Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CHALLENGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY: DYNAMICS OF CURRENCY FLUCTATIONS AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICITS PRANAB BANERJI PROFESSOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINSITRATION.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CHALLENGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY: DYNAMICS OF CURRENCY FLUCTATIONS AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICITS PRANAB BANERJI PROFESSOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINSITRATION."— Presentation transcript:

1 CHALLENGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY: DYNAMICS OF CURRENCY FLUCTATIONS AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICITS PRANAB BANERJI PROFESSOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINSITRATION

2 CURRENT UNCERTAINITY Is the current economic situation bleak enough for comparison with 1990-91? Between 2003-08, Indian economy grew at 8-10 percent, prompting prognostications of India’s emergence as an economic super power. From ‘India Unbound’ to ‘The Caged Phoenix’.

3 GROWTH TRENDS World Recession 2008 onwards. India maintains high growth upto 2011. Huge stimulus package ( ` 1.86 trillion). Monetary easing (Mo:21.5percent 2010-11). Growth rates fall from 9.3 percent (2010-11) to about 5 percent (2012-13). Declining trend possible current fiscal

4

5 SECTORAL GROWTH Recent slowdown across sectors Industrial slowdown Even services sector shows decline: an unprecedented development? Decline in Domestic Saving Rate (from approx 37 in 2007-08 to 31 percent in 2011-12).

6

7

8 STIMULUS PHASE Growth rates maintained, but a cost. Fiscal Deficit 2008-09: Actual double of target (3%) 2009-10:6.5 percent. M3 growth 2007-09: about 20%/yr. Export Growth: 29, 13.6 and -3.5 (2007-10). Current A/c Balance: -1.3, -2.3 and -2.8 (2007- 10). Inflation (CPI): 6.2, 9.1 and 12.4 (2007-10).

9 THEREAFTER Fiscal Deficit: 5.7 and 5 (2011-13) (Lower than budget estimate) Central Govt expenditure: 15.8 percent of GDP (2009-10) to 13.1 percent (2012-13). M3 growth rates: 15.6 and 11.2 (2011-13). Mo growth rates: 21.5 (2010-11) to 4.3 (Q3 growth 2012-13). GDP growth rates: 6.2 and 5 percent.

10

11 EMERGING PARADOXES Despite Demand Compression, current account deficit widens. In 2011-12 exports also grow by 21.3 percent, growth slows to 6.2 percent, yet CAD is -4.2 percent. Rises to -4.8 percent and the Trade Balance crosses 10 percent (2011-13). Inflation persists: 8.4 and 10 (2011-13).

12

13

14 POLICY PARADOX In 2012-13, all elements constituting aggregate demand slackened. PFCE growth halved: 8 percent to 4.1 percent. Exports growth: 21.3 (2011-12) to -4.9 (2012-13). Gross Fixed Capital Formation: 4.4 to 1.7 percent growth during the years. Government Final Consumption Expenditure: 8.6 to 3.9 When Aggregate Demand was slackening why was policy not counter-cyclical? Revenue Receipts Stagnant: effect accentuates.

15 MANAGING CAD Stagnancy in capital account inflows After a peak in 2007-08 of $ 106.6b, inflows reduced to $ 7.2 b the next year. Thereafter, it crossed $ 60b since 2010-11. Reserve have fallen from peak $ 305b (2010-11) to $ 296 b (Dec. 2012), $ 275b (Sept. 2013). Sustainable CAD- 2.3% GDP (Rangarajan & Mishra). Assumes Net Capital Inflows $ 50-70b annually over next 5 yrs. Should be reduced to -2 percent ( R & M)

16

17 THANK YOU !

18 Exchange Rate Sharp Rupee (vs $) depreciation: ` 44.2 (July, 2011), ` 55.8 (July, 2012) ` 68 (Aug. 2013). NEER depreciation less. REER depreciation even less, if at all. Volatility has sharply increased. RBI monetary policy occasionally secondary to exchange-rate policy.

19 EXCHANGE RATE POLICY EFFECTIVENESS Indi’s Exchange Rate Policy: Reduced Volatility and checking REER appreciation. Limits to the policy: sharp nominal exchange rate fluctuations, inflation, persistent and increasing CAD. Responsiveness of Exports to Exchange Rate: (-) 0.66 (Aziz & Chenoy 2012, insignificant) (-) 0.2 (L), -0.1 (s) (IMF, 2012). (-) 0.5 (Rangarajan & Patra 2013, insignificant) Responsiveness of Imports to Exchange Rate: 0.47 (Datta, 2004) 0.1 for net POL imports, insignificant for non-POL (RBI, 2012) -contd-

20 “Estimates…show that changes in both overall trade balance as also in the non-oil trade balance are statistically insignificant to REER movements”. (RBI, 2012).

21 REASONS FOR PERSISTENT CAD Forty percent of imports: Energy & Fertilizers Over ten percent: Gold & Silver POL & Fertilizers import bill together almost equal the trade deficit. Price elasticity of imports low. Exchange rate pass through imperfect. According to Moody’s, fuel subsidies ` 1.6 lakh crore (2012-13) or 60 percent of revenue account deficit. Gold as safe inflation-hedge.


Download ppt "CHALLENGES IN INDIAN ECONOMY: DYNAMICS OF CURRENCY FLUCTATIONS AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICITS PRANAB BANERJI PROFESSOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINSITRATION."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google