1. Eileen Hileman Administrative Assistant for School Nutrition Programs MS, RD.... Pam Heimbach

2. VERIFICATION Confirmation of Eligibility for Free and Reduced Price Meals Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

3. ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS  Alternate Sample Size Options: #1 – 3% Random: the lesser of 3 percent of, or 3,000 approved applications selected at random from approved applications OR #2 – 1% Focused Plus: the lesser of 1 percent of all applications selected from error prone applications or 1,000 error prone applications, PLUS the lesser of 1/2 of 1 percent of, or 500, approved applications that provided a case number (in lieu of income information) showing participation in food stamps or a State TANF program Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

4.  Alternate Sample Size Options (continued): To be eligible to use one of the Alternate Sample Sizes, the LEA's non-response rate for the preceding school year is less than 20%.  Application: form completed by household to apply for free or reduced price meals  ASP: Afterschool Snack Program Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

5.  Basic Sample Size – 3% Focused: the lesser of 3 percent of all approved applications, as of the first operating day in October, selected from error prone applications; OR 3,000 error prone applications approved by the LEA, as of the first operating day in October  Categorically Eligible: children included on a household application that includes a Food Stamp or TANF case number on which free meal eligibility is determined Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

6.  Confirmation Review: review of all applications selected for verification to check the accuracy of the initial eligibility determination prior to conducting any other verification activity. This confirmation review must be done by an individual other than the individual who made the initial eligibility determination. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

7.  Direct Certification: an alternative method for certifying children eligible for free meals. Information is obtained from the PA Department of Public Welfare by PDE and provided to SFAs of children from households receiving FS benefits and/or children receiving TANF benefits. An application from the household is not required. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

8.  Direct Verification: the process under which LEAs verifying household applications approved for free or reduced price school meals use data maintained by the Food Stamp Program to verify the household's eligibility without contacting the household Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

9.  Error Prone Applications: an approved household application that (a) indicates monthly income that is within $100 or an annual income that is within $1,200, of the income eligibility limitation for free or reduced price meals; or by criteria established by the Secretary of Agriculture  FS: Food Stamps Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

10.  Income Documentation: documentation of income for any point in time between the month prior to application and the time the household is required to provide income documentation  Income/Household Size Application: applications for free or reduced price meals that were approved based on household income and household size. This includes foster child applications. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

11.  LEA: Local Educational Agency  Non-response: an application for which the verification process could not be completed by November 15  Non-response Rate: the percentage of approved household applications selected for verification for which verification information has not been obtained by the LEA after attempted verification under direct verification or household verification Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

12.  Notice of Adverse Action: letter notifying household that their eligibility changed from free or reduced price to paid or from free to reduced price  NSLP: National School Lunch Program Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

13.  Provision 2/3 Schools: optional alternatives for Free and Reduced Price Meal Application and claiming procedures in the NSLP and SBP which are available to those SFAs with schools in which at least 80 percent of the enrolled children are eligible for free or reduced price meals, or schools which are currently, or who will be serving all children meals at no charge Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

14.  RCCI: Residential Child Care Institution; a SFA that serves children 7 days per week, 24 hours per day  Reinstated Application: an application that has been verified and changed to paid and household was sent a notice of adverse action. Sometime after the effective date of the change to paid, household reapplies and is determined to be eligible for free or reduced price meals again. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

15.  SBP: School Breakfast Program  SFA: School Food Authority; the governing body which is responsible for the administration of one or more schools, and has the legal authority to operate the NSLP, SBP, ASP and/or SMP  SMP: Special Milk Program  TANF: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

16.  Third Party Contractor: A LEA may contract (under standards established by the Secretary of Agriculture) with a third party to assist the LEA in carrying out follow-up activities.  Verification of Sample: Each school year, a LEA shall verify eligibility of the children in a sample of NEW household applications approved for the school year by the LEA. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS

17. The Process VERIFICATION Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

18.  Children directly certified, migrant, homeless, runaway  RCCIs, except for day students  Non-pricing programs, claim paid only  SMP schools  SFAs in which all schools participate in Provision 2 or 3, non-base years Exceptions from Verification Requirements Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

19.  The process that confirms eligibility  Must occur after the application is approved  Must use one of the approved sampling methods 1. Basic Sample Size – 3% Focused 2. Alternate Sample Size #1 – 3% Random 3. Alternate Sample Size #2 – 1% Focused Plus Verification Requirements Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

20. Example of how to determine non-response rate for the 2005-06 school year Determine Non-response Rate  In school year 2004-2005, a LEA has a total of 500 approved applications, the sample size was 15 and the number of applications for which there was no response was 3.  Divide 3 by 15 = 20% Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

21.  Since the non-response rate was NOT less than 20%, the LEA must use the Basic Sample Size (3% Focused) method of selecting the applications to be verified.  If the non-response rate was less than 20%, the LEA may use one of the Alternate Sample Size Options. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 Determining Sample Size for Non-response Rate

22.  If there are not enough error prone applications for Basic Sample Size - 3% Focused or Alternate Sample Size - #2 – 1% Focused Plus, LEAs must randomly select additional applications to meet the sample size required. Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 Determining Sample Size for Non-response Rate

23.  To calculate your non-response rate for the 2004 School Year, access the Verification Procedures Questionnaire submitted for the 2004-2005 School Year.  Add the responses given to the following questions: 17e(1)+17e(3)+17f(1)  and divide by the response in number 13 (the number of applications selected for verification). Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 Determine Your Non-response Rate

24.  Any LEA with preceding school year non- response rate less than 20%  Large LEAs with 10% improvement in non- response rate  For SY 2005-06 only, large LEAs that attempt direct verification from 2 sources – FS and TANF Eligibility for Alternate #1 or #2 Sample Sizes Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

25. 1.Determine sample size, based on number of new applications on file on the first operating day of October 2.Conduct confirmation review. LEAs may “decline” up to 5% of their verification sample and replace them with other approved applications. 3.Exception: Confirmation review waived if the LEA uses a “technology-based solution” that makes accurate eligibility determinations. Verification Process Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

26. A.Correct the household’s eligibility status; B.Notify the household of the change and explain changes; and C.Allow household to reapply and provide documentation Confirmation Reviews If the initial determination is incorrect, the LEA must: Verification Process Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

27. 4.If a confirmation review indicates that a household is eligible, the LEA must proceed to verify the application. 5.Notify household of selection for verification 6.LEA must include a toll-free number (call without charge). Verification Process Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

28. 7.Conduct necessary follow-up activities 8.If household does not respond to verification requests, LEA must make at least one additional attempt to obtain verification. 9.LEAs may contract with a third party to assist with “follow-up.” Verification Process Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005

29. 10.Maintain results of verification to have data necessary to complete Verification Summary Report 11.Complete verification process by November 15 by notifying households of the results of verification Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 Verification Process

30. VERIFICATION Changes in Child Nutrition Program Law and Regulations Pennsylvania Department of Education, June 2005 Report to the State Agency