Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJunior Horn Modified over 9 years ago
1
Lecture 9: Introduction to Genetic Drift February 14, 2014
2
Announcements uExam to be returned Monday uMid-term course evaluation uClass participation uOffice hours
3
Last Time uOverdominance and Underdominance uOverview of advanced topics in selection uIntroduction to Genetic Drift
4
Today uFirst in-class simulation of population genetics processes: drift uFisher-Wright model of genetic drift
5
What Controls Genetic Diversity Within Populations? 4 major evolutionary forces Diversity Mutation + Drift - Selection +/- Migration +
6
Genetic Drift uRelaxing another assumption: infinite populations uGenetic drift is a consequence of having small populations uDefinition: chance changes in allele frequency that result from the sampling of gametes from generation to generation in a finite population uAssume (for now) Hardy-Weinberg conditions Random mating No selection, mutation, or gene flow
7
Drift Simulation Pick 1 red and 3 other m&m’s so that all 4 have different colors Form two diploid ‘genotypes’ as you wish Flip a coin to make 2 offspring Draw allele from Parent 1: if ‘heads’ get another m&m with the same color as the left ‘allele’, if ‘tails’ get one with the color of the right ‘allele’ Draw allele from Parent 2 in the same way ‘Mate’ offspring and repeat for 3 more generations Report frequency of red ‘allele’ in last generation m m Parent 1 m m Parent 2 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m heads tails m
8
Genetic Drift A sampling problem: some alleles lost by random chance due to sampling "error" during reproduction
9
Simple Model of Genetic Drift uMany independent subpopulations uSubpopulations are of constant size uRandom mating within subpopulations N=16
10
Key Points about Genetic Drift uEffects within subpopulations vs effects in overall population (combining subpopulations) uAverage outcome of drift within subpopulations depends on initial allele frequencies uDrift affects the efficiency of selection uDrift is one of the primary driving forces in evolution
11
Effects of Drift Simulation of 4 subpopulations with 20 individuals, 2 alleles uRandom changes through time uFixation or loss of alleles uLittle change in mean frequency uIncreased variance among subpopulations
12
How Does Drift Affect the Variance of Allele Frequencies Within Subpopulations?
13
Drift Strongest in Small Populations
14
Effects of Drift uBuri (1956) followed change in eye color allele (bw 75 ) uCodominant, neutral u107 populations u16 flies per subpopulation uFollowed for 19 generations http://www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bsci111b/drosophila/flies-eyes-phenotypes.jpg
15
Modeling Drift as a Markov Chain uLike the m & m simulation, but analytical rather than empirical uSimulate large number of populations with two diploid individuals, p=0.5 uSimulate transition to next generation based on binomial sampling probability (see text and lab manual)
16
Modeled versus Observed Drift in Buri’s Flies
17
Effects of Drift Across Subpopulations uFrequency of eye color allele did not change much uVariance among subpopulations increased markedly
18
Fixation or Loss of Alleles uOnce an allele is lost or fixed, the population does not change (what are the assumptions?) uThis is called an “absorbing state” uLong-term consequences for genetic diversity 44
19
Probability of Fixation of an allele within a subpopulation Depends upon Initial Allele Frequency where u(q) is probability of a subpopulation to be fixed for allele A 2 N=20 q 0 =0.5 N=20
20
Effects of Drift on Heterozygosity uCan think of genetic drift as random selection of alleles from a group of FINITE populations uExample: One locus and two alleles in a forest of 20 trees determines color of fruit uProbability of homozygotes in next generation? Prior Inbreeding
21
Drift and Heterozygosity uHeterozygosity declines over time in subpopulations uChange is inversely proportional to population size uExpressing previous equation in terms of heterozygosity: uRemembering: p and q are stable through time across subpopulations, so 2pq is the same on both sides of equation: cancels
22
Diffusion Approximation
23
Time for an Allele to Become Fixed uUsing the Diffusion Approximation to model drift Assume ‘random walk’ of allele frequencies behaves like directional diffusion: heat through a metal rod Yields simple and intuitive equation for predicting time to fixation: uTime to fixation is linear function of population size and inversely associated with allele frequency
24
Time for a New Mutant to Become Fixed uAssume new mutant occurs at frequency of 1/2N uln(1-p) ≈ -p for small p u1-p ≈ 1 for small p uExpected time to fixation for a new mutant is 4 times the population size!
25
Effects of Drift uWithin subpopulations Changes allele frequencies Degrades diversity Reduces variance of allele frequencies (makes frequencies more unequal) Does not cause deviations from HWE uAmong subpopulations (if there are many) Does NOT change allele frequencies Does NOT degrade diversity Increases variance in allele frequencies Causes a deficiency of heterozygotes compared to Hardy- Weinberg expectations (if the existence of subpopulations is ignored = Wahlund Effect)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.