Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013

2

3 3 2011-13 Budget Revised May 2012 (Dollars in Millions) Source: Senate Ways & Means Cmte, 1/13

4  November forecast: $900 million shortfall *  March forecast: $1.3 billion shortfall * ◦ Revenue: up $40 million ◦ Caseload: up $301 million ◦ Bracken decision: $160 million loss  June forecast:$1.0 billion shortfall * ◦ Revenue/Caseload: up net $320 million *Projections do NOT include $1.0-2.0 billion required McCleary down payment 4

5  Supreme Court rules (January 2012): ◦ The State “has consistently failed” to provide the ample funding required by the Constitution. ◦ “Reliance on levy funding to finance basic education was unconstitutional 30 years ago in Seattle School District, and it is unconstitutional now.”  Supreme Court Orders State to: ◦ “demonstrate steady progress” under ESHB 2261; and ◦ “show real and measurable progress” towards full Article IX, Section 1 compliance by 2018. 5

6 6 ESHB 2261 – Program Changes Required

7 7 SHB 2776 – Funding Changes Required

8 8 SHB 2776 Resource Phase-in School Year2010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-172017-18 1 Full-Day Kindergarten Must be fully funded statewide by 2017-18 Phase-in based on FRPL 219 Schools More funding can begin More funding must begin Continues to ramp up Fully Funded 2 K-3 Class Size Reduction Must be fully funded statewide by 2017-18 Phase-in based on FRPL $0 More funding can begin More funding must begin Continues to ramp up Fully Funded 3 Materials, Supplies, Operation Costs (MSOC) Must be fully funded by 2015-16 $ per student basis More funding can begin More funding must begin Continues to ramp up Funded at new level 4 Basic Transportation Must be fully funded by 2014-15 % of formula funded basis More funding can begin More funding must begin Continues to ramp up Fully Funded Source: OSPI, 5/10

9 2013-15 Budget

10 10 (dollars in millions) All-day Kindergarten89.8 K-3 Class Size (K-1 only)103.6 Transportation131.7 MSOC374.0 LAP143.1 TBIP18.9 Counselors (PIC & Guidance)24.1 Career & College Ready97.0 Accountability15.0 Low-achieving Schools10.3 Local Effort Assistance8.3 Suspend I-732 COLAs(295.5) Assessment Reform(25.0) Hold Harmless(24.7) ALE(12.7) 2013-15 K-12 Budget – Major Highlights

11 Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13 2013-15 Basic Education Enhancements 11

12 Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13 Additional K-12 Education Enhancements 12

13 Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13 K-12 Education “Savings” and Reductions 13

14 McCleary v. State Implementing McCleary

15 15 Education Funding Task Force Adopted McCleary Spending Plan Source: Joint Task Force on Education Funding, Final Report, 12/12

16 16

17 17

18 Initial McCleary Investment 2013-15 Operating Budget Initial McCleary Basic Education Investment 2013-15 Operating Budget

19 McCleary v. State What are the REAL Implementation Costs?

20 20 Source: Network for Excellence in Washington Schools, 11/12 Real and steady progress towards full funding --as testified by the State in McCleary--

21 21 Real and steady progress towards full funding vs. Joint Task Force spending plan Source: Network for Excellence in Washington Schools, 3/13

22 ESSB 5946—Improving Student Outcomes  Adds reduction of disruptive behavior as a condition to serve  OSPI and WSIPP must develop menus of “best practices” ◦ Required to be published by July 1, 2015 ◦ Required to be used by districts by 2016-17  Districts required to prioritize the LAP funds to first serve grades K-4 reading  Readiness to Learn program consolidated with LAP; districts allowed to use LAP funds to continue RTL programs 22

23  Requirement to submit LAP plans is repealed  Beginning SY 2014-15, districts must report annual entrance and exit performance data for LAP students in CEDARs  Beginning Aug 1, 2014, districts must annually report to OSPI: ◦ Academic growth for LAP students; ◦ Number of students who gained at least one year of growth; and ◦ Specific LAP practices and activities in each school  OSPI must compile district data and annually report performance gains  OSPI must monitor effectiveness of LAP practices and offer technical assistance. 23

24 Daniel P. Steele Assistant Executive Director, Government Relations 825 Fifth Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98501 360.489.3642 dsteele@wasa-oly.org ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting


Download ppt "ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google