Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Chapter 11 Opener: The mating systems of many species involve defense of food resources
2
11.1 The monogamous honey bee drone dies after mating
3
11.2 Mate assistance monogamy in a seahorse
4
11.3 A monogamous mate-guarding shrimp
5
11.4 Dual mate-enforced monogamy
6
11.5 Female burying beetles combat polygyny
7
11.6 A monogamous pair of cleaner wrasses
8
11.7 An exceptionally paternal rodent
9
11.8 Male care of offspring affects fitness in the California mouse
10
11.9 Durable pair bonds between males and females in prosimian primates
11
11.10 Mate-guarding monogamy in the rock-haunting possum
12
11.11 Paternal male starlings keep their clutches warmer by helping mates incubate their eggs
13
11.12 Paternal care boosts reproductive success in the monogamous spotless starling
14
Box 11.1 Genetic fingerprinting and behavioral ecology
15
11.13 Males of the red phalarope may have to share a mate with other males
16
11.14 Female spotted sandpipers fight over males
17
11.15 Polyandry has fitness costs
18
11.16 Polyandry has fitness benefits
19
11.17 A father’s mating success can be transmitted to his sons
20
11.18 Extra-pair matings can boost the immune responses of offspring in the bluethroat
21
11.19 Polyandry boosts female reproductive success in a pseudoscorpion
22
11.20 Egg fertilizations in female crickets that have mated with a sibling and a nonrelative (Part 1)
23
11.20 Egg fertilizations in female crickets that have mated with a sibling and a nonrelative (Part 2)
24
11.21 Polyandry can yield material benefits
25
11.22 Reproductive output is higher in polyandrous pierid butterfly species
26
11.23 Adjustment of copulation frequency by polyandrous female dunnocks
27
11.24 Female defense polygyny in the greater spear-nosed bat
28
11.25 Female defense polygyny in a marine amphipod
29
11.26 Annual reproductive success of male and female marmots
30
11.27 Resource defense polygyny in an Australian antlered fly
31
11.28 Resource defense polygyny in an African cichlid fish
32
11.29 A test of the female distribution theory of mating systems
33
11.30 Does polygyny reduce female fitness?
34
11.31 Scramble competition polygyny selects for spatial learning ability
35
11.32 An explosive breeding assemblage
36
11.33 A lek-polygynous mammal: the hammer-headed bat
37
11.34 Hotspots or hotshots? (Part 1)
38
11.34 Hotspots or hotshots? (Part 2)
39
11.35 A test of the hotspot hypothesis (Part 1)
40
11.35 A test of the hotspot hypothesis (Part 2)
41
11.36 Female density is not correlated with lek formation in an African antelope
42
11.37 Female Uganda kob do not aggregate disproportionately at leks with many males (Part 1)
43
11.37 Female Uganda kob do not aggregate disproportionately at leks with many males (Part 2)
44
11.38 Lek size and copulation rate in the ruff (Part 1)
45
11.38 Lek size and copulation rate in the ruff (Part 2)
46
11.39 The ratios of females to signaling males of the Mediterranean fruit fly in two “leks” (Part 1)
47
11.39 The ratios of females to signaling males of the Mediterranean fruit fly in two “leks” (Part 2)
Similar presentations
