1. Don DeRosa, Science Methods Professor, SED Carol Jenkins, Language Arts Methods Professor, SED Julia Badiali, 4 th Grade Teacher, Trotter School Brenda Richardson, Science Specialist, Trotter School Kelly Majmudar, BU/Trotter School Partnership Coordinator Immersive Methods Courses for Pre-Service Teachers

2. The Problem Traditional methods courses for pre-service teachers take place on the university campus in isolation of what occurs in elementary school classrooms. Pre-service teachers imagine or role play what the pedagogy will look like with real students. “One-third of America’s new teachers leave teaching sometime during their first three years and almost half depart after the first five years,” especially those in low- income urban schools (Fulton, Burns, & Goldenberg, 2005).

3. Professional Learning Community Collaboration between institute of higher education (IHE) and urban public school TheoryPractice Emerging Methods Program

4. Trotter Elementary School Race/Ethnicity% of School African American67.4 Hispanic27.1 White2.5 Multi-Racial/Non- Hispanic 2.8 Title% of School First Language not English11.3 Limited English Proficient8.3 Low-income82.7 Special Education9.5 Free Lunch81.2 Reduced Lunch1.5 GenderEnrollment Male187 Female212 Total399

5. Stakeholders PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY Junior Elementary Education Majors Trotter Elementary Students Boston University Faculty Trotter School Faculty

6. Framework of the Methods Class Language Arts Methods and Science Methods Meets one day/week at Trotter School BU Faculty and Trotter Faculty serve as co-instructors SCIENCE 2 hours in science methods class 1 hour of immersion experience with observation, coaching, and teaching in elementary science classroom LANGUAGE ARTS 2 hours of Language Arts methods class 30 minutes of observation of elementary writer’s workshop class 30 minutes of teaching experience as a writing tutor

7. The Team Dean Coleman Principal Nolan DonBrenda JuliaCarol Kelly

8. Mutual Benefits Pre-Service Teachers– merging of practical experience with theory, mentorship of in-service teachers Trotter Students-- more individualized attention, enthusiastic undergrads, university resources BU and Trotter Faculty-- professional dialogue about theory and practice

9. Challenges Merging the university and public school schedules Finding time for collaboration and planning Logistics of transportation Time and materials divided between physical locations Model for co-teaching IHE faculty-- acknowledgement for retention, tenure, and promotion

10. Early Indicators Self-efficacy Interviews with stakeholders Interviews with practicum students

11. Evaluation Plans Compare pre- and post- surveys of pre-service teacher’s science teaching self-efficacy Compare pre and post surveys of pre-service teachers’ interest in urban teaching placements Track pre-service teachers for up to five years using the following strategies: Observation of teaching practice Collection of lesson plans Annual testing of self-efficacy, views of the nature of science, and beliefs about teaching science compared to other subjects Annual interviews Survey number of teachers who choose urban teaching placements

12. Implications for Other Programs Courses for other majors may also benefit from merging theory and practice in a similar model. Consider: partnering with businesses partnering with service sites offering courses that are co-taught by professionals in the field offering courses held in authentic settings Build partnerships from the ground-up Ensure benefits for all stakeholders