Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDebra Cain Modified over 9 years ago
1
observational evidences of CR acceleration at shocks chung-ming ko institute of astronomy and department of physics, national central university, taiwan KAW4, KASI, Daejeon, Korea, 2006.05.17
2
shocks, shocks everywhere from interplanetary shocks to stellar wind termination shocks to supernova remnant shocks to merger shocks to …
3
what I want to talk SNR shocks has been discussed by Peter and Aya DSA has been discussed by Hyesung those are the things I know better than what I am going to discuss, so bear with me if I say something trivial or stupid I will concentrate on heliospheric shocks the particles are low energy (low energy energetic particles?), in MeV or even sub-MeV range
4
interplanetary or heliospheric shocks (collisionless) CME driven shocks planetary and cometary bow shocks CIR and MIR termination shock … in situ measurements energy spectrum composition temporal variation magnetic field Waves plasma properties seed …
5
Voyager 1 has crossed the solar termination shock
6
Voyager 1 & 2 (Voyager Interstellar Mission,VIM) launchoutward directiontermination Shockheliopause Voyager 11997.09.05 35.55 o ecliptic latitude 260.78 o ecliptic longitude at 3.50 AU/year cross on 2006.12.16 at 94 AU expect to reach in 2015 Voyager 21997.08.20 47.46 o ecliptic latitude, 310.89 o ecliptic longitude at 3.13 AU/year could cross between 2008 and 2010 reach in 10 years after crossing TS
7
APOD20020624 voyage to the edge of heliosphere counterclockwise from top right Frisch et al. APOD20020624 Fisk (2005) Decker et al. (2005)
8
heliosphere is just one more bubble in the sky but smaller bow shock near young star planetary nebula wind bubble from hot star
9
how do we know Voyager 1 have crossed the termination shock? magnetic field strength and its fluctuations 3 times increase in magnitude right across the shock field in heliosheath is 2.4 times the average upstream field larger fluctuations after shock crossing Burlaga et al. 2005
10
together with abrupt increase in low-energy particle intensity electron plasma oscillations detected upstream and not detectable downstream inferred solar wind speed reduce solar wind speed Fisk 2005; Stone et al. 2005; Decker et al. 2005; Gurnett & Kurth 2005; Burlaga et al. 2005 termination shock (TS) is a reverse quasi-perpendicular pickup ion-dominated shock now it is at 94 AU and is moving inward (> 90 km s -1 ?) compression ratio: between 2.4 and 3.0
11
how about energetic particles? besides SEPs, ACRs, GCRs there are TSPs recently TSPs are energetic termination shock particles (e.g., protons at several MeV) strongly affected by heliospheric disturbances such as MIRs Stone et al. 2005
12
TSPs mysterious streaming outward along B field upstream of TS source located several AU closer to the sun and closer to the pole than Voyager 1 TS distorted by LISM B field or interstellar wind Decker et al. 2005
13
TSPs before and after TS upstream field-align beaming large intensity variation large spectral slope variation (-1 to -2) heliosheath reduced anisotropy less intensity variation less spectral slope variation (-1.26 to -1.56) spectral break varies very little (~ 3.5 MeV) same source for upstream and heliosheath (steady source from TS) reason of break unknown (cf., spectral break in ACR comes from adiabatic deceleration)
14
ACRs anomalous CRs are interstellar neutrals ionized by UV pickup by solar wind at around 1 KeV/nucleon then accelerated by TS to > 10 MeV/nucleon ACRs are substantially modulated in the heliosheath source is somewhere beyond (may still be TS but at a distance from the region where Voyager 1 crossed) Stone et al. 2005
15
ACR spectrum diffusive shock acceleration is alright however, 0.04~20 MeV can also be explained by solar wind ram pressure heating at TS (Gloecker et al. 2005) Decker et al. 2005
16
ACR acceleration not quite what is expected the spectrum does not change and the intensity does not increase cross the shock low energy ions (< 3 MeV per nucleon) are rapidly accelerated, while high energy ions are not affected by shock TS is a shock but not an efficient accelerator new physics is needed? some say yes and some say no, of course! Stone et al. 2005 further into heliosheath immediate upstream immediate downstream
17
TSPs and ACRs both ACRs and TSPs are accelerated pickup ions (e.g., both are deficient in carbon ions) two stagess acceleration: first accelerate TSPs, then accelerate ACRs later (but further fractionation of H is needed in the second stage as H/He ratios are different) Stone et al. 2005
18
interplanetary shocks
19
adapted from Lee 1983 energized particles connection to earth magnetic field
20
typical IP shock most interplanetary shocks are CME driven shocks in situ measurements by ACE, SOHO, WIND, Ulysess, Voyagers, IMP8, ISEE3, Goes, etc. particles are energized, but: seed population? location? self-excited waves? modified-shock? … ACE measurements 2000.06.20~2000.06.26 Desai et al. 2003
21
SEPs (solar energetic particles) Reames 1999 two types: gradual and impulsive different isotopic compositions associated with flares? associated with CMEs?
22
spectrum from solar wind to CR energies seed? high energy tail of solar wind? or pre-accelerated suprathermal ions? Mewaldt et al. 2001
23
seed population solar wind ions or suprathermal ions? observation of IP shocks at 1 AU indicates seeds come from suprathermal ions pre- accelerated by solar flares or other IP shocks 3 He rich events associated with solar flares Desai et al. 2003
24
acceleration sites for SEPs solar flares or CME driven shocks common view (but not all) is CME driven shocks how do we know timing spectrum and intensity of anisotropic ground-level events (GLEs) GLE-associated with CMEs solar gamma ray line flares has little correlation with SEPs …
25
self-excited waves the idea is waves excited upstream of the shock by energetic particles trap the particles for further acceleration the breaks in these spectra may be an indication of proton-excited Alfven waves (e.g., due to saturation) Mewaldt et al. 2005
26
direct measurement Bastille 2000 event (2000.07.15) self-excited Alfven waves by protons weakly super-Alfvenic ions generates ion whistler waves ions are trapped by these waves near shock and thus increasing the efficiency of shock acceleration
27
ACE news #91, 2005.08.30 (Kallenbach & Bamert) Terasawa et al. 2006 2000.07.15 event (Bastile day event)
28
modified shock? at strong shock, when accelerated particles gain enough energy, backreaction will take place SEPs suck up ~10% of CME’s energy (dissipation of CME, modified shock?) Mewaldt et al. 2005
29
Terasawa et al. 2006 shock precursor? 1994.02.21 event2003.10.29 event (Halloween event)
30
complications both 3 He and 4 He intensities are increased at CME magnetic compression region (C) and CME fast forward shock (S) 3 He/ 4 He enhancement with respect to solar wind ion intensities at (C) is larger than at (S) indicates shocks are not the only acceleration mechanism in interplanetary space ACE news #44, 2000.04.25 (Desai et al.)
31
complications 2005.01.20 event pushes the shock model to its extreme parameters regime because of the fast rise time and intensity Ryan et al. 2005
32
factors affecting IP shock acc shock strength, velocity, size and curvature, lifetime, etc. quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular seed populations solar wind suprathermal solar flare suprathermal CMEs may or may not have associated shocks direction of CMEs propagation and connectivity … a lot of things needs to be disentangled
33
complicated business Mason 2001
34
some statistics how does energetic particle relate to shock parameter? no apparent trend from shock angle and speed (except maybe shock speed has to be large enough for large increase in intensity) Cohen et al. 2005 354 shocks
35
shock parameters may not govern the associated energetic particle event maybe the energetic particle event is a history of injections and accelerations (by other shocks or accelerators), while the shock is measured locally about half of the shocks do not affect pre-existing particle intensities, i.e., no shock acceleration (even for a few strong shocks) 162 fast forward IP shocks (CME related) ACE news #44, 2000.04.25 (Lario et al.)
36
it’s good still lots of things to do to be cont’d are you hungry for some?
37
the end
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.