Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement"— Presentation transcript:

1 Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement
E-540, p. 1 Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement Rob van der Meer HeidelbergCement member of WBCSD / CSI

2 Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement
E-540, p. 2 Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement Potentials in cement industry Indocement CDM-project of HeidelbergCement Experiences Conclusions and recommendations

3 Cement sales > 65 Million Tons/Year 42.000 People
E-540, p. 3 HeidelbergCement Turnover 6,9 Billion € (2004) Producer of Cement Concrete Building materials Cement sales > 65 Million Tons/Year People Active in 52 Countries Europe Northern America Africa / Asia / Turkey

4 Potentials in cement industry
E-540, p. 4 Potentials in cement industry CO2 emissions at cement production specific CO2 emissions Process CO2 Combustion CO2 ca. 0,8 kg CO2 / t Portlandcement ca. 2/3 ca. 1/3 Raw material (CaCO3) Kiln Cement mill Cement Fuels Additives : o Blast furnace slag o Limestone o Puzzolanic materials

5 Potentials in cement industry
E-540, p. 5 Potentials in cement industry Alternative Fuels Rice husk Palm oil kernels Wood Sewage sludge, paper sludge Waste tyres Waste oil, solvents Plastics Sorted municipal waste materials Clinker substitution Blast furnace slag Limestone Puzzolanic materials Fly ash Energy efficiency

6 Total Production Capacity Indocement
E-540, p. 6 Indocement Citeureup Factory CITEUREUP PLANT CIREBON PLANT TARJUN PLANT Total Production Capacity Indocement > 15 Million Tons/Year

7 Indocement CDM project together with the Prototype Carbon Fund
Clinker substitution Production of cement with less CO2 emissions by using alternative materials like limestone, fly ash and puzzolanic (Trass) materials in cement. Alternative fuels Recovery of waste tyres, rice husk, palm oil kernels, waste wood materials and later sorted municipal waste materials (plastics, paper, etc.) as alternatives for fossil fuels.

8 Expected reduction and tradable CER
E-540, p. 8 Expected reduction and tradable CER Increase the blend in cement production Crediting period : 10 years Clinker content reduction from 90% to about 83% Substitute fossil fuel with alternative fuel Crediting period : max 21, 7 years which may be renewed at most two times Substitute 15% fossil fuel Contract Indocement and Prototype Carbon Fund, World bank

9 Indocement CDM project - Status
E-540, p. 9 Indocement CDM project - Status PIN The Project Idea Note (PIN) forwarded December 2002 together with a „Letter of Acceptance“ of the Indonesian Environmental Ministry to the World Bank. Feasibility studies and Environmental Assessment Studies finalized at the end of 2003. PDD The Project Design Document (PDD) is written by Indocement and the World Bank (PCF) together and submitted to UNFCCCC 23rd. January 2004. Methodologies Begin 2005 the Executive Board of the UNFCCC has approved the first methodology for the use of alternative fuels (ACM0003, May 2005) The approval of the (second) methodology for the use of blended cement followed in September (ACM0005, November 2005)

10 Indocement CDM project - Status
E-540, p. 10 Indocement CDM project - Status Validation and approval and registration Validation by Norske Veritas (DOE) in November Written approval by Designated National Authority (DNA) by end 2005 Registration Formal acceptance by CDM Executive Board (EB) Monitoring Monitoring according to monitoring plan (part of the PDD)

11 In 2002 UNFCCC’s guidelines were vague.
E-540, p. 11 Experiences Procedures Indocement initiated the project end of 2002 when the Project Idea Note (PIN) was sent to Worldbank’s Prototypcarbonfund (PCF). In 2002 UNFCCC’s guidelines were vague. Indocement – being inexperienced in the field of CDM required assistance from consultants (to comply with national legislation, meeting requirements from Indonesian DNA etc). and the PCF (Development of two new Methodologies). Resources and Costs Developing costs are too high and definitely a big hurdle. financial resources (Indocement’s costs around US$ for consultants, validations, registrations etc.) HR resources (patience required)

12 Conclusions and recommendations
E-540, p. 12 Conclusions and recommendations Procedures Lengthy and complicated procedures Procedures only understandable for insiders. Not stimulating for industrial projects. UNFCCC has to strive towards faster and more efficient procedures Resources and Costs At the moment, CDM is not attractive for industrial participants. The procedures for CDM have to be simplified to make it attractive. More standardization and guidance is required.

13 Thank you for your attention!
E-540, p. 13 Thank you for your attention!


Download ppt "Current CDM experiences HeidelbergCement"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google