Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Austin Triangle Transportation Study Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Infrastructure Condition Rating System The Center for Transportation Research The University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Austin Triangle Transportation Study Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Infrastructure Condition Rating System The Center for Transportation Research The University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Austin Triangle Transportation Study Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Infrastructure Condition Rating System The Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin

2 Overview Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Infrastructure Condition Rating System.  Condition rating system  Online information available to public  Benefits of proposed system

3  Triangle Objectives:  Improve the existing infrastructure to encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation to/from the Triangle Study Area.  Promote connectivity, safety, accessibility and intermodal potential.  Our Objectives:  Create a method for rating the condition of the pedestrian and non- motorized infrastructure in Triangle Study Area.  Develop database of pedestrian and non- motorized infrastructure. Triangle UT Campus Triangle Background

4 Condition Rating System  Creating a method for rating the condition of sidewalks, bike paths, transit stops, and crosswalks.  Sidewalk Condition Rating System will be modeled after methods used for rating highway pavements.  Sidewalks can be viewed similarly to pavements.  Miniature concrete slabs  Exhibit similar distresses  Lower complexity rating system needed for sidewalk infrastructure

5 Three Modes of Distress  Fracture: Distress in the form of cracking or breaking.  Disintegration: Distress in the form of stripping, raveling or spalling.  Distortion: Distress in the form of deformation or separation.

6 Sidewalk Condition Rating Process 1.Examine current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.Create criteria for evaluating.  Type and magnitude of distress.  Assign numerical values to each distress level  Pre-defined set of common obstructions (i.e. fire hydrant, mailbox, utility pole, etc.) 3.Visual inspection. 4.Assign condition scores. 5.Use the scores to determine the urgency of maintenance.

7 Proposed Sidewalk Condition Rating Scale SeverityDescriptionNotes 1Low SeveritySidewalk in good condition; no maintenance required 2Medium-Low Severity Low distress; unlikely to hinder mobility of average pedestrian 3Medium Severity Uneven/distressed surface may hinder movement of mobility- impaired pedestrian and may cause injury 4Medium-High Severity Sidewalk impassable to average mobility-impaired pedestrian 5High SeveritySidewalk impassable to average mobility-impaired pedestrian; hinders mobility of average pedestrian 6No SidewalkMissing sidewalk segment/slab 7No SidewalkNo sidewalk constructed

8 Proposed Sidewalk Condition Rating System

9 City of Austin Triangle Project Proposed Condition Rating System Online Access to Condition Rating System:

10 Proposed Condition Rating System Benefits of Condition Rating System:  Information for The City of Austin  Current condition levels  Maintenance and construction needed  Cost estimation  Information for the citizens of Austin  Current condition levels  Safe and continuous routes

11 Thank you


Download ppt "Austin Triangle Transportation Study Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Infrastructure Condition Rating System The Center for Transportation Research The University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google