Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Inventory Models – Chapter 11

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Inventory Models – Chapter 11"— Presentation transcript:

1 Inventory Models – Chapter 11
Lecture 5 MGMT 650 Inventory Models – Chapter 11

2 Announcements HW #3 solutions and grades posted in BB
HW #3 average = (out of 150) Final exam next week Open book, open notes…. Final preparation guide posted in BB Proposed class structure for next week Lecture – 6:00 – 7:50 Class evaluations – 7:50 – 8:00 Break – 8:00 – 8:30 Final – 8:30 – 9:45

3 Inventory Management – In-class Example
Number 2 pencils at the campus book-store are sold at a fairly steady rate of 60 per week. It cost the bookstore $12 to initiate an order to its supplier and holding costs are $0.005 per pencil per year. Determine The optimal number of pencils for the bookstore to purchase to minimize total annual inventory cost, Number of orders per year, The length of each order cycle, Annual holding cost, Annual ordering cost, and Total annual inventory cost. If the order lead time is 4 months, determine the reorder point. Illustrate the inventory profile graphically. What additional cost would the book-store incur if it orders in batches of 1000?

4 Management Scientist Solutions

5 Management Scientist Solutions Chapter 11 Problem #4
EOQ (Time between placing 2 consecutive orders - in days)

6 EOQ with Quantity Discounts
The EOQ with quantity discounts model is applicable where a supplier offers a lower purchase cost when an item is ordered in larger quantities. This model's variable costs are annual holding, Ordering cost, and purchase costs. For the optimal order quantity, the annual holding and ordering costs are not necessarily equal.

7 EOQ with Quantity Discounts
Assumptions Demand occurs at a constant rate of D items/year. Ordering Cost is $Co per order. Holding Cost is $Ch = $CiI per item in inventory per year note holding cost is based on the cost of the item, Ci Purchase Cost (C) $C1 per item if quantity ordered is between 0 and x $C2 if order quantity is between x1 and x2 , etc. Lead time is constant

8 EOQ with Quantity Discounts
Formulae Optimal order quantity: the procedure for determining Q * will be demonstrated Number of orders per year: D/Q * Time between orders (cycle time): Q */D years Total annual cost: (formula of book) (holding + ordering + purchase)

9 Example – EOQ with Quantity Discount
Walgreens carries Fuji 400X instant print film The film normally costs Walgreens $3.20 per roll Walgreens sells each roll for $5.25 Walgreens's average sales are 21 rolls per week Walgreens’s annual inventory holding cost rate is 25% It costs Walgreens $20 to place an order with Fujifilm, USA Fujifilm offers the following discount scheme to Walgreens 7% discount on orders of 400 rolls or more 10% discount for 900 rolls or more, and 15% discount for 2000 rolls or more Determine Walgreen’s optimal order quantity

10 Management Scientist Solutions

11 Economic Production Quantity (EPQ)
The economic production quantity model is a variant of basic EOQ model Production done in batches or lots A replenishment order is not received in one lump sum unlike basic EOQ model Inventory is replenished gradually as the order is produced hence requires the production rate to be greater than the demand rate This model's variable costs are annual holding cost, and annual set-up cost (equivalent to ordering cost). For the optimal lot size, annual holding and set-up costs are equal.

12 EPQ = EOQ with Incremental Inventory Replenishment

13 EPQ Model Assumptions Demand occurs at a constant rate of D items per year. Production rate is P items per year (and P > D ). Set-up cost: $Co per run. Holding cost: $Ch per item in inventory per year. Purchase cost per unit is constant (no quantity discount). Set-up time (lead time) is constant. Planned shortages are not permitted.

14 EPQ Model Formulae Optimal production lot-size (formula 11.16 of book)
Q * = 2DCo /[(1-D/P )Ch] Number of production runs per year: D/Q * Time between set-ups (cycle time): Q */D years Total annual cost (formula of book) [(1/2)(1-D/P )Q *Ch] + [DCo/Q *] (holding + ordering)

15 Example: Non-Slip Tile Co.
Non-Slip Tile Company (NST) has been using production runs of 100,000 tiles, 10 times per year to meet the demand of 1,000,000 tile annually. The set-up cost is $5,000 per run Holding cost is estimated at 10% of the manufacturing cost of $1 per tile. The production capacity of the machine is 500,000 tiles per month. The factor is open 365 days per year. Determine Optimal production lot size Annual holding and setup costs Number of setups per year Loss/profit that NST is incurring annually by using their present production schedule

16 Management Scientist Solutions
Optimal TC = $28,868 Current TC = (100,000) + 5,000,000,000/100,000 = $54,167 LOSS = 54, ,868 = $25,299

17 Lecture 5 Forecasting Chapter 16

18 Forecasting - Topics Quantitative Approaches to Forecasting
The Components of a Time Series Measures of Forecast Accuracy Using Smoothing Methods in Forecasting Using Trend Projection in Forecasting

19 Time Series Forecasts Trend - long-term movement in data
Seasonality - short-term regular variations in data Cycle – wavelike variations of more than one year’s duration Irregular variations - caused by unusual circumstances Random variations - caused by chance

20 Forecast Variations Trend Cycles Irregular variation 90 89 88
Seasonal variations

21 Smoothing Methods In cases in which the time series is fairly stable and has no significant trend, seasonal, or cyclical effects, one can use smoothing methods to average out the irregular components of the time series. Four common smoothing methods are: Moving averages Weighted moving averages Exponential smoothing

22 Example of Moving Average
Sales of gasoline for the past 12 weeks at your local Chevron (in ‘000 gallons). If the dealer uses a 3-period moving average to forecast sales, what is the forecast for Week 13? Past Sales Week Sales Week Sales

23 Management Scientist Solutions
MA(3) for period 4 = ( )/3 = 19 Forecast error for period 3 = Actual – Forecast = 23 – 19 = 4

24 MA(5) versus MA(3)

25 Exponential Smoothing
Premise - The most recent observations might have the highest predictive value. Therefore, we should give more weight to the more recent time periods when forecasting. Ft+1 = Ft + (At - Ft)

26 Suitable for time series data that exhibit a long term linear trend
Linear Trend Equation Suitable for time series data that exhibit a long term linear trend Ft Ft = a + bt a Ft = Forecast for period t t = Specified number of time periods a = Value of Ft at t = 0 b = Slope of the line t

27 Sale increases every time period @ 1.1 units
Linear Trend Example Linear trend equation F11 = (11) = 32.5 Sale increases every time 1.1 units

28 Actual/Forecasted sales
Actual vs Forecast Linear Trend Example 35 30 25 Actual/Forecasted sales 20 Actual 15 Forecast 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Week F(t) = t

29 Measure of Forecast Accuracy
MSE = Mean Squared Error

30 Forecasting with Trends and Seasonal Components – An Example
Business at Terry's Tie Shop can be viewed as falling into three distinct seasons: (1) Christmas (November-December); (2) Father's Day (late May - mid-June); and (3) all other times. Average weekly sales ($) during each of the three seasons during the past four years are known and given below. Determine a forecast for the average weekly sales in year 5 for each of the three seasons. Year Season

31 Management Scientist Solutions

32 Interpretation of Seasonal Indices
Seasonal index for season 2 (Father’s Day) = 1.236 Means that the sale value of ties during season 2 is 23.6% higher than the average sale value over the year Seasonal index for season 3 (all other times) = 0.586 Means that the sale value of ties during season 3 is 41.4% lower than the average sale value over the year

33 Lecture 5 Decision Analysis Chapter 14

34 Decision Environments
Certainty - Environment in which relevant parameters have known values Risk - Environment in which certain future events have probabilistic outcomes Uncertainty - Environment in which it is impossible to assess the likelihood of various future events

35 Decision Making under Uncertainty
Maximin - Choose the alternative with the best of the worst possible payoffs Maximax - Choose the alternative with the best possible payoff

36 Payoff Table: An Example
Possible Future Demand Low Moderate High Small facility $10 Medium facility 7 12 Large facility - 4 2 16 Values represent payoffs (profits)

37 Maximax Solution Note: choose the “minimize the payoff” option if the numbers in the previous slide represent costs

38 Maximin Solution

39 Minimax Regret Solution

40 Decision Making Under Risk - Decision Trees
State of nature 1 B Payoff 1 State of nature 2 Payoff 2 Payoff 3 2 Choose A’1 Choose A’2 Payoff 6 Payoff 4 Payoff 5 Choose A’3 Choose A’4 Choose A’ 1 Decision Point Chance Event

41 Decision Making with Probabilities
Expected Value Approach Useful if probabilistic information regarding the states of nature is available Expected return for each decision is calculated by summing the products of the payoff under each state of nature and the probability of the respective state of nature occurring Decision yielding the best expected return is chosen.

42 Example: Burger Prince
Burger Prince Restaurant is considering opening a new restaurant on Main Street. It has three different models, each with a different seating capacity. Burger Prince estimates that the average number of customers per hour will be 80, 100, or 120 with a probability of 0.4, 0.2, and 0.4 respectively The payoff (profit) table for the three models is as follows. s1 = s2 = s3 = 120 Model A $10, $15, $14,000 Model B $ 8, $18, $12,000 Model C $ 6, $16, $21,000 Choose the alternative that maximizes expected payoff

43 Decision Tree Payoffs 10,000 2 15,000 d1 14,000 8,000 d2 1 3 18,000 d3
.4 10,000 s2 .2 2 15,000 s3 .4 d1 14,000 .4 s1 8,000 d2 1 3 s2 .2 18,000 d3 s3 .4 12,000 s1 .4 6,000 4 s2 .2 16,000 s3 .4 21,000

44 Management Scientist Solutions


Download ppt "Inventory Models – Chapter 11"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google