Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

February 2002. ODistributed in February 2002 by RA's OGiven to students residing in campus- owned residence halls O1,114 distributed; 655 returned = 59%

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "February 2002. ODistributed in February 2002 by RA's OGiven to students residing in campus- owned residence halls O1,114 distributed; 655 returned = 59%"— Presentation transcript:

1 February 2002

2 ODistributed in February 2002 by RA's OGiven to students residing in campus- owned residence halls O1,114 distributed; 655 returned = 59% return O319 Freshmen, 240 Sophomores, 78 Juniors, 4 Seniors, & 14 graduate, non-degree or other

3 Overall Satisfaction with Performance of RA OTraditional Residence Halls: O5.79 - close to moderate satisfaction OSuite-style Residence Halls: O5.24 - lower end of slight satisfaction OSuite-style residents less satisfied but still slightly satisfied

4 Satisfaction with Opportunity to Participate in Council/Government within Hall OTraditional Residence Halls: O4.75 - neutral to slightly satisfied OSuite-style Residence Halls: O4.19 - neutral OSuite-style residents less satisfied, but not dissatisfied

5 Satisfaction with Ability to Meet Other People in Residence Hall OTraditional Residence Halls: O5.80 - slightly less than moderate satisfaction OSuite-style Residence Halls: O5.51 - slightly to moderately satisfied OSuite-style residents less satisfied, but both are positive ODo suite residents tend to stay w/in own rooms more often?

6 Satisfaction with Residence Hall Enhancing Ability to Live Cooperatively OTraditional Residence Halls: O5.70 - close to moderate satisfaction OSuite-style Residence Halls: O5.48 - slightly to moderately satisfied OSuite residents have more roommates to attempt to live cooperatively with

7 Satisfaction with Residence Hall Enhancing Ability to Resolve Conflicts OTraditional Residence Halls: O5.38 - slight satisfaction OSuite-style Residence Halls: O5.18 -slight satisfaction OMore students in a suite may lead to more conflicts (conflicting interests, etc.)

8 Satisfaction with Ability to Study in Own Room OTraditional Residence Halls: O4.56 - neutral to slightly satisfied OSuite-style Residence Halls: O5.00 - slightly satisfied OSuite-style residents less satisfied, but not dissatisfied OGoes hand-in-hand with privacy -- less roommates may make it easier to study in own room

9 Satisfaction with Degree of Privacy OTraditional Residence Halls: O5.37 - slightly satisfied to moderately satisfied OSuite-style Residence Halls: O4.82 - neutral to slightly satisfied OSuite-style residents much less satisfied OOne roommate vs. several roommates

10 Extent to Which Living in Residence Hall Fulfilled Expectations OTraditional Residence Halls: O4.74 -- neutral to slightly satisfied OSuite-style Residence Halls: O4.65 -- neutral to slightly satisfied OSuite-style residents slightly less satisfied

11 Overall Value of Cost vs. Quality of Residence Hall Experience OTraditional Residence Halls: O3.62 -- neutral to slight dissatisfaction OSuite-style Residence Halls: O3.80 -- neutral with slight dissatisfaction OSuite-style residents more satisfied

12 Overall Satisfaction with Living in Residence Hall  Traditional Residence Halls:  5.34 -- Slightly satisfied  Suite-style Residence Halls:  5.33 -- Slightly satisfied  Overall satisfaction is very similar  Surprising, considering students residing in Traditional Residence Halls typically gave higher ratings

13 Of Interest… OSuite-style residence halls are rated lower on almost every area OWhen asked overall satisfaction, virtually no difference between suite-style residence halls and traditional residence halls OStudents in suite-style halls were much more satisfied with value of cost vs. quality of residence hall experience


Download ppt "February 2002. ODistributed in February 2002 by RA's OGiven to students residing in campus- owned residence halls O1,114 distributed; 655 returned = 59%"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google