Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMeredith Lindsey Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Uncertainty/Forseeability F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu
2
To be covered 1.Uncertainty 2.Foreseeability 3.Emotional Distress 4.Mitigation 5.Liquidated and Punitive Damages 2
3
Uncertainty: Freund at 95 Royalties too uncertain to provide a basis for expectation damages 3
4
Uncertainty Is Drews at 952 any different? 4
5
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them 5
6
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them Suppose the business is an existing one. Can we assume that the future will resemble the past? 6
7
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them Is there a “new business rule” of non- recovery? 7
8
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them Is there a “new business rule” of non- recovery? An evidentiary rule, not an absolute bar 8
9
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them Is there a “new business rule” of non- recovery? What was the evidence here? 9
10
Uncertainty Drews How to calculate lost profits? Gross profits less cost of obtaining them Is there a “new business rule” of non- recovery? How would you satisfy the “establish with reasonable certainty” standard for a resto? Would a marketing forecast help? 10
11
Uncertainty Smith v. Penbridge 955 11 It’s an acquired taste…
12
Uncertainty Gilroy v. ABC 956 How is this different from Freund? 12
13
Uncertainty Gilroy v. ABC 956 13
14
Uncertainty Redgrave v. BSO 956 14
15
Uncertainty Redgrave v. BSO What was the basis for the claim? 15
16
Uncertainty Redgrave v. BSO At a Los Angeles movie theater, in 1978, there was a bombing and protests. The furor was sparked by a documentary called "The Palestinian," a film produced and bankrolled by Vanessa Redgrave. "Many people were outraged. You remember what your reaction was?" Wallace asks. "I didn't know why people were outraged to see a film about the Palestinians," she replies. Perhaps it was a scene where she danced, wielding a Kalashnikov rifle. 60 Minutes 16
17
Foreseeability 17
18
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale at 113 18 The Hadley Mill, Gloucester UK
19
Hadley v. Baxendale Gloucester to Greenwich 19 2.5 hrs, according to Mapquest
20
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 20 Tel: 011-44-203-188-2100
21
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 21 Just what was the Δ told? Cf Victoria Laundry at 115
22
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 22 Just what was the Δs told? What if the headnote had been correct?
23
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 23 Just what was the Δs told? What if the headnote had been correct? Why might this be a rule of efficiency?
24
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 24 Why might this NOT be a rule of efficiency?
25
Foreseeability Hadley v. Baxendale 25 Why might this NOT be a rule of efficiency? How would you expect carriers to react?
26
Foreseeability Spang Industries at 957 26 Battenkill Brudge
27
Foreseeability Spang Industries at 957 Fort Pitt breached by delivering late, with the result that Torrington incurred extra damages in pouring cement in cold weather Torrington could recover if this was on the cards 27
28
Foreseeability Spang Industries at 957 Could Torrington recover for these expenses? 28
29
Foreseeability Spang Industries at 957 Could Torrington recover for these expenses? Yes, since the alternative of waiting another 8 months would have increased the damages even more 29
30
Foreseeability: Increased labor costs Cricket Alley 962 30
31
Foreseeability: Increased labor costs Cricket Alley What was the promise? 31
32
Foreseeability: Increased labor costs Cricket Alley What was the promise? And what expenses did Cricket Alley incur as a consequence of the breach? 32
33
Foreseeability: Increased labor costs Cricket Alley If increased labor costs are foreseeable, why not lost profits? Same diff… Cook v. Woornick 965 More liberal than Drews? 33
34
Foreseeability: Lost Profits 34 Where the damages are astronomical, are you sure who the least cost risk avoider is? Qu. Western Industries at 966
35
Foreseeability: Lost Profits 35 Where the damages are astronomical, are you sure who the least cost risk avoider is? Qu. Milgard Tempering at 117
36
Emotional Distress Valentine at 967 Is it foreseeable that one might suffer emotional distress on being fired? 36
37
Emotional Distress Valentine at 967 Is it foreseeable that one might suffer emotional distress on being fired? So why no recovery? Can you think of a justification for Restatement § 353 37
38
Emotional Distress Is Allen v. Jones consistent with Valentine? 38 Jules et Jim
39
Mitigation: Luten Bridge at 968 Building bridges to nowhere 39
40
Mitigation: Luten Bridge at 968 Building bridges to nowhere 40
41
Mitigation Shirley MacLaine 41
42
Mitigation: Shirley MacLaine Which film was the biggest turkey? 42
43
Mitigation: Shirley MacLaine Which film was the biggest turkey? What if she had been offered a role as a nun in a western? 43
44
Mitigation What if the injured party is a business that gets new clients after the breach? Kersage Computer at 978 44
45
Mitigation What if the injured party is a business that gets new clients after the breach? Kersage Computer at 978 The analogy to lost volume sellers 45
46
46 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Uncertainty/Forseeability F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu
47
What do they have in common? 1.Uncertainty 2.Foreseeability 3.Emotional Distress 4.Liquidated and Punitive Damages 47
48
A common valuation problem 1.Uncertainty: By the court ex post 48
49
A common valuation problem 1.Uncertainty: By the court ex post 2.Foreseeability: By the parties ex ante 49
50
A common valuation problem 1.Uncertainty: By the court ex post 2.Foreseeability 3.Emotional Distress 1.Both ex post and ex ante 50
51
A common valuation problem 1.Uncertainty: By the court ex post 2.Foreseeability 3.Emotional Distress 1.Both ex post and ex ante 2.Endogenous preferences 51
52
A common valuation problem 1.Endogenous preferences 52 Ron Hunt in 1974: Notice anything unusual about his batting stance?
53
A common valuation problem 1.Uncertainty: By the court ex post 2.Foreseeability 3.Emotional Distress 4.Liquidated and Punitive Damages 1.If we knew what the damages would be, we wouldn’t worry about a liquidated damages clause 53
54
Liquidated damages: When permitted Restatement § 356 54
55
Liquidated Damages How to distinguish an effective liquidated damages clause from a penalty? 55
56
Lake River v. Carborundum Lake River to bag Carborundum’s Ferro Carbo and serve as distribution center Why did LR insist on a liquidated damages clause? 56
57
Lake River v. Carborundum And why was this a penalty? 57
58
Lake River v. Carborundum And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties? 58
59
Lake River v. Carborundum And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties? The efficient breach argument? 59
60
Lake River v. Carborundum And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties? A suitable case for paternalism? 60
61
Lake River v. Carborundum And why was this a penalty? So what’s wrong with penalties? Signalling? 61
62
C and H Sugar at 988 62 MV Moku Pahu
63
C and H Sugar Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981 Sun completed the barge on March 16, 1982 Halter supplies the catamaran tug boat on July 15, 1982 Sun assembles tug to barge in July ‘82 63
64
C and H Sugar Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981, or $4.4M Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered? 64
65
C and H Sugar Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981 Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered? How does Restatement § 356 assist? Cf Comment B 65
66
C and H Sugar Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981 Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered? How does Restatement § 356 assist? Qu. Illustration 4 66
67
C and H Sugar Sun to pay damages of $17K/day after delivery date of June 30, 1981 Was this in excess of the damages actually suffered? How does Restatement § 356 assist? Contrast Massman at 994 67
68
So what’s changed from last summer? 68
69
Recognize this? 69
70
Commentaries 1765 70 Pure and proper slavery does not, nay cannot, subsist in England; such I mean, whereby an absolute and unlimited power is given to the master over the life and fortune of the slave. And indeed it is repugnant to reason, and the principles of natural law, that such a state should subsist anywhere.
71
Commentaries 1765 71 Upon these principles the law of England abhors, and will not endure the existence of, slavery within this nation: so that when an attempt was made to introduce it, by statute 1 Edw. VI. c. 3. which ordained, that all idle vagabonds should be made slaves, and fed upon bread, water, or small drink, and refuse meat; should wear a ring of iron round their necks, arms, or legs; and should be compelled by beating, chaining, or otherwise, to perform the work assigned them, were it never so vile; the spirit of the nation could not brook this condition, even in the most abandoned rogues; and therefore this statute was repealed in two years afterwards. And now it is laid down d, that a slave or negro, the instant he lands in England, becomes a freeman; that is, the law will protect him in the enjoyment of his person, his liberty, and his property.
72
Seven years later… 72 Granville Sharp
73
Seven years later… 73
74
It comes to court: R v Knowles, ex parte Somersett, 20 State Tr. 1 (1772). 74 Wm Murray, Earl Of Mansfield
75
Mansfield’s judgement 75 The state of slavery is of such a nature, that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law, which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasion, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory. It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law. Whatever inconveniences, therefore, may follow from the decision, I cannot say this case is allowed or approved by the law of England; and therefore the black must be discharged.
76
Good luck! 76
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.