1. Litigation Best Practices Sailing Through Discovery with Kristen E. Hudson Schopf & Weiss LLP

2. 1.Litigation Hold What are they? When are they sent? Who do they go to? What must be preserved? Emails Network files Personal computer files PDAs Back up tapes – cancel destruction orders! What is the attorney’s obligation?

3. Litigation Hold Consequences for non-compliance Sanctions for attorneys and clients Time and money to defend discovery efforts Loss of privilege Spoilation of evidence claim or adverse jury instruction

4. Litigation Hold Best Practices Issue a WRITTEN litigation hold as soon as litigation is contemplated to the appropriate individuals Be overinclusive for records and employees – include key and minor players, former employees, and employees who changes positions Obtain a copy of the litigation hold that was sent Do not delegate to unsupervised or inexperienced personnel

5. Litigation Hold Best Practices Throughout litigation monitor to ensure that the litigation hold remains in place Keep a contemporaneous record of discovery efforts Do not stop monitoring, even if a discovery stay is issued

6. 2.Insurance Coverage Risks Covered First Party v. Liability CGL Bodily injury/Property damage Advertising and personal injury Employment Practices Liability D&O Entity Coverage v. Coverage for D&Os Obligation to reimburse defense costs Professional Liability Many others

7. Insurance Coverage Duty to Defend What triggers the duty to defend? Claims or suits Notice Potential for coverage Defense of entire suit Use of extrinsic evidence

8. Insurance Coverage Best Practices Always Read the Policy The entire policy Consider rules of construction Give Notice to Insurer Claims made vs. occurrence Late notice and prejudice Keep the Insurer Informed Provide updates Consent to Settle Consider All Possibilities for Coverage Gather all policies Coverage sometimes exists in unexpected places

9. 3. E-discovery Agreements Overbroad discovery requests can lead to terabytes of production What governs the production of e-discovery? FRCP 16 and 26(b)(2)(B) (limits effective 12/10) The 7 th Circuit’s Pilot Program State Court? Nothing See Ill. Sup. Ct. Rules 201(b)(1) and 214

10. E-discovery Agreements Principles of the 7 th Circuit Program Faciliate cooperation between parties early re preservation and exchange of e-discovery Focus on proportionality Principle 2.01 provides a list of topics to discuss with opposing counsel at the outset Identify the ESI, the scope, the format of preservation and production, the procedures for handling inadvertent production of privileged information, etc.

11. E-discovery Agreements Best Practices At the outset, work with your opposing counsel to agree on scope and form of e-discovery, even in state court Educate yourself about your clients’ system, back-ups, and schedules Educate yourself about the opposing party’s system, back-ups, and schedules Designate a technical liaison employed by the client and someone on your team that understands the systems, the formats, and their capabilities

12. 4.Data Collection Best Practices Trust, But Confirm - Do trust that your client has turned over the requested documents, but take time to confirm by speaking directly to key players and custodians Document your conversations in a contemporaneous discovery log NEVER promise that all documents have been produced

13. 5.Discovering E-discovery Best Practices Use discovery to make sure opponent is giving you the right information In interrogatories, ask your opponent to identify the key players In request for documents, Ask for copies of the I/T policies and procedures Ask for the document retention policy Ask for the litigation hold

14. Discovering E-discovery Best Practices Define “document” broadly in your requests Depose a corporate representative on: I/T preservation The company’s policies and procedures How the policies and procedures were implemented in your particular case

15. 6.Requests to Admit Governed by FRCP 36 and Ill. Sup. Ct. Rule 216 Great tool for authenticating documents Can narrow factual disputes early in litigation Must admit, deny, or say why, after investigation, you cannot admit or deny it Limited to 30 in state court effective January 1, 2011

16. Requests to Admit Amended Rule 216 Maximum number is 30, unless a higher number is agreed to by the parties or ordered by the court for good cause shown Each subpart is a separate request Special Requirements. A party must: (1) prepare a separate paper which contains only the requests and the documents required for genuine document requests; (2) serve this paper separate from other papers; and (3) put the following warning in a prominent place on the first page in 12-point or larger boldface type: “WARNING: If you fail to serve the response required by Rule 216 within 28 days after you are served with this paper, all the facts set forth in the requests will be deemed true and all the documents described in the requests will be deemed genuine.”

17. Requests to Admit Committee Comments to Rule 216 Paragraphs (f) and (g) are designed to address certain problems with Rule 216, including the service of hundreds of requests for admission. For the vast majority of cases, the limitation to 30 requests now found in paragraph (f) will eliminate this abusive practice. Other noted problems include the bundling of discovery requests to form a single document into which the requests to admit were intermingled. This practice worked to the disadvantage of certain litigants, particularly pro se litigants, who do not understand that failure to respond within the time allowed results in the requests being deemed admitted. Paragraph (g) provides for requests to be contained in a separate paper containing a boldface warning regarding the effect of the failure to respond within 28 days. Consistent with Vision Point of Sale Inc. v. Haas, 226 Ill. 2d 334 (2007), trial courts are vested with discretion with respect to requests for admission.

18. Requests to Admit Best Practices Carefully craft requests to advance your case Review and send to your client immediately Calendar the due date Start response early Object to poorly crafted requests, but try to answer as best as you can

19. 7.The Privilege Log The Shield and the Sword Privilege log – list of documents and other material withheld from discovery based on claim of privilege or protection What is Privileged? Objection must be timely – failure to object operates as a waiver

20. The Privilege Log Federal & State Comparison Federal Rule 26 Must describe “the nature of…things not produced or disclosed – and do so in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim.” IL Sup. Ct. Rule 201(n) Claim of privilege “shall be made expressly and shall be supported by a description of the nature of the…things not produced or disclosed and the exact privilege which is being claimed.”

21. DATETYPESUBJECTAUTHOR(S)RECIPIENT(S)BASIS 10/18/99Draft documentDraft affidavit of M. McMatter in support of Debtor’s objections prepared by outside counsel for purpose of rendering legal advice in confidence without disclosure to outside parties, and containing counsel’s handwritten markings and exhibiting counsel’s mental processes regarding same. Huff & Puff, LLP* Mary McMatterAttorney Work Product Doctrine Undated (10/99) Attorney’s notesCommunication from outside counsel to M. McMatter for purpose of rendering legal advice in confidence without disclosure to outside parties regarding direct examination of M. McMatter in bankruptcy litigation, and containing counsel’s handwritten markings and exhibiting counsel’s mental processes regarding same. Huff & Puff, LLP * Mary McMatterAttorney Work Product Doctrine Undated (10/99) Attorney’s notesCommunication from outside counsel to M. McMatter for purpose of rendering legal advice in confidence without disclosure to outside parties regarding direct examination of M. McMatter in bankruptcy litigation and exhibiting counsel’s mental processes regarding same. Huff & Puff, LLP * Mary McMatterAttorney Work Product Doctrine SNAPP, KRACKLE & POP PRIVILEGE LOG

22. The Privilege Log Best Practices Take the time to carefully mine your opponent’s log and analyze the information Procedurally sufficient? How detailed is the description? Significant Omissions in dates or details? Over-inclusive – protect non-privileged matters or “bad” facts Challenge over-inclusive logs by motion to compel or in camera inspection

23. The Privilege Log Best Practices Take the time to carefully draft your privilege log following FRCP 26(b)(5)(A)(ii) or Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 201(n) to reduce the likelihood of a challenge Obtain list of attorneys, paralegals, and legal secretaries Know the source of the documents

24. 8.Objections Best Practices Use It or Lose It! Must object to poorly drafted discovery or risk waiver Add a general objection based on attorney-client privilege Especially with subpoenas - serve objections and responses as soon as possible Add a general objection on the attorney-client privilege

25. 9.Clawback Agreements Best Practices Allow for the return of inadvertently produced privileged information without waiver Governed by FRCP 26(b)(5)(B) - provides a party may request the return of inadvertently produced information, and upon request the opposing party “must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim.” The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.

26. Clawback Agreements Best Practices Include a general objection to all discovery re the return of inadvertently produced attorney- client privileged information Danger: just because you have an agreement in Illinois, this may not govern whether a waiver has occurred in another jurisdiction that strictly construes privilege waivers

27. 10.Read the Rules Best Practices Be meticulous in following the rules Read the Court’s Standing Order

28. 11. Pick Your Battles Prioritize your client’s issues Don’t fight if you do not have to Document everything

29. Kristen E. Hudson Partner, Schopf & Weiss LLP – Pro Bono Chair J.D. Magna Cum Laude, John Marshall Law School B.A. With Honors, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Board Member, Chicago Volunteer Legal Services Contact: 312.701.9345 or hudson@sw.com