Download presentation
Published byCharlene Diane Holt Modified over 10 years ago
1
Target Motion Analysis for the Localization of Subsurface Targets
Stephen Haptonstahl Northern Illinois University December 3, 1999 I will not dazzle you with an array of deep theorems. The math used to do TMA is mostly calculus and probability. But while we all say math is important, many who teach math have only the faintest understanding of how vital it is even when used by soldiers and sailors that would have a hard time passing a “chance” course. Target Motion Analysis
2
Disclaimer or How Different Cultures Say “I don’t know”
Politician: “We have a Congressional committee investigating that issue.” Programmer: “You can’t do that in Windows. That only works in UNIX.” Consultant: “I can provide that information, but it will cost you more.” Military: “I’d tell you, but it’s classified, so then I’d have to kill you.” Math student: “We never talked about that in class.” Math Professor: “That’s beyond the scope of the course.” This talk is unclassified, but it is quite easy to ask questions that require classified information to answer. Please feel free to stop me and ask questions, but understand that there will be some questions I cannot or may not answer. Target Motion Analysis
3
The Company: Your Country
US Navy 369,220 sailors in uniform (1 officer/6 enlisted) Who joins the Navy? 316 Ships & Subs – almost half underway Operating in every part of the world Other branches Total # of people Allied forces # of other nations Resume <more here> Job description: Receive, process, display, and disseminate tactical information. Target Motion Analysis
4
Target Motion Analysis
Strategy: Prevent enemy submarines from getting close enough to destroy your ship Tactic: Keep the sub “occupied” dodging helicopter-launched torpedoes. Problem: Where do you send your helicopter? The Captain wants an answer in 30 minutes! Why not let the computer handle it? There’s plenty of “furry” data and judgment needed for a computer to give an optimal solution – people are just better at this still. Target Motion Analysis
5
Describing Location in Maritime Warfare
Bearing and Range from ownship - polar coordinates Bearing (BRG): Compass direction (true, not magnetic) from ownship to target in degrees (“mills” used in gunnery – 6400 mills = 360º) Range (RNG): Distance to target in yards or nautical miles Relative reference frame – must correct for ownship motion to get true (WRT Earth) motion Latitude (N-S) and Longitude (E-W) Geo-fixed reference frame Nautical Mile (NM) Defined to be 1/60 degree latitude (equator to pole:=5400 NM) Equal to about 6000 feet, 2000 yards, or 1.1 statute mile Question: A ship traveling at X knots (NM/hr) goes how many yards in 3 minutes? Target Motion Analysis
6
Primary Sources of Information
Active sonar Bearing, range, perhaps depth of target – course and speed Very limited range Counterdetection (perhaps 10X sonar range) Amorous marine life Passive sonar Greater range No counterdetection issues (other that normal) No range information – no course and speed Must use TMA to get range, course, speed Target Motion Analysis
7
Other Sources of Information
Visual – periscopes leave wakes Lookouts (ours or on other ships) (BRG & est. RNG) Pilots (est. lat & lon) Sonobuoys “Yardstick” – range from buoy “Pointer” – bearing from buoy “Cadillac” - both MAD – Magnetic anomaly detector Very short range, but can’t mistake a whale for a sub EW - Reception of their radar or radio emissions – BRG only Intelligence SOSUS – Sound Surveillance System Various classified sources Target Motion Analysis
8
Target Motion Analysis
TMA Team PC Sharps Composition Evaluator South & North Plotters Time/Bearing Plotter Time/Frequency Plotter R/T talker and Sharps Input Sonar/EW/Intel Priorities set by CO Output Location of targets Course/speed recommendations TF N Geo-fixed plot Manual Surface Radar TB RT S E This team doesn’t have a lot of room to work. They don’t get much sleep, and they must not make mistakes. Surface/ Subsurface Warfare Supervisor TMA Team Layout on an AEGIS cruiser Target Motion Analysis
9
Line of Sound Line of Sound (LOS): A moving reference line joining ownship and the target STA STI SOI SOA STA STI SOI SOA STA STI SOI SOA Lag: target and ownship speed vectors on opposite sides of LOS Lead: target and ownship speed vectors on same side of LOS, STA > SOA Overlead: target and ownship speed vectors on same side of LOS, STA < SOA The naïve method of localization would be to search for the unknown parameters in the same order that active radar does: it determines the range, then from the position information, it calculates the course and speed of the contact. It turns out that course and speed are easier to determine, and having this, we can get the range. Note: All of these diagrams show the contact closing, as both STI and SOI are toward each other. Opening: Range increasing Closing: Range decreasing Target Motion Analysis
10
Line of Sound – Evaluator’s Plot
Purpose: Determine the course and speed of the target 000 180 090 270 STI Lead STA Opening Closing Lag Now if we know from a blade count that he’s only making 10 knots, and we can determine from our various plots that he’s opening and in an overlead geometry, then we’ve got a pretty good idea of his course and speed. Overlead *Expires after ~5 degrees of bearing shift Target Motion Analysis
11
DRT & Geo-fixed Plot Recognizing LOS Geometries
Lag Lead Overlead Max Range Min Range The geo-fixed plot on the Dead-Reckoning Tracer (DRT) Min spd = ownship spd Input: almost everything Speed strips – get course, speed, range This is where all the information is compiled, where the Captain will look for a picture of what’s going on 6 kts Target Motion Analysis
12
Time-Bearing Plot – Range Calculations
CPA at graph inflection point convexity determines whether opening or closing Single-leg Ekelund Doesn’t require ownship maneuver Requires an estimated STA Double-leg Ekelund Uses info before and after ownship maneuver Yields accurate range at a time near the maneuver Often target’s relative motion allows this technique Spiess Useful when target has low bearing rate (<1º/min) (not common) Cross-fix using only one ship Target Motion Analysis
13
Target Motion Analysis
Single-Leg Ekelund R x Target Motion Analysis
14
Doppler Effect – Time-Frequency Plot
Using rt = d, we can determine the perceived change in frequency caused by STI & SOI Sw = Speed of sound in sea water, 1664 yds/sec SI = STI + SOI fr = received frequency f0 = emitted frequency fcorr = f0 affected only by target motion Plot fr, then calculate SOI to get fcorr Changes in fcorr are caused by Changes in STI caused by shifting LOS geometry Target maneuvers (best way to detect target maneuvers) Why can’t we do TF plot with EW? The top equation shows why. Target Motion Analysis
15
Applying the Doppler Formula
Assume ownship fixed, or correct for SOI fcorr increases as STI does Lag Lead Overlead We have yet to see his bow (nose), so STI is increasing Our view or him is shifting more toward his stern (tail), so STI is decreasing Target Motion Analysis
16
Line of Sound Determination
Lines on Geo-fixed plot Fcorr (f0 plus STI) LOS Geometry Get from Geo-fixed plot Don’t cross Decreasing Lead Min speed Cross Lag Min range Increasing Overlead Max range Target Motion Analysis
17
What If We Know the Target’s Speed?
Sources Blade count + ID of class = speed Intelligence “We believe a Kilo is transiting from Murmansk to Cuba over x days, so expect a minimum speed of y knots.” Geo-fixed plot (speed strips; lead geometry) What we get If we have max(fc) (perhaps a natural transition from overlead to lag) then we can get f0 Evaluator can improve LOS diagram to better estimate course Geo-fixed plot can accurately fix strips to get course and range Target Motion Analysis
18
What If We Know the Emitted Frequency (f0)?
Sources Inflection point of fc “Crazy Ivan” (like in Hunt for Red October): Target turns through 360º to check for contacts in his baffles (wake). We get f0 halfway between max(fcorr) and min(fcorr). Also get contact speed. We get Very accurate course Warren (freq) range Target Motion Analysis
19
Water is Thicker than Vacuum Convergence Zones
Sound moves along paths of least resistance Salinity, temperature and pressure all change with depth and affect sound propagation Balance struck is a set of distinct solutions, each a path Target Motion Analysis
20
Target Motion Analysis
The Layer The sharp temperature gradient at the layer causes most sound to be reflected Target Motion Analysis
21
Technology on the Horizon
Expert systems – AI based TMA Can we do it? Is it a good idea? Bottom bounce Multiple instances of the same sound coming in at slightly different times from different angles Ambient noise We see with ambient light, why not apply this idea to sonar? Improved active sonar has reduced counterdetection range Target Motion Analysis
22
Advanced Techniques and Further Questions
Tactics What are good maneuvers to recommend that will: Maximize information on the target Minimize counterdetection Zigzag plans EMCON How do we respond to target maneuvers? What’s the best we can do with these formulas? Can we get more from less? Target Motion Analysis
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.