1. A Multi-Wavelength View of an Active Region Structure around a Filament Channel L. Lundquist, 1 K. Reeves, 1 A. van Ballegooijen, 1 T. Sakao, 2 and the XRT Team 1 Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA The combination of multi-wavelength, high resolution, high cadence data from the Hinode X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and the Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE) give a unique view of solar active region dynamics and topology in different wavelengths. We present results from NOAA active region 10930, observed in December 2006, and active region 10940, observed in February 2007. Co-alignment of XRT and TRACE data yield a striking combination of a filament structure observed in TRACE and hot XRT loops that lie both above and along the filament channel. In the December case, overlying loops exhibit remarkable dynamics while the filament lies dormant, and numerous x- point and triple-leg structures undergo repeated brightenings. We find that TRACE and XRT observations are complementary, and correlation of these data facilitates co-alignment with other instruments. Abstract GHN H-alpha 2007/02/02 08:05 SOLIS LOS magnetic field 2007/02/02 08:05 Case 2: Active region 10940 and filament structure observed Feb 02, 2007 Case 1: Active region 10930, Dec 14, 2006 XRT Thin-Be The combination of multi-wavelength, high resolution, high cadence data from the Hinode X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and the Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE) give a unique view of solar active region dynamics and topology in different wavelengths. We present results from NOAA active region 10930, observed in December 2006, and active region 10940, observed in February 2007. Co-alignment of XRT and TRACE data yield a striking combination of a filament structure observed in TRACE and hot XRT loops that lie both above and along the filament channel. In the December case, overlying loops exhibit remarkable dynamics while the filament lies dormant, and numerous x- point and triple-leg structures undergo repeated brightenings. We find that TRACE and XRT observations are complementary, and correlation of these data facilitates co-alignment with other instruments. Tri-leg reconnection example Co-alignment of XRT and TRACE data reveal complementary structures and illuminate the relationship between the filament channel and the hot X-ray loops. Loops lying both along and above the filament apparently result in the many x-point reconnection events observed at the intersection of these two types of loops. Overlay of XRT and TRACE TRACE 195 2006-Dec-14 10:57 XRT Thin-Be 2006-Dec-14 10:57 Contour overlay Hot x-ray loops with cool “moss” footpoints arc over the filament Flare and H-alpha context The repeated small flares in most cases involves reconnection of the structures lying along the filament and those lying over it. During this small flaring event, brightenings along the filament channel are observed, followed by this apparent reconnection of the filament-overlying and filament-parallel structures. Similar examples are repeated about three times. Some X-ray structures appear to lie along the filament Tri-leg reconnection event Before small flare Non-linear force free field model for 2007 February 2 at 16:37 UT. The model contains a dextral flux rope with an axial flux of 6x10 20 Mx and a poloidal flux of -6x10 -10 Mx/cm. (a) Contours from SOLIS data (red=positive, green=negative), plotted with selected field lines inside the flux rope. (b) Same contours plotted on H-alpha image from Kanzelhohe Observatory, taken at 08:05 UT. (c) Same contours plotted on TRACE 195 image, taken at 1819 UT. (d) Fieldlines added to TRACE data. Magnetic Field Calculation (a)(b) (c)(d) Kanzelhohe H-alphaGOES X-ray flux XRT and TRACE present complementary high- and low-temperature views of the active region corona. AR 10930 shows a fascinating example of hot X-ray loops both along and above a filament channel, which reconnect repeatedly in x-point and tri-leg structures. The location and orientation of the hot loops with respect to the filament is made clear only through comparison with TRACE. Aligning data from the two instruments remains challenging, and in this poster, it is still being done at the level of manual feature comparison. In the case of the December 2006 data, we were able to use the footpoint moss structures and presence of a filament channel to align the data sets by eye. In the case of the February 2007 data set, the primary alignment is still done by hand, but we are aided by the additional information from secondary data sets. MDI or SOLIS data, for example, provide a full-sun image that can be aligned by the limb to full-Sun XRT images. They also provide white light data which can be compared to TRACE white light data. Future work will explore the efficacy of this approach. A similar method will be applied to to Hinode XRT-SOT co-alignment in the absence of G-band observations from XRT. Conclusions and Future Work XRT AL/poly 2-Feb-2007 18:18 Overlay of XRT and TRACE XRT contours overlaid on TRACE 195 data again show “moss” structures at the base of hot loops. TRACE 195 2-Feb-2007 18:19, with XRT contours