Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Living with Interference in Unmanaged Wireless Environments David Wetherall, Daniel Halperin and Tom Anderson Intel Research & University of Washington.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Living with Interference in Unmanaged Wireless Environments David Wetherall, Daniel Halperin and Tom Anderson Intel Research & University of Washington."— Presentation transcript:

1 Living with Interference in Unmanaged Wireless Environments David Wetherall, Daniel Halperin and Tom Anderson Intel Research & University of Washington

2 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20082 This talk 1.The problem: inefficient spectrum scheduling in wireless LANs 2.Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) as part of the solution 3.Our USRP-based SIC prototype and experiments See also: –Daniel Halperin’s demo/poster of this work –Michael Buettner’s USRP-based UHF RFID reader

3 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20083 1. Spectrum scheduling via carrier sense Carrier sense (CSMA/CA) used to serialize in-range transmissions Widely used foundation of wireless LANs AP

4 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20084 But CSMA/CA has known inefficiencies Too aggressive in some cases (hidden terminals increase loss) and too conservative in others (exposed terminals lower throughput) AP Exposed terminals Hidden terminals

5 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20085 The costs of CSMA/CA Tweaks mostly trade hidden and exposed terminal cases Today, operate to minimize hidden terminals Carrier sense threshold Link pairs Hidden terminals Exposed terminals today

6 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20086 Towards living with interference Want to increase concurrent transmissions (to boost performance) but mitigate cases with harmful collisions (to reduce loss). Carrier sense threshold Link pairs Hidden terminals Exposed terminals tomorrow How? Interference cancellation will get us there!

7 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20087 2. Conventional SINR Decoding with two transmissions ( + ) Decoding successful (green region) if signal is stronger than combined power of interference and noise: Signal power Interference power Interference too strong Signal received > T = + Noise

8 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20088 Conventional SINR Decoding Decoding unsuccessful (white) if signal is weaker than combined power of interference and noise: Signal power Interference power Interference too strong Signal received = + Noise < T Misses an opportunity – interfering signal not random noise!

9 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 20089 Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) Decode signal with sufficient SINR as before, then model and cancel it, and decode remaining signal. Repeat. = + Signal power Interference power Signal received after cancellation – SINR = + Noise > T SIC can decode multiple packets in a collision! Cancellation: Next decode:

10 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200810 Potential benefits of SIC SIC can successfully decode multiple packets (versus zero or one) during collisions. This has several effects: Reduces loss Improves fairness and predictability Increases overall throughput at the cost of peak individual rate

11 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200811 3. SIC Prototype Adapts SIC for bursty, chaotic networks such as 802.11 –No synchronization, weak knowledge of channel state, multiple receivers Implemented on USRP platform –Zigbee-like PHY coding, similar to low-rate 802.11 –Both conventional and SIC detector for comparison USRP-related limitations –No carrier sense; simulate based on measured behavior –No ACKs due to long rx/tx turnaround time Synchronization Demodulation Approximate signal - 0110 1110 Collision?

12 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200812 Experimental setup & methodology Pairs of nodes send packets with fixed rate and power Workload is set to two-packet collisions at random offsets Consider only “feasible links” with >75% delivery Log waveforms and run through SIC and conventional receivers Use measurements to extrapolate CSMA performance 11 node wireless testbed (PC + USRP) in UW Allen (CSE) building

13 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200813 Measured delivery under interference (two senders and one receiver) Higher SINR sender received reliably because SIC includes resynchronization; otherwise half the time by conventional detector Lower SINR sender recovered by SIC most of the time; nearly always lost by conventional detector Fraction of two-sender/one receiver triples

14 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200814 Extrapolated network behavior with CSMA (two competing links) Conventional receiver sees many worse links and few better links with more spatial reuse (CS threshold). SIC receiver sees many better links and few worse links with more spatial reuse (CS threshold). Fraction of link pairs

15 djw \\ SIC \\ 3 June 200815 Conclusions Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) can improve the use of spectrum by simplifying the wireless LAN scheduling problem –Improves performance, adds robustness to CSMA/CA Early stage, simple experiments on software-defined radio platforms show this benefit. –Assessing feasibility of extending into 802.11n NICs Thank you!


Download ppt "Living with Interference in Unmanaged Wireless Environments David Wetherall, Daniel Halperin and Tom Anderson Intel Research & University of Washington."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google