Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAngela Watson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Literary Digest Poll 1936 election: Franklin Delano Roosevelt vs. Alf Landon Literary Digest had called the election since 1916 Sample size: 2.4 million! Prediction: Roosevelt 43% Actual: Roosevelt: 62% (Literary Digest went bankrupt soon after)
2
What went wrong? Context –9 million unemployed; real income down 1/3 –Landon: “Cut spending” versus Roosevelt: “Balance peoples’ budgets before government’s budget Polling –Survey sent out to 10 million people from subscription list, telephone directories, club membership lists –2.4 million responded
3
Sources of bias Sampling frame not representative –Biased toward better off groups (and more Republican) Voluntary response bias –The anti-Roosevelt forces were angry--- and had a higher response rate!
4
Roosevelt’s percentage –Actual election result: 62% –Literary Digest prediction:43% –Gallup’s prediction of the Digest prediction (based on sample of 2,000)44% –Gallup’s prediction of the election result (based on sample of 50,000)56% Gallup used Random sampling George Gallup did it right
5
The Year the Polls Elected Dewey 1948: Harry Truman (Dem) vs. Thomas Dewey (Rep) All major polls predicted Dewey would win by 5 percentage points (even Gallup)
6
What went wrong? Quota Sampling Each interviewer assigned a fixed quota of subjects in certain categories (race, sex, age) In each category, interviewers free to choose Left room for human choice---and inevitable bias Republicans were easier to reach –Had telephones, permanent addresses, “nicer” neighborhoods Quota sampling abandoned for Random Sampling
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.