982
13
The Columbia Tree Farm (CTF)
50% owned land, 50% leased
14
The Columbia Tree Farm (CTF)
Initially created to support area pulp and paper mills
15
The Columbia Tree Farm (CTF)
Operate as agriculture, employing many conventional farm practices and equipment
16
Characteristics of the CTF
Soils are loams to silty loams with high organic matter, low clay content Excellent soil nutrient capacity Moderate temperatures throughout the year Rainfall up to 45” annually, primarily in the late fall, winter and spring Plantations were initially planted with 600 to 900 trees-per-acre for rotations of 6 to 8 years
17
CTF Management Strategy
Became independent of paper company in December, 2000 Free to pursue highest value markets for wood products Transition to: Longer rotations, 12 to 15 years Wider spacing, density of 300 trees per acre Pruning in sequential lifts to produce clear lumber Larger piece sizes to maximize board-foot yields
18
Challenges at the CTF Longer period of weed control
Four versus two years Mechanical and chemical control Increased cultivation expense Increased potential for damage from voles where vegetation creates good habitat
19
Purpose of SilvoPasture Trial
Explore the range of plantation ages and stock types where sheep grazing could take place without injurious effects Demonstrate benefits to plantation management and sheep ranching To see if sheep grazing can be an effective means of weed control in wider spaced plantations
20
Test Sites 4 year old trees, from 14” cuttings
21
Test Sites 2 year old trees, from ’ to 6’ tall whips
22
Test Sites 1 year old trees, from large 6’ to 7’ tall whips
23
Test Sites Thirty-six-tree plots were established inside and outside of each grazing plot for evaluation and comparison of tree growth and performance
24
Preparation of Test Plots
Sowed cover crop in April, 2004 Disked between the tree rows Forage oats at 50 lbs per acre Forage rape at 10 lbs per acre 50 lbs N fertilizer per acre
25
Preparation of Test Plots
Oats established well, rape did not establish
26
Preparation of Test Plots
Electric fence and water supplies installed in late July, 2004
27
Introduction of Sheep Sheep placed on August 2nd, 2004
Sheep were 4 to 4½ month old lambs, and weighed 60 to 65 pounds The number of sheep per plot ranged from 7 to 20 head, based on quality and quantity of forage Targeted one month of grazing within each plot Mid-month adjustment made in number of head per plot, based on how rapidly the forage was being consumed and/or trampled
28
Introduction of Sheep Sheep were placed on August 2nd, 2004
29
Introduction of Sheep Sheep were 4 to 4½ month old lambs, and weighed 60 to 65 pounds
30
Introduction of Sheep The number of sheep per plot ranged from 7 to 20 head, based on quality and quantity of forage
31
Introduction of Sheep Targeted one month of grazing within each plot
32
Introduction of Sheep Mid-month adjustment in number of head per plot, based on how rapidly the forage was being consumed and trampled
33
Results from Sheep Grazing
Lambs gained 6 to 7 pounds during 29 days grazing on the test plots Slightly below average weight gain compared to lambs grazing pasture with no supplemental feed Failure of rape reduced the quality of forage; additional weight gains may have been seen had it established Evaluation of the lambs during and at the end of the grazing period showed them to be vigorous and healthy
34
Results in Age 4 Trees Tree Age (years) Treatment
2004 Diameter Increment (inches) 2004 Height Increment (feet) Damage 4 Grazed 1.2 11.2 Minor leaf browsing Control 1.1 11.0 No damage
35
Results in Age 4 Trees
36
Results in Age 2 Trees Tree Age (years) Treatment
2004 Diameter Increment (inches) 2004 Height Increment (feet) Damage 2 Grazed 0.8 7.7 Minor leaf browsing Control 0.7 7.5 No damage
37
Results in Age 1 Trees Tree Age (years) Treatment
2004 Height Increment (feet) Damage 1 Grazed 0.6 17% showed stem and/or terminal damage Control No damage
38
Conclusions Minor positive growth impacts with no damage were seen in the 2 and 4 year old grazing plots Trees age 2 and older can can be grazed successfully Trees that are 1 year old, even if established from whips, suffer unacceptable levels of browse damage Sheep remained healthy and vigorous, but weight gains were not exceptional
39
Observations Careful management of livestock density is critical
Current grazing lease rates in the lower Columbia River area do not justify the expense of sowing a cover crop for forage Grazing only native vegetation could prove more cost effective and might substitute for one or more mechanical cultivations As a result of this trial, approximately 500 sheep were wintered in several fields of the CTF, with favorable results reported by two different ranchers
40
Acknowledgements This study was funded by a grant from Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (WSARE), under project number FW04-109 We wish to acknowledge the contributions of: McClellan “Mac” Stewart, Magruder Farms, Clatskanie, Oregon, for technical assistance in selecting cover crops and managing livestock GMO Forestry Fund 3, Boston, Massachusetts, for their in-kind contribution of the land and tree plantations on which the study was conducted
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.