Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlfred Carter Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 How to write and publish a scientific paper in hydrology Getachew Mohammed Jef Dams Jiri Nossent
2
Pag. 2 Outline Introduction Writing Publishing Conclusions
3
Pag. 3 Why we publish? Personal Main metric for your work/succes Academic duty Promotion and Tenure/PhD Getting a job Department/Faculty/University Funding Getting a “top” statuts World Helping hydrological sciences to the next level
4
Pag. 4 Papers Types of papers Review papers Regular submissions Data notes Invited Commentary Comment/Reply Technical Note Letters Paper Writing Timeline Initiation of Research Data Acquisition First Draft Picky Details -revision, revision, revision Startup Time Progress Submittal
5
Pag. 5 Papers – the facts Most papers are never cited! A good paper in hydrology is cited 25 times A great paper is cited 50 times A benchmark paper is cited 100+ times Why are papers not cited? Not well written Weak science Message not clear (poorly designed study, etc.) Conclusions not supported by evidence On explosion of published papers and minimal publishable units In this electronic age, title now more important! Check out the most-downloaded papers at HP and JoH
6
6 How to write a paper?
7
Pag. 7 Always, 3 things What’s the status quo? What’s wrong with the status quo? How does your work go beyond the status quo? Remember this structure for every paper you write!
8
Pag. 8 A scientific paper tells a story! You need a problem or something to catch the reader’s attention You need a plot You need resolution of the problem at the end of the story
9
Pag. 9 A topdown approach Start with a story board approach Develop an outline with headings and subheadings Iterate on this many times, adding sub-sub-headings Identify key figures to tell the story Fill in the outline further Make writing assignments to co-authors A divide and conquer approach Do not start any writing until the outline is rock-solid, figures are made Subheadings = paragraph topics
10
Pag. 10 The structure Title: Very important! Abstract: What did I do in a nutshell? Introduction: What is the problem? Materials & Methods: How did I solve the problem? Results: What did I find out? Discussion: What does it mean? Acknowledgements (optional): Who helped me out? Conclusions: Whose work did I refer to?
11
Pag. 11 The introduction (Most difficult) Needs a “snappy” lead sentence to catch the reader’s attention. e.g. Runoff processes on tile drained fields are poorly known. Need to state up front what is the status quo, then what’s wrong with the status quo and then how your questions posed are the obvious way forward to go beyond the status quo Another way is to think of defining what we know, what we think we know, what we need to know.
12
Pag. 12 The introduction Very important to tie to the literature Use past studies as set-up for your work Objectives must flow from the set-up Reader must believe that these are THE obvious questions to ask for this point in time for the sub- discipline Objectives vs research questions vs null hypothesis
13
Pag. 13 Introduction …as an inverted pyramid Status Quo What’s wrong with the status quo Why this is a problem How you intend to fix it Specific Objectives # of references increases Very general References Very specific references
14
Pag. 14 Knowing the literature Critical for framing your study in the first place! Valuable for Introduction and building to your objectives Essential for validating your questions That no one else has already done this! That these are the obvious “next step” questions to be addressed Important for Discussion—to define the relevance of your study vis-à-vis other work How did you add incrementally to new knowledge
15
Pag. 15 Very important (for introduction) Clear objectives With all things mapping to and from them)
16
Pag. 16 Discussion (Second-most difficult!) separated from results Presents the “WHY” and “HOW” of the story Includes how work agrees (or disagrees) with work of others. Easiest if structured around questions (as sub- headings) Good examples Anderson et al. (1997) WRR
17
Pag. 17 A bit on writing style Write in the active tense instead of passive tense: “We collected samples of blah...” instead of “Samples of blah were collected...” Avoid all jargon if at all possible. Never assume the reader knows any jargon. Write in simple sentences Subject and verb up-front in all sentences You can use personal pronouns: “We sampled…”
18
Pag. 18 The psychology of paper writing It’s as much psychological as mechanical The most prolific writers do it every morning (early) Small bursts of focused effort Don’t be a “busy fool” Following a session at the gym Jot down notes when out and about
19
Pag. 19 Attributes of the best papers Resolve a controversy Separate Results and Discussion sections Discussion with sub-headings as questions Introduction builds to central questions All roads lead to central question Hypotheses/research questions crystal clear and results flow from these questions
20
Pag. 20 21 suggestions See document
21
21 How to publish a paper?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.