1. - 0 /9- TTA Views on Criteria for Successful M2M Consolidation August 17~18, 2011 (Washington DC, ATIS Building) TTA M2MCons02_15 (Agenda 4.1)

2. - 1 /9- 1.Proposals on Criteria for Successful M2M Consolidation During the last Seoul meeting(July 21), each SDO proposed criteria for successful M2M consolidation. There were several common suggested criteria such as 1.1 Global approach 1.2 Verticals engaged 1.3 Technical work scope 1.4 Relationship with external organization 1.5 Open 1.6 Balance In the next pages, TTA’s views on each criteria is shown in detail.

3. - 2 /9- 1.1 “Global Approach” criteria During the last Seoul meeting(July 21), there was no consensus in the name(PP or Initiative). The name of group for M2M consolidation should reflect the spirits of worldwide cooperation among telecom SDOs including Verticals. And also, it is believed that telecom SDOs which is joining in 3GPPs should be the principal members of “M2M NEW GROUP**”. ** Before deciding a formal name, This presentation used the general terminology ‘M2M NEW GROUP” tentatively. For the sake of global approach, It is desirable that telecom SDOs of each region (Europe, USA and Asia) should participate in “M2M NEW GROUP”

4. - 3 /9- In order to concentrate on settling down of at early stage, it would be necessary to focus standardization activities up to two Vertical industries (Vehicle, GRID, Health…….?). If it is decided to let Verticals join to “M2M NEW GROUP” as a member, key issues are as followings – Which categories should “Vertical Representatives” and “Vertical companies” be joined? – When should Verticals be engaged? (Before or after the establishment of “M2M NEW GROUP” ?) 3GPP / 3GPP2 Participation CategoriesM2M NEW GROUP 1.2 “Vertical Engaged” criteria Organizational Partners (OP) Market Representative Partners (MRP) Individual Members (IM) Observers - Recognized SDOs -Working procedure development/update -No voting right in TSG meetings - Entities registered as members of an OP - Contributions in TSG meetings - Voting rights in TSG meetings - Consultation on 3GPPs Activities - Candidate entities to be future IMs - Be granted by OPs Telecom SDOs Observers Vertical Representatives ? Telecom companies Vertical companies ?

5. - 4 /9- 3GPP structure3GPP2 structure“M2M NEW GROUP” This will be discussed in Agenda Item 4.3 Project Coordination Group (PCG) Technical Specifications Organizational Partners (OP) TSG-GERAN GSM EDGE RAN TSG-GERAN GSM EDGE RAN TSG-RAN Radio Access Networks TSG-RAN Radio Access Networks TSG-SA Services & System Aspects TSG-SA Services & System Aspects TSG-CT Core Network & Terminals TSG-CT Core Network & Terminals Steering Committee (SC) Technical Specifications Organizational Partners (OP) TSG-A Access Network Interfaces TSG-A Access Network Interfaces TSG-C Radio Access TSG-C Radio Access TSG-S Services and Systems Aspects TSG-S Services and Systems Aspects TSG-X Core Networks TSG-X Core Networks During the last Seoul meeting(July 21, 2011), Most SDOs proposed that service layer for M2M should be included in work scope. And also CCSA, TTA proposed that M2M terminal should be included in work scope. Organizational Structures (Number of technical plenary and WGs?) 1.3 “Technical Work Scope” criteria

6. - 5 /9- 3GPPs “M2M New Group” 1.4 “ Relationship with External Organization” criteria Though specifications developed together by each SDOs from Asia, Europe and USA regions can be recognized as global de facto standards, making relationship with inter-national SDOs is needed in order to be recognized as international de jure standards. Furthermore, it is also important to make a relationship with other SDOs which have been working on development of M2M specifications such as OMA and 3GPPs. Organizational Partners (OP) Project Coordination Group (PCG) Technical Specification Groups (TSG) Market Representative Partners (MRP) Adopted by each OP Steering Committee (SC) 3GPP3GPP2 Partners International Recommendations Individual Members (IM) Technical Specifications High Level Committees Technical Plenary International Standards Adopted by each OP Telecom Companies M2M NEW GROUP Telecom SDOs to join in M2M New Group Vertical representatives Vertical companies or etc. Technical Specifications

7. - 6 /9- 3GPP/3GPP2 Decision Making Process “M2M NEW GROUP” PCG 1) /SC 2) -Quorum : 50% of total # of OPs -No proxy permitted 1), Proxy permitted 2) -Endeavour to reach consensus -During voting, > each OP 1) / SC voting member 2) casts vote once > a proposal is approved if 71% of the votes cast are in favor This issue should be discussed in the future. TSG /WG -Endeavour to reach consensus -During voting, > each voting member has one vote > a proposal is approved if 71% of the votes cast are in favour ※ 1) 3GPP only ※ 2) 3GPP2 only 1.5 “Open” criteria Examples – Voting right of Vertical representatives/companies – Allowance of proxy (whether or not to permit proxy?) – The way to be a TSG voting member (how many meetings a participant should attend to get a voting right?)

8. - 7 /9- Leadership Election Process 1.6 “Balance” criteria 3GPP/3GPP2M2M NEW GROUP PCG 1) /SC 2) -Amongst OP representatives -One year1), two year 2) term of office -Leaderships should not be from the same OP, the same region or from the same group of companies, unless other candidate is available It is necessary to setup a procedure which is balanced on regions and SDOs in the future. TSG /WG -Amongst IM representatives -Two year term of office -Allowance of a second consecutive term -Leaderships should not be from the same OP, the same region or from the same group of companies, unless other candidate is available -A specific voting procedure is applied 1) ※ 1) 3GPP only ※ 2) 3GPP2 only Leadership of TSGs/WGs and high level committees should be balanced on regions or SDOs. In this regards, the leadership election procedure currently applied in 3GPPs needs to be improved.

9. - 8 /9- 2. Summary Global approach : For the sake of global approach, It is desirable that telecom SDOs of each region (Europe, USA and Asia) join in “M2M NEW GROUP” Vertical engaged: In order to concentrate on settling down of early stage, it would be necessary to focus standardization activities up to two Vertical industries (Vehicle, GRID, Health…….?). Relationship with EO: Cooperative relationship with external organizations would be necessary for de-jure standardization of “M2M NEW GROUP”’s results. Open: Voting right of Vertical representatives/companies should be discussed Balance : Leadership of high level committees, technical plenary and WGs in “M2M NEW GROUP” should be balanced on regions or SDOs. => It is believed that these items should be achieved while forming a consolidation activity

10. - 9 /9- Thank you for your attention.