1. Magnetism in 4d perovskite oxides Phillip Barton 05/28/10 MTRL 286G Final Presentation

2. Comparison of 3d and 4d magnetism 3d transition metals Fe, Co, and Ni are ferromagnetic, however no 4d or 5d are ferromagnetic (except reports of nanoparticles) 3d orbitals have a smaller spatial extent than 4d, as shown below schematically with s orbitals. Thus, there is minimal interaction between 3d orbitals which results in a small bandwidth and subsequently a large density of states. This satisfies the Stoner criterion and spontaneous spin polarization occurs to reduce the DOS at the Fermi level. Additionally, 3d electrons are more “correlated” (electron-electron interactions matter) as they are packed into smaller orbitals. 4d has increased spin-orbit interaction, larger crystal field splitting 1s orbital interaction 2s orbital interaction

3. SrRuO 3 : The only ferromagnetic 4d perovskite Perovskite – Pnma (No. 62) Ferromagnetic “bad” metal - T C ~ 165 K Δ Ru 4+ is d 4 and experiences an octahedral crystal field DFT LMTO

4. SrRuO 3 : The only ferromagnetic 4d perovskite M sat does not max out at the expected S=1 spin only 2 μ B /Ru as is expected for a d 4 ion in a octahedral crystal field even at very low temperatures and high fields This is evidence for band ferromagnetism Jin et. al, PNAS 105, 7115 (2008). Invar effect – zero thermal expansion Due to freezing of octahedra at low temperatures Bushmeleva et. al, JMMM 305, 491 (2006).

5. SrRuO 3 : The only ferromagnetic 4d perovskite Rhodes Wohlfarth ratio = M sat /μ eff = 2.0 for SrRuO 3 ; indicates itinerant nature P. Rhodes and E. P. Wohlfarth, PRSL 273, 247 (1963).

6. Perovskites distort in response to relative cation size RotationTilt A. M. Glazer, Acta Crystallographica Section B 28, 3384 (1972).

7. Glazer tilt systems describe rotation and tilting Pnma has the tilt system a - b + a -. The +/- indicates in/out of phase while the letter indicates magnitude. The schematic below shows the Pnma tilting pattern in the cubic Perovskite cell. Michael Lufaso – SPUDS and TUBERS abc A. M. Glazer, Acta Crystallographica Section B 28, 3384 (1972).

8. Tilting and rotation in Pnma A. M. Glazer, Acta Crystallographica Section B 28, 3384 (1972). In phase tilting of octahedra down the b axis Out of phase tilting of octahedra down the cubic perovskite a axis

9. (Ca,Sr,Ba)RuO 3 : A-site effect on magnetism Jin et. al, PNAS 105, 7115 (2008). CaRuO 3 is a paramagnetic “bad” metal down to low T. BaRuO 3 is ferromagnetic with a T C of 60 K. Base tilts in the end members are 149, 163, and 180° for Ca, Sr, and Ba in ARuO 3. Ca 1-x Sr x RuO 3 exhibits a Griffith’s phase that is characterized by deviation from ideal Curie-Weiss at the T C of the parent ferromagnetic compound. Enhanced spin- orbit coupling on the Ru 4+ ions suppresses FM Ru-O-Ru coupling. Sr 1-y Ba y RuO 3 follows the Stoner-Wohlfarth model of band ferromagnetism. Strong ionic character of Ba increases the covalency of Ru-O which increases the bandwidth, lowers the DOS, and disrupts the Stoner FM.

10. Sr 1-x Ca x RuO 3 : A-site effect on magnetism Mazin and Singh, PRB 56 2556 (1997). CaRuO 3 on verge of a ferromagnetic instability Distortion broadens a singularity in the DOS that occurs at E F for a cubic system Some t 2g – e g covalency, but the bands narrow and the t 2g – e g gap grows A psuedogap opens up near EF which opposes magnetism Covalency between Ru and O – some of the moment resides on O Rondinelli et. al, PRB 78, 155107 (2008).

11. Sr 1-x Ca x RuO 3 : A-site effect on magnetism Cao et. al, PRB 56 321 (1997). Different results that show almost immediate ordering upon substitution

12. Sr 1-x Pb x RuO 3 : A-site effect on magnetism Cheng et. al, PRB 81 134412 (2010). Pb substitution causes distortion due to its lone pairs rather than size difference Pb 2+ ionic radius ~ 1.19 for z=6 and 1.49 for z=12. With Ru 4+ z=6 ~ 0.620 and Sr 2+ z=12 ~ 1.44 it is likely that Pb sits on the A-site. Strange behaviors may be due to impurity phases. Cao et. al, PRB 54, 15144 (1996).

13. References C.-Q. Jin †, J.-S. Zhou §, J. B. Goodenough §, Q. Q. Liu †, J. G. Zhao †, L. X. Yang †, Y. Yu †, R. C. Yu †, T. Katsura ¶, A. Shatskiy ¶, and E. Ito ¶, PNAS 105, 7115 (2008). I. I. Mazin and D. J. Singh, PRB 56, 2556 (1997). A. M. Glazer, Acta Crystallographica Section B 28, 3384 (1972). James M. Rondinelli, Nuala M. Caffrey, Stefano Sanvito, and Nicola A. Spaldin, PRB 78, 155107 (2008). P. Rhodes and E. P. Wohlfarth, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 273, 247 (1963). G. Cao, S. McCall, M. Shepard, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, PRB 56, 321 (1997). S. N. Bushmeleva, V. Y. Pomjakushin, E. V. Pomjakushina, D. V. Sheptyakov, and A. M. Balagurov, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 305, 491 (2006). J.-G. Cheng, J.-S. Zhou, and J. B. Goodenough, PRB 81 134412 (2010).