1. CAMP Med Identity and Access Management: Terms and Concepts Keith Hazelton Sr. IT Architect, University of Wisconsin-Madison Internet2 MACE CAMP Med, Tempe, AZ, February 9, 2005

2. CAMP Med 2 Topics What is Identity Management (IdM)? The IdM Stone Age A better vision for IdM –An aside on the value of affiliation / group / privilege management services Basic IdM functions mapped to NMI/MACE components Demands on IT and how IdM services help

3. CAMP Med 3 What is Identity Management (IdM)? “Identity management is the set of business processes, and a supporting infrastructure, for the creation, maintenance, and use of digital identities.” The Burton Group (a research firm specializing in IT infrastructure for the enterprise) Identity Management in this sense is sometimes called “Identity and Access Management” What problems does Identity Management solve?

4. CAMP Med 4 Identity Management is… “Hi! I’m Lisa.” (Identity) “…and here’s my NetID / password to prove it.” (Authentication) “I want to open the Portal to check my email.” (Authorization : Allowing Lisa to use the services for which she’s authorized) “And I want to change my grade in last semester’s Physics course.” (Authorization  : Preventing her from doing things she’s not supposed to do)

5. CAMP Med 5 Identity Management is also… New hire, Assistant Professor Alice –Department wants to give her an email account before her appointment begins so they can get her off to a running start How does she get into our system and get set up with the accounts and services appropriate to faculty?

6. CAMP Med 6 What questions are common to these scenarios? Are the people using these services who they claim to be? Are they a member of our campus community? Have they been given permission? Is their privacy being protected?

7. CAMP Med 7 As for Lisa Sez who? –What Lisa’s username and password are? –What she should be able to do? –What she should be prevented from doing? –Scaling to the other 40,000 just like her on campus

8. CAMP Med 8 As for Professor Alice What accounts and services should faculty members be given? At what point in the hiring process should these be activated? Methods need to scale to 20,000 faculty and staff

9. CAMP Med 9 The IdM Stone Age List of functions: AuthN: Authenticate principals (people, servers) seeking access to a service or resource Log: Track access to services/resources

10. CAMP Med 10 The IdM Stone Age Every application for itself in performing these functions User list, credentials, if you’re on the list, you’re in (AuthN is authorization (AuthZ) As Hobbes might say: Stone age IdM “nasty, brutish & short on features”

11. CAMP Med 11 Vision of a better way to do IdM IdM as a middleware layer at the service of any number of applications Requires an expanded set of basic functions –Reflect: Track changes to institutional data from changes in Systems of Record (SoR) & other IdM components –Join: Establish & maintain person identity across SoR –…

12. CAMP Med 12 Your Digital Identity and The Join The collection of bits of identity information about you in all the relevant IT systems at your institution For any given person in your community, do you know which entry in each system’s data store carry bits of their identity? If more than one system can “create a person record,” you have identity fragmentation

13. CAMP Med 13 The pivotal concept of IdM: The Join Identity fragmentation cure #1: The Join Use business logic to –Establish which records correspond to the same person –Maintain that identity join in the face of changes to data in collected systems Once cross-system identity is forged, assign a unique person identifier (often a registry ID)

14. CAMP Med 14 Identity Information Access Some direct from the Enterprise Directory via reflection from SoR Other bits need to be made reachable by identifier crosswalks Registry IDSys A IDSys B IDSys C IDSys D ID 3a104e59fsmith3286443freds864164 8c2f916dabecker145209amyb752731

15. CAMP Med 15 Identity Information Reachability In System B, to get info from System D –Lookup Sys D ID in identifier crosswalk –Use whatever means Sys D provides to access info For new apps, leverage join by carrying Registry ID as a foreign key--even if not in crosswalk Registry IDSys A IDSys B IDSys C IDSys D ID 3a104e59fsmith3286443freds864164 8c2f916dabecker145209amyb752731

16. CAMP Med 16 Identity Information Reachability Key to reachability is less about technology, more about shared practice across system owners Registry IDSys A IDSys B IDSys C IDSys D ID 3a104e59fsmith3286443freds864164 8c2f916dabecker145209amyb752731

17. CAMP Med 17 Identity Fragmentation Cure #2 When you can’t integrate, federate Federated Identity Management means –Relying on the Identity Management infrastructure of one or more institutions or units –To authenticate and pass authorization-related information to service providers or resource hosting institutions or enterprises –Via institution-to-provider agreements –Facilitated by common membership in a federation (like InCommon)

18. CAMP Med 18 Vision of a better way to do IdM More in the expanded set of basic functions –Credential: issue digital credentials to people in the community –Mng. Affil.: Manage affiliation and group information –Mng. Priv.: Manage privileges and permissions at system and resource level –Provision: Push IdM info out to systems and services as required –Deliver: Make access control / authorization information available to services and resources at run time –AuthZ: Make the allow deny decision independent of AuthN

19. CAMP Med 19 Policy issues re “credential” function: NetID When to assign, activate (as early as possible) Who gets them? Applicants? Prospects? “Guest” NetIDs (temporary, identity-less) Reassignment (never; except…) Who can handle them? Argument for WebISO.

20. CAMP Med 20 A closer look at managing affiliations, groups and privileges How does this help the harried IT staff?

21. CAMP Med 21 Authorization, the early years IdM value realized only when access to services & information enabled Authorization support is the keystone Crude beginnings: If you can log in, you get it all Call to serve non-traditional audiences breaks this model: –Applicants –Collaborative program students

22. CAMP Med 22 Authorization, the early years First refinement on “Log in, get it all:” Add service flags to the enterprise directory as additional identity information –Lisa: Eligible for email –Fred: Eligible for student health services –Sam: Enrolled in Molecular Biology 432 The horrendous scaling problem

23. CAMP Med 23 Authorization, the early years Bringing in groups to deal with the scaling problem Here groups are being used to carry affiliations or “roles”

24. CAMP Med 24 Thanks to: jbarkley@nist.gov

25. CAMP Med 25

26. CAMP Med 26

27. CAMP Med 27

28. CAMP Med 28 Groups and affiliation management software? Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE) in Internet2 sponsoring the Grouper project –Infrastructure at University of Chicago –User interface at Bristol University in UK –$upport from NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI) http://middleware.internet2.edu/dir/groups

29. CAMP Med 29 Role- and Privilege-based AuthZ Privileges are what you can do Roles are who you are, which can be the used for policy-based privileges Both are viable, complementary for authorization

30. CAMP Med 30 Roles (cf. eduPersonIsMemberOf) Inter-realm, specific privileges vary in different contexts e.g. Instructor can submit grades at one site, readonly at another Eligibilility (can have) instead of authorization (can do) e.g. Faculty/Staff /Students get free email from specific provider

31. CAMP Med 31 Privileges (cf. eduPersonEntitlement) Permissions should be same across service providers Service providers do not need to know rules behind authorization e.g. Building access regardless of why -- has office in building, taking class in building, authorized by building manager

32. CAMP Med 32 Privilege Management Feature Summary By authority of the Deangrantor principal investigatorsrole (group) who have completed trainingprerequisite can approve purchasesfunction in the School of Medicinescope for research projects up to $100,000 limits until January 1, 2006condition

33. CAMP Med 33 Privilege Management software? Project Signet of Internet2 MACE –Development based at Stanford –$upport from NSF Middleware Initiative http://middleware.internet2.edu/signet

34. CAMP Med 34 Basic IdM functions mapped to the NMI / MACE components Systems of Record Stdnt HR Other Enterprise Directory Registry LDAP

35. CAMP Med 35 A successful enterprise directory attracts data People start to see the value in reflecting data there App. owners start asking to put person-level specifics –Service config –Customization –Personalization What about non-person data? Why do we never see “data warehouse” and “directory” in the same book or white paper?

36. CAMP Med 36 Basic IdM functions mapped to the NMI / MACE components Systems of Record Enterprise Directory GrouperSignet WebISO Shibboleth Apps / Resources

37. CAMP Med 37 Provisioning Systems of Record Enterprise Directory GrouperSignet WebISO Shibboleth Apps / Resources

38. CAMP Med 38 Two modes of app/IdM integration Domesticated applications: –Provide them the full set of IdM functions Applications with attitude (comes in the box) –Meet them more than halfway by provisioning

39. CAMP Med 39 Provisioning Getting identity information where it needs to be For “Apps with Attitude,” this often means exporting reformatted information to them in a form they understand Using either App-provided APIs or tricks to write to their internal store Change happens, so this is an ongoing process

40. CAMP Med 40 Provisioning Service Pluses Provisioning decisions governed by runtime configuration, not buried in code somewhere Single engine for all consumers has obvious economy Config is basis for healing consumers with broken reflection Config could be basis of change management: compare as is provisioning rule to a what if rule

41. CAMP Med 41 Same IdM functions, different packaging Your IdM infrastructure (existing or planned) may have different boxes & lines But somewhere, somehow this set of IdM functions is getting done Gives us all a way to compare our solutions by looking at various packagings of the IdM functions

42. CAMP Med 42 IdM functions ReflectData of interest JoinIdentity across SoR CredentialNetID, other Manage Affil/GroupsAuthZ info Manage PrivilegesMore AuthZ info ProvisionFor apps w attitude DeliverGet AuthZ info to app AuthenticateCheck identity claim AuthorizeMake allow/deny decision LogTrack usage for audit

43. CAMP Med 43 Alternative packaging of basic IdM functions: Single System of Record as Enterprise Directory Registry LDAP Student -HR Info System

44. CAMP Med 44 Single SoR as Enterprise Directory Who “owns” the system? Do they see themselves as running shared infrastructure? Will any “external” populations ever become “internal?” –What if hospital negotiates a deal? Stress-test alternative packaging by thinking through the list of basic IdM functions

45. CAMP Med 45 Alternative packaging of basic IdM Systems of Record Enterprise Directory Directory Plug-ins Kerberos Apps / Resources LDAP

46. CAMP Med 46 What is IT being asked to do? Automatic creation and deletion of computer accounts Personnel records access for legal compliance One stop for university services (portal) integrated with course management systems

47. CAMP Med 47 What else is IT being asked to do? Student record access for life Submission and/or maintenance of information online Privacy protection

48. CAMP Med 48 More on the To Do list Stay in compliance with a growing list of policy mandates Increase the level of security protections in the face of a steady stream of new threats

49. CAMP Med 49 More on the To Do list Serve new populations (alumni, applicants,…) More requests for new services and new combinations of services Increased interest in eBusiness There is an Identity Management aspect to each and every one of these items

50. CAMP Med 50 How full IdM layer helps Improves scalability: IdM process automation Reduces complexity of IT ecosystem –Complexity as friction (wasted resources) Improved user experience Functional specialization: App developer can concentrate on app-specific functionality

51. CAMP Med 51 Q & A ReflectData of interest JoinIdentity across SoR CredentialNetID, other Manage Affil/GroupsAuthZ info Manage PrivilegesMore AuthZ info ProvisionFor apps w attitude DeliverGet AuthZ info to app AuthenticateCheck identity claim AuthorizeMake allow/deny decision LogTrack usage for audit

52. CAMP Med 52 Appendix: IdM and the rise of policy concerns New systems and applications have come in two primary ways 1.A campus unit approaches a central IT group to build a new application 2.Some Request for Proposal (RFP) process leads to a new system

53. CAMP Med 53 1) A campus unit approaches a Central IT group to build a new application If the IT group encountered policy issues –It had no standard place to turn for answers –Technologists either made policy decisions –Or they referred the issue back to the requestor –Or, sometimes, the project stalled

54. CAMP Med 54 2) RFP process leads to purchase of a new system If the new system affected business process and/or policies –The campus struggled to create a forum to address the issues –Or the effect was not noticed until after go-live –Or implementors did their best to work around the problems –Or, sometimes, the project stalled

55. CAMP Med 55 Responding to requests: A new approach at UW-Madison Campus leaders are defining new ways of channeling and responding to requests Groups like the AuthNZ Coordinating Team (ACT) anticipate policy issues and sort through the concerns They route findings and recommendations to the CIO office The CIO Office take the issue to an appropriate campus body*

56. CAMP Med 56

57. CAMP Med 57 Responding to requests: A new approach The Identity Management Leadership Group (IMLG) will provide leadership on IdM issues when responding to: Submission and/or maintenance of information online Privacy protection Increased compliance demands Increased security threats

58. CAMP Med 58 Why a new group? Technology is now more robust and services are considered foundational to the institution Broader scope, e.g., new populations New policy issues and more of them Need for flexibility and quick turn-around time

59. CAMP Med 59 One key resource to help you start building the IdM infrastructure Enterprise Directory Implementation Roadmap http://www.nmi-edit.org/roadmap/ directories.html Parallel project planning paths: –Technology/Architecture –Policy/Management