1. www.infrastructureontario.ca 1 New Oakville HospitalNew Oakville Hospital

2. www.infrastructureontario.ca 2 Project Name:New Oakville Hospital Scope:  Project Includes:  New facility: Will accommodate diagnostic and treatment facilities, ambulatory care facilities, rehabilitation and complex continuing care facilities as well as a variety of support departments.  Location: Will be located on a 50 acre new hospital greenfield development at Dundas Street and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario.  Total Beds: 457 bed facility that will evolve over time to accommodate 704 beds.  Parking: There will be surface parking as well as a covered parking structure to accommodate visitor, staff, physician, volunteer, student and supplier/consultant parking. Building Type: Main Building: 8-10 storey tower, and several 2-4 storey wings, Roof Top Mechanical Penthouse one level below grade. Parking Structure: 2 to 4 story, on grade concrete structure. Project Type: Greenfield Sq. Ft.Total Building approximately 1,629,695 Building Gross Floor Area. Project Overview

3. www.infrastructureontario.ca 3 RFP Transaction Timeline RFP Issued May 31, 2010 RFP Closed February 25, 2011 Credit Spread Lock In received on April 15, 2011. Evaluation of RFP Submissions March 8 to April 29, 2011 Preferred Proponent Notification June 2, 2011 Commercial Close July 26, 2011 Financial Close July 29, 2011 Approval Obtained: IO Board approval May 19, 2011 HHS Board approval June 10, 2011 MOHLTC Funding Approval Letter issued July 15, 2011

4. www.infrastructureontario.ca 4 Proposals were submitted in response to the RFP by three pre-qualified proponents. Proposals were received from: ConsortiumDevelopmentDesignConstructionFM OperationsFinancial Advisor Hospital Infrastructure Partners Carillion Canada EllisDon Corp. Fengate Capital Parkin Architects in Joint Venture with Adamson Ass. Architects EllisDon Corp. Carillion Canada Honeywell Ltd.Fengate Capital Management Ltd. Community Health Consortium Lend Lease Canada Acciona Aecon Kasian Architecture Aecon Buidlings Acciona Lend Lease Canada Dalkia CanadaInvestec North America Ltd. Plenary HealthPlenary Group, Innisfree B+H+STH, Joint Venture Architects PCL Construction Canada Johnson Controls RBC Capital Markets Proponents

5. www.infrastructureontario.ca 5 Evaluation Reporting Structure Project Sponsors IO Project Manager Fairness Monitor Conflict Review Team Completeness and Legal Evaluation Team Design Evaluation Team Financial Evaluation Team Evaluation Coordinators Evaluation Committee Infrastructure Ontario WCH Project Sponsors Technical Evaluation Team Design Evaluation Team Financial Evaluation Team Infrastructure Ontario Halton Healthcare Services (HHS) Subject Matter Experts Design Compliance Consultant Facilities Management Advisor Legal Advisors Equipment Specialist Financial Advisors Transaction Process Advisor HHS Designated Advisors Insurance Advisor Technical Construction Sub group Technical Operations Sub group OHC Advisors

6. www.infrastructureontario.ca 6 The Evaluation Committee and Evaluation Teams were composed of equal representatives from: -Infrastructure Ontario (IO) -Halton Healthcare Services (HHS) The Evaluation Teams were supported by various technical advisors/subject matter experts: The Evaluation process was monitored by a Fairness Advisor Evaluation Committee Structure

7. www.infrastructureontario.ca 7 Evaluation CategoriesMaximum A. TECHNICAL SUBMISSION500 1.0 Project Management and Construction Plan55 2.0 Works Schedule15 3.0 Equipment Procurement and Coordination Plan20 4.0 Transition and Commissioning Plan25 5.0 Operations Plan150 6.0 Design Submission235 B. FINANCIAL SUBMISSION500 1.0 Net Present Value450 2.0 Quality of Proposed Financing Plan50 SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INNOVATION (Bonus point)30 Maximum Points Available1030 Evaluation Scoring

8. www.infrastructureontario.ca 8 Design Submission Evaluation Criteria  Includes Evaluation of: 6.1 Project Vision and Guiding Principles and Objectives 6.2 Clinical Functionality, including Infection Prevention and Control 6.3 General Functionality, including Accessibility and Safety/Security 6.4 Design Quality, including Environmental of Wellness 6.5 Sustainability, including Flexibility / Adaptability / Expansion 6.6 Technical Building Quality The quality of the design was important to HHS and this was demonstrated by the high weighting the Design Submission had on the overall Technical Score. The high weighting and the categories helped focused the team on delivering a high quality yet affordable solution

9. www.infrastructureontario.ca 9 Proponent Design Submissions

10. www.infrastructureontario.ca 10 Illustrative Design The Illustrative Design: –Represented a compliant design with approved clinical functionality and program layout. The design and layout was endorsed by Clinical and Management User Groups of Halton Healthcare Services (HHS). It was however open to innovation by Proponents.

11. www.infrastructureontario.ca 11 Innovation in DBFM projects Much time is spent discussing risk transfer in generating value for money. Less time, but of at least as much importance is the value of design innovation in generating value for money and real savings. Under a stipulated sum or Build-Finance project, all proponents are bidding to the same design so bid prices are not likely to vary greatly. Under a DBFM, three different designs can generate significantly different construction prices. A Proponent who submits an efficient and optimized design can: -significantly reduce their construction costs since they can efficiently utilize building materials and labour. - With a smaller BGSF there is less building to maintain and repair from a lifecycle perspective. - Also, a lower construction cost means a lower capital cost and consequently lower financing costs.