Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER. CONTROVERSY-In General  Little evidence to support DX or TX.  Comorbidity with other Axis I & II is so significant that.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER. CONTROVERSY-In General  Little evidence to support DX or TX.  Comorbidity with other Axis I & II is so significant that."— Presentation transcript:

1 REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER

2 CONTROVERSY-In General  Little evidence to support DX or TX.  Comorbidity with other Axis I & II is so significant that it gets lost.  DX may disappear in DSM V  Emerging info on genetic, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical data on early stress will shape our understanding of attachment disruption.

3 References  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry  National Child Traumatic Stress Network – DSM V

4 RAD  “ is the clinical disorder that defines distinctive patterns of aberrant behavior in young children who have been maltreated or raised in environments that limit opportunities to form selective attachments.”

5 ACAP Practice Parameters (American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry)  Children with RAD  Extreme neglect  Abnormal social behaviors  Lack of responsiveness  Excessive inhibition  Hypervigilance  Indiscriminate sociability  Disorganized attachment behaviors

6 Etiology  Early Care – after 6 mos but before 3 yrs  Persistent disregard of child’s basic emotional needs for comfort, stimulation and affection  Persistent disregard of child’s basic physical needs  Repeated changes of primary caregiver

7 What is known  Attachment disturbance can occur in residential settings where infants must rely on a large number of caregivers  Lack of attachment is rare  Does not occur without serious neglect  Stressed kids seek comfort from caregiver  RAD kids resist comfort

8 What is known  Persistence over time unlikely  Attachments are compromised  Indiscriminate sociability  These kids a handful for adoptive parents  No validated measures for middle childhood, adolescence and adulthood  Dx relies on history

9 Problems with DX  No clinical data establishing Efficacy of Dx  Little TX research  Little longitudinal research  No solid outcome research

10 Problems with Dx –DSM V?  Is attachment a disorder of diagnosis? OR OR  Is RAD a symptom of neglect and trauma that fits into a Developmental Trauma Disorder?

11 National Child Traumatic Stress Network Developmental Trauma Taskforce

12 Developmental Trauma Disorder  Exposure  Multiple or chronic  Abandonment  Betrayal  Sexual assaults  Neglect  Coercive practices  Emotional abuse  Witnessing

13 Developmental Trauma Disorder SSSSubjective experience RRRRage BBBBetrayal FFFFear RRRResignation SSSShame

14  Triggered pattern of repeated dysregulation in response to trauma cues  Some type of PTSD  Affect  Somatic  Behavioral  Cognitive  Relational  Self-care

15 Developmental Trauma Disorder  Regulation Strategy  Anticipation  Coping  Restorative  Disorganized

16 Developmental Trauma Disorder  Impact on other Disorders  Substance Abuse  Bipolar  Depression  Somatization

17 Developmental Trauma Disorder  Expectations  Negative self-attribution  Loss of protective caretaker  Loss of protection of others  Loss of trust in the system to protect  Expecting to be victimized in future

18 Developmental Trauma Disorder  Functional Impairment  Scholastic  Familial  Peer  Legal  Vocational

19 Attachment and Trauma  “The security of attachment bonds seems to be the most important mitigating factor against trauma-induced disorganization. In contrast, trauma that affects the safety of attachment bonds interferes with the capacity to integrate sensory, emotional and cognitive information into a cohesive whole and sets the stage for unfocused and irrelevant responses to subsequent stress.” (van der Kolk, 2003)

20 Core Features  Excessive attempts to receive comfort and affection OR  Extreme reluctance to initiate or accept comfort or affection

21 Additional Features  Disturbed and developmentally inappropriate social relatedness  Not as a result of a developmental delay  Onset before age five  Requires a history of significant neglect  Lack of identifiable, preferred attachment figures

22 AACAP Guidelines for TX  Provide an emotionally attachment figure  Assess caregivers attitude toward and perceptions about the kid  Creating positive interactions with caregivers  Kids with aggressive or oppositional behaviors will require other Tx

23 Trauma Processing  Safety  Stress Reducing Resources  Surface and Engage trauma  Transfer therapeutically (“Forget”)  Review child’s formulation of trauma

24 Maslow’s Hierarchy

25


Download ppt "REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER. CONTROVERSY-In General  Little evidence to support DX or TX.  Comorbidity with other Axis I & II is so significant that."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google