Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada

2 Nano-beam Scheme The scheme proposed by P. Raimondi and SuperB Group.
Squeeze y* as small as possible: 0.27/0.41 mm. Assume beam-beam parameter = 0.09 which has been already achieved at KEKB. Change beam energies 3.5 / 8 -> 4 /7 GeV to achieve longer Touschek lifetime and mitigate the effect of intra-beam scattering in LER.

3 Parameter Optimization
Main parameters can be quickly optimized with this panel.

4 Beam Parameters KEKB Design KEKB Achieved : with crab SuperKEKB
High-Current SuperKEKB Nano-Beam Energy (GeV) (LER/HER) 3.5/8.0 4.0/7.0 by* (mm) 10/10 5.9/5.9 3/6 0.27/0.42 ex (nm) 18/18 18/24 24/18 3.2/2.4 sy(mm) 1.9 0.94 0.85/0.73 0.059 xy 0.052 0.129/0.090 0.3/0.51 0.09/0.09 sz (mm) 4 ~ 6 5/3 6/5 Ibeam (A) 2.6/1.1 1.64/1.19 9.4/4.1 3.6/2.6 Nbunches 5000 1584 2503 Luminosity (1034 cm-2 s-1) 1 2.11 53 80

5 SuperKEKB x 40 Gain in Luminosity e- 2.6 A
Colliding bunches Belle II New IR e- 2.6 A New superconducting /permanent final focusing quads near the IP SuperKEKB New beam pipe & bellows e+ 3.6 A Replace long TRISTAN dipoles with shorter ones (HER) Add / modify RF systems for higher beam current Low emittance positrons to inject Positron source Redesign the HER arcs to squeeze the emittance Damping ring New positron target / capture section Low emittance gun TiN-coated beam pipe with antechambers Low emittance electrons to inject x 40 Gain in Luminosity

6 Comparison of Parameters
KEKB Design KEKB Achieved : with crab SuperKEKB Nano-Beam Energy (GeV) (LER/HER) 3.5/8.0 4.0/7.0 by* (mm) 10/10 5.9/5.9 0.27/0.41 ex (nm) 18/18 18/24 3.2/2.4 sy(mm) 1.9 0.94 0.059 xy 0.052 0.129/0.090 0.09/0.09 sz (mm) 4 ~ 6 6/5 Ibeam (A) 2.6/1.1 1.64/1.19 3.6/2.62 Nbunches 5000 1584 2503 Luminosity (1034 cm-2 s-1) 1 2.11 80 SuperKEKB

7 Beam Energy In SuperKEKB, the beam energy is changed to decrease the effect of the intra-beam scattering in LER, especially to make longer Touschek lifetime. LER: 3.5 GeV → 4 GeV HER: 8 GeV → 7 GeV In HER, the lower beam energy makes lower emittance. SuperKEKB

8 Luminosity Target Luminosity is 8x1035 cm-2s-1 in SuperKEKB.
Three fundamental parameters to determine the luminosity. If sx* = sx+* = sx-* and sy* = sy+* = sy-*, S = 1+sy*/sx* (aspect ratio of the beam size at IP). where Target Luminosity is 8x1035 cm-2s-1 in SuperKEKB. SuperKEKB

9 Beam-Beam Parameter KEKB Design KEKB Achieved : with crab
SuperKEKB Nano-Beam Energy (GeV) (LER/HER) 3.5/8.0 4.0/7.0 by* (mm) 10/10 5.9/5.9 0.27/0.41 ex (nm) 18/18 18/24 3.2/2.4 sy(mm) 1.9 0.94 0.059 xy 0.052 0.129/0.090 0.09/0.09 sz (mm) 4 ~ 6 6/5 Ibeam (A) 2.6/1.1 1.64/1.19 3.6/2.62 Nbunches 5000 1584 2503 Luminosity (1034 cm-2 s-1) 1 2.11 80 SuperKEKB

10 Beam-Beam Parameter The maximum value of the beam-beam parameter is assumed to be 0.09 in SuperKEKB. The beam-beam parameter of 0.09 has been achieved in KEKB. The horizontal beam-beam parameter becomes very small in the nano-beam scheme. xx~0.0028 Dynamic effects is also small since the small horizontal beam-beam parameter and the horizontal betatron tune is far from 0.5. SuperKEKB

11 Beam-Beam Simulation Beam-beam simulation gives 8x1035 cm-2s-1
Difference between with and without the crab-waist is not so large. L = 8x1035 LER W-S SuperKEKB

12 Vertical Beta Function at IP
KEKB Design KEKB Achieved : with crab SuperKEKB Nano-Beam Energy (GeV) (LER/HER) 3.5/8.0 4.0/7.0 by* (mm) 10/10 5.9/5.9 0.27/0.41 ex (nm) 18/18 18/24 3.2/2.4 sy(mm) 1.9 0.94 0.059 xy 0.052 0.129/0.090 0.09/0.09 sz (mm) 4 ~ 6 6/5 Ibeam (A) 2.6/1.1 1.64/1.19 3.6/2.62 Nbunches 5000 1584 2503 Luminosity (1034 cm-2 s-1) 1 2.11 80 SuperKEKB

13 Vertical Beta Function at IP
By using the modern technique, the vertical beta function can be squeezed to be a few hundred micron at most. by* ~ 1/20 of KEKB Hourglass effect (HG) is a serious problem to squeeze the beta function in the head-on collision. In order to satisfy HG, a collision of narrow beams with a large crossing angle is adopted. This is “nano-beam scheme”. However, dynamic aperture (DA) will be reduced because of the nonlinear fringe, and kinematic terms in the interaction region (IR), and also strong sextupoles. Natural chromaticity LER: xx/xy = -104/-789 HER: xx/xy = -187/-853 LER: xx/xy = -72/-123 HER: xx/xy = -70/-124 SuperKEKB KEKB SuperKEKB

14 Hourglass requirement
Collision Scheme High Current Scheme Nano-Beam Scheme sz sx* d 2f Head-on Half crossing angle: f overlap region = bunch length overlap region (≠ bunch length) Hourglass requirement Hourglass requirement ~5 mm ~ mm SuperKEKB

15 Hourglass Effect for Nano-Beam
2sx- 2sx+ d1 d2 LER waist e+ e- With crab-waist, this term is zero There are two kinds of hourglass requirements. Hourglass (H.G) requirement without crab-waist: SuperKEKB

16 Beta Function at IP Machine parameters are chosen to be insensitive to the HG effect. The vertical beta function: The vertical beta functions in both rings satisfy the HG requirement. To squeeze by*, low emittance and low bx* are needed. SuperKEKB

17 Nonlinear Terms around IP
K L* Phys. Rev. E47, 2010 (1993) LER KEKB L R SuperKEKB by* (mm) 5.9 0.27 K (1/m2) -1.777 -1.778 -4.425 -6.003 L* (m) 1.332 1.762 0.7269 0.7680 Jy0 / A 8.425 4.221

18 Beam Current KEKB Design KEKB Achieved : with crab SuperKEKB Nano-Beam
Energy (GeV) (LER/HER) 3.5/8.0 4.0/7.0 by* (mm) 10/10 5.9/5.9 0.27/0.41 ex (nm) 18/18 18/24 3.2/2.4 sy(mm) 1.9 0.94 0.059 xy 0.052 0.129/0.090 0.09/0.09 sz (mm) 4 ~ 6 6/5 Ibeam (A) 2.6/1.1 1.64/1.19 3.6/2.62 Nbunches 5000 1584 2503 Luminosity (1034 cm-2 s-1) 1 2.11 80 SuperKEKB

19 Luminosity gain is 1(xy) x 20(1/by*) x 2(I) = 40 times of KEKB.
Beam Current In order to achieve the target luminosity, the beam current in nano-beam scheme becomes twice of KEKB. The highest beam current is 2 A in LER and 1.4 A in HER at the KEKB operation. 1.8 A in LER / 1.35 A in HER at physics run In SuperKEKB, the design beam currents are 3.6 A for LER and 2.62 A for HER. Number of bunches is 2503 to get the suitable density of the overlap region (alternate buckets filled). Bunch current becomes 1.44 mA in LER and 1.05 mA in HER. Luminosity gain is 1(xy) x 20(1/by*) x 2(I) = 40 times of KEKB. Then, we get 8x1035 cm-2s-1 SuperKEKB

20 Crossing Angle The full crossing angle is 83 mrad in SuperKEKB.
Separation of two beams is necessary to put final focusing magnets closer to IP as much as possible. This affects the magnet design and the dynamic aperture. The angle between the solenoid axis and the beam line is 41.5 mrad, respectively. This angle is determined by optimization of the vertical emittance generated by SR from the solenoid fringe. SuperKEKB

21 Emittance Redesign of arc cells to make low emittance
(hx:dispersion) Redesign of arc cells to make low emittance 2.5 p non-interleaved sextupole cell (-I’ connection) chromaticity is corrected and nonlinear kick is cancelled. LER (4 GeV) Longer bending radius is adopted. HER (7 GeV) Number of cells increases to reduce dispersion. SuperKEKB

22 Emittance Local chromaticity correction (LCC) is necessary to correct large chromaticity generated in the vicinity of IP. However, the LCC generates some emittance to make dispersion region. The emittance generation at the LCC should be reduced as much as possible. This is a trade-off between DA and emittance. SuperKEKB

23 Emittance In SuperKEKB, the horizontal emittance is 3.2 nm in LER and 2.4 nm in HER, respectively. 2.7 nm in LER and 2.3 nm in HER at the zero beam current Coupling parameter of 0.4 % in LER and 0.35 % in HER are assumed. (challenging!) Vertical emittance induced by SR from solenoid fringe field can not be ignored. (suggested by E. Perevedentev) In order to suppress it, rate of change of Bz should be reduced and/or decrease angle between the solenoid axis and the beam axis. Machine error also should be reduced and corrected. SuperKEKB

24 Vertical Emittance originated from Solenoid Fringe
Crossing angle = LER angle + HER angle = 83 mrad proportional to q4 Solenoid axis = angle bisector Energy ratio 4/(4+7) We choose 41.5 mrad and the contribution of solenoid fringe is ~4 pm. SuperKEKB

25 Bunch Length In SuperKEKB, the bunch length is 6 mm in LER and 5 mm in HER which are similar to the present KEKB. The “bunch length” means a value includes intra-beam scattering and wake field from the ring impedance at the design beam current. SuperKEKB

26 = Nano-Beam Scheme Head-on Frame narrow and long bunch
with large crossing angle short bunch with head-on = Y. Ohnishi / KEK

27 Parameter Consideration
In SuperKEKB, the luminosity performance depends on the lattice performance significantly. Especially, Touschek lifetime becomes serious in the nano-beam scheme due to lack of DA. Target lifetime is 600 sec in both rings. The large DA in the momentum direction is necessary. Transverse aperture is also necessary for the “betatron injection”. If enough transverse aperture cannot be kept, “synchrotron injection” should be considered. The emittance of the injected beam should be small, therefore e+ damping ring (DR) and RF-gun are considered. Y. Ohnishi / KEK

28 IR design HER LER Detector solenoid axis
QC2LP Horz. F PM LER QC2RE Horz. F PM HER QC1RE Vert. f QC1LP Vert. f 41.5 mrad Detector solenoid axis IP 41.5 mrad QC2LE Horz. F PM QC1RP Vert. f QC1LE Vert. f QC2RP Horz. F LER and HER beam are focused by separated quadrupole doublet, respectively SuperKEKB

29 IR Magnets design Use both of superconducting magnets and permanent magnets Superconducting magnets Leakage fields of superconducting magnets are canceled by correction windings on the other beam pipe Warm bore Permanent magnets for QC2LE, QC2LP, QC2RE Pros. Cryostats are small Assembly of vacuum chamber can be simple Vacuum pump can be located near IP Cons. Need to develop a permanent magnet Fine temperature control is required Extra magnets are required to change beam energies SuperKEKB

30 IR design with PM version
N. Ohuchi Cryostat Anti solenoid-R QC1LP +corr. coil QC1RE +corr coil QC2RE PM QC2LP PM IP QC2LE PM QC2RP +corr. coil QC1LE +corr. coil QC1RP +corr. coil Anti solenoid-L Cryostat QC1RE SuperKEKB

31 The magnet design of QC1R/L-P
N. Ohuchi Vac ch ID 20mm Magnet Parameters Magnet inner radius=22 mm, outer radius=27.55 mm Magnet current=1511 A Field gradient=75.61 T/m Current density, JSC= A/mm2 Magnetic length Leff = m Peak field w/o solenoids = 2.24 T Operation temperature = 4.4 K Cable Parameters Size =2.5mm  0.93mm Number of SC strand=10 Diameter of the strand=0.5mm Cu ratio=1.8 Ic= T and 4.2 K Beam envelop Coolant path SC correctors: Normal Octupole Skew Quadrupole Normal Dipole Skew Dipole SC correctors: Normal Sextupole Normal Quadrupole Normal Dipole Cross section of QC1 RP 1.123 1.013 Designed new SC cable for main quadrupole 7.0 0.93 3.9 2.5 Leakage fields are canceled by the correction windings on the other beam pipe 1.057 KEKB QCS 0.967 S-KEKB H-Current 0.9 S-KEKB NanoBeam

32 ○ Belle Detector 8m(W)×8m(L)×10m(H) Total weight: 1300tons
 650tons (Barrel Yoke)  600tons (End Yoke)   50tons (Others) H. Yamaoka 32 15th KEKB Review

33 Anti solenoid H. Koiso Vertical emittance degradation depends on the anti-solenoid field profile Anti-solenoid Ver.2 HER:53mrad Bz SuperKEKB

34 IR vacuum chamber Positron
K. Kanazawa Positron Vacuum level will be worse due to poor vacuum conductance. IR assembly is a big issue BPM can’t be fixed rigidly on the quadrupole magnet SuperKEKB

35 Physical Aperture Required acceptance for injection
2Jx=5x10-7 (m), 2Jy=2x10-8(m), 4% coupling Dynamic effects are ignored because nominal nx = 0.53 Physical aperture is not enough for the design β-functions COD is not taken into account No margin for error QC1LP QC1RP QC1LE QC1RE QC2LP QC2RP QC2LE QC2RE Physical Aperture (mm) 20 30 60 70 Required Aperture (Horz.)(mm) 11.2 10.0 16.4 17.2 25.6 28.4 47.6 48.4 Vert. 15.8 14.8 18.2 9.4 9.6 15.4 10.6 SuperKEKB

36 COD (Belle) A. Morita COD in Belle detector depends on the solenoid field profile COD(LER 41.5 mrad) COD(HER 41.5 mrad) 100um 200um 4mm 1mm IP IP QC2RP QC1RP QC1LP QC2LP QC2RE QC1RE QC1LE QC2LE SuperKEKB

37 Machine Parameters of SuperKEKB
2010/Feb/08 LER HER Emittance ex 3.2(2.7) 2.4(2.3) nm Coupling ey/ex 0.40 0.35 % Beta Function at IP bx* / by* 32 / 0.27 25 / 0.41 mm Horizontal Beam Size sx* 10.2(10.1) 7.75(7.58) Vertical Beam Size sy* 59 Bunch Length sz 6.0(4.9) 5.0(4.9) Half Crossing Angle f 41.5 mrad Beam Energy E 4 7 GeV Beam Current I 3.60 2.62 A Number of Bunches nb 2503 Energy Loss / turn U0 2.15 2.50 MeV Total Cavity Voltage Vc 8.4 6.7 MV Energy Spread sd 8.14(7.96)x10-4 6.49(6.34) x10-4 Synchrotron Tune ns Momentum Compaction ap 2.74x10-4 1.88x10-4 Beam-Beam Parameter xy 0.0900 0.0875 Luminosity L 8x1035 cm-2s-1 (): zero current parameters

38 SuperKEKB


Download ppt "Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google