Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES IN CALIFORNIA Jeff Mitchell Department of Plant Sciences University of California, Davis Conservation Farming Systems.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES IN CALIFORNIA Jeff Mitchell Department of Plant Sciences University of California, Davis Conservation Farming Systems."— Presentation transcript:

1 CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES IN CALIFORNIA Jeff Mitchell Department of Plant Sciences University of California, Davis Conservation Farming Systems Session Resource Management Track 3 Regency B International Conference on The Future of Agriculture: Science, Stewardship and Sustainability Hyatt Regency Sacramento Sacramento, CA August 8, 2006

2 Collaborators Anil Shrestha. Tom Barcellos. John Beyer Dan Munk
Collaborators Anil Shrestha Tom Barcellos John Beyer Dan Munk Jim Couto Rob Roy Will Horwath Andy Zylstra Bob Fry Steve Wright Dino Giacomazzi Johnnie Silizinoff Herman Meister Mark Borba Mike McElhiney Randy Southard Scott Schmidt Brooks Englehardt Nick Madden Andrew Clark Steve Hill Kurt Hembree Fred Leavitt Herman Meister Steve Fortner Ron Harben Karen Klonsky John Diener Julie Baker Darrell Cordova Alan Wilcox Gene Miyao Helmut Klauer Ralph Cesena, Sr. Howard Ferris Jonathan Avila Jon Bjornberg Tom Lanini Tony Turkovich Andrew Siebert Lee Jackson Larry Beckstead Wes Wallender Bill McCloskey Bob Hutmacher Steve Husman Allen DuSault Jaime Solorio Kristen Hughes Ed Scott Mike Buser Ladi Asgill Lyle Carter

3 OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION -. development of resource-conserving crop
OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION - development of resource-conserving crop production systems in California - toward wider adoption - examples of leading conservation tillage innovation - anticipating future tillage systems

4

5

6 Iowa, 2001 Iowa, 2001 Brazil, 2004 Georgia, 2001

7

8 (Conservation Technology Information Center, Lafayette, IN, 2002)
Conservation tillage practices have increased by 300% in the Midwest during the last decade. In California however, less than 0.3% of crop acreage is farmed using conservation tillage practices. (Conservation Technology Information Center, Lafayette, IN, 2002)

9 California CT Survey 2004 Cotton Tomatoes Dry edible beans Corn silage
Minimum Tillage Other Tillage <30% Residue Cover after Planting >40% Reduction in total passes <30% Residue Cover after Planting Crops to survey for Minimum Tillage No Till RT / ST Mulch Till Total Acreage Subtotal Cotton Tomatoes Dry edible beans Corn silage Corn for grain Small grains for grain Sml grains, hay or ensiled Melons 2,000 200 2,855 410 200 490 1,000 150 5,000 20,000 15,000 200 2,000 1,200 3,795 5,000 20,410 15,000 39,536 2,000 6,000 20,553 5,000 520 964 612,852 228,756 39,705 322,330 125,554 267,255 793,052 652,388 230,756 45,705 342,883 130,554 288,185 809,016 RT/ST = Ridge Till and Strip Till *Corn Silage and small grain forage will usually be double cropped together

10 Mitchell et al., In preparation

11 Mitchell et al., In preparation

12 “The San Joaquin Valley is currently classified as a serious non-attainment region for PM10 under both state and federal standards. “ Dec. 30, 2004 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

13 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (CMP) PLANNING
A handbook of CMP’s has been developed from which growers can choose practices (including conservation tillage) aimed at minimizing agricultural PM10 emissions. July 1, 2004

14 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Conservation Management Practices are farming activities that reduce the “normal” amount of dust produced by agricultural operations. The practices have been developed by farmers, farm groups, NRCS, RCD, the Air District, the Farm Bureau, and other groups. CMPs fall into one or more categories: - Reducing or eliminating the need to disturb the soil - Protecting the soil from the wind - Modifying equipment - Applying dust suppressants - Reducing speed on unpaved roads - Burning alternatives - Reducing pesticide application July 1, 2004

15 Opportunities for Offsetting Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Croplands . . . Less tillage Increase crop intensity, reduce fallow Use of cover crops Fertility and water management High biomass crops Rangeland or Pasture . . . Management of marginal lands Adding legumes Improved grazing management Fertility and water management Animal Agriculture. . . Improved feed and forage Methane capture

16 Possible benefits of conservation tillage - saves fuel - saves soil - saves time - saves labor - saves machinery - permits timely planting - reduces run-off - increases soil moisture - increases soil organic matter - sequesters carbon - improves habitat for beneficial organisms Dr. Sharad Phatak, University of Georgia, dust (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions mitigation - surface water (sediment, nutrient and pesticide) runoff reduction (?)

17 Conservation Tillage:
1) a wide range of crop production practices that minimize or eliminate primary, or intercrop tillage operations such as disking, plowing, chiseling, ripping, and 2) manage residues to enable efficient planting, harvesting and pest management

18 Keeping the CT paradigm broad

19 Minimum Tillage Approaches
(Non-Permanent Bed Systems)

20 Minimum Tillage Implements, 2004
(Non-permanent Bed Systems)

21 Minimum Tillage Approaches (Permanent Bed Systems)

22

23 C O N S E R V A T I O N T I L L A G E CONSERVATION TILLAGE
Row Crop System Development • Cover Crop Residues Single Crop CT Development Integrated Systems Development Species selection ongoing Tomatoes ongoing Tomato - Cotton ongoing Water Use ongoing Melons Wheat - Tomato ongoing Water Balance / Runoff ongoing Cotton ongoing Corn - Tomato ongoing Pollution Reduction ongoing Squash ongoing CONSERVATION TILLAGE Cropping Systems

24 Conservation / Standard Tillage Comparison Study (1999 – ongoing)
With cover crop Without cover crop Conservation Tillage With cover crop Without cover crop An example of developing alternative tillage systems

25 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 1)
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 1) tomato / cotton rotation with and without winter triticale/rye/common vetch cover crops 2) 10 X 90 m plots, replicated 4 times in RCBD 3) “reduce tillage to greatest extent possible” in CT systems 4) monitor all inputs and operations for economic analysis 5) machine harvest yield determinations

26 Standard Tillage Tomato System (Coming Out of Cotton)
Year 1 (going into tomatoes) • shred cotton stalks • undercut cotton plants • disk 2X • chisel • list • cultimulch • winter weed control • apply preplant herbicide • recultimulch beds • transplant tomatoes • irrigate • cultivate • fertilize • harvest Year 2 (going into cotton) • flail chop tomato residue • disk 2X • chisel • disk • list • winter weed control • apply preplant herbicide • plant cotton • irrigate • cultivate • fertilize • harvest

27 Conservation Tillage Tomato System (Coming Out of Cotton)
Year 1 (going into tomatoes) • shred and undercut cotton • sweep furrows • spring herbicide application • transplant tomatoes • irrigate • cultivate • harvest Year 2 (going into cotton) • spring herbicide application • plant cotton • irrigate • cultivate • fertilize • harvest

28 Conservation tillage system following tomato harvest and before cotton planting
Five Points, CA 2000

29

30

31 Postharvest cotton stalk management consisting of one-pass shredding
and root undercutting and a second pass to sweep out the furrows Five Points, CA, 2002


Download ppt "CONSERVATION TILLAGE PRACTICES IN CALIFORNIA Jeff Mitchell Department of Plant Sciences University of California, Davis Conservation Farming Systems."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google