Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTodd Youngman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Advanced Scheduling Concepts Software can land an aircraft. Why can’t it plan a project? Shane Archibald, Managing Principal Archibald Associates & Spider Project USA SESSION FRI35
2
Advanced Scheduling Concepts In this session, we will Review some significant advances in software and computing capabilities… and how they came about Review what we think we know about scheduling… and maybe learn otherwise Shift our way of thinking and take a giant step forward Review some interesting and unique functionality in a very special Scheduling tool
3
The Evolution of Computers
5
Computers have never been good at finding answers to complex questions The very best can only comprehend and answer simple, straightforward questions but still get them wrong nearly one third of the time Search engines don’t answer a question–they deliver thousands of search results that match keywords Are we satisfied? If so, then Why?
6
IBM’s R&D Challenge The grand challenge driving IBM’s project was to win on the game show Jeopardy! The broader goal was to create a new generation of technology that could find answers in unstructured data
7
IBM’s Answer Watson
9
A Significant Step in Computing Evolution – IBM’s Watson Fed mountains of information, including text from Commercial sources, such as the World Book Encyclopedia Sources that allow open copying of their content, such as Wikipedia and books from Project Gutenberg
10
A Significant Step in Computing Evolution – IBM’s Watson Programed it to respond based on rank of findings Tested it in a mock game of Jeopardy! Failed miserably!
11
A Significant Step in Computing Evolution – IBM’s Watson
12
Watson They tried Again. And again. And failed each time. Asked themselves how people learn and improve The Paradigm Shift
13
February 2011 – Success!!
14
Watson – Early Lessons Learned Why was the Team successful? Didn’t settle for existing “reality” Stopped doing the same thing, expecting different results Team asked themselves what the difference was between people and Watson Understood a minor change in approach can lead to a significant change in outcome What does all this have to do with Scheduling?
15
IBM’s Watson – Relevant to Scheduling? Traditional CPM Software Uses a single predefined formula; no heuristics Uses heavy human intervention; no automated adjustments or changes Results require significant analysis, validation & manual adjustments; “I’ll take it from there…” Process is cumbersome, inefficient and inaccurate
16
Cumbersome Process?
17
Collect information and estimates (duration, effort, resource, cost, risk, etc.) Enter into scheduling system, calculate, validate; plan and schedule produced! Work Update for progress, recalculate, validate Analyze results and identify issues Meet with team to mitigate issues; make decisions and new plans Enter decisions / changes to schedule, recalculate, validate Repeat …For the life of the project!
18
Cumbersome Process? What if we are talking about aircraft autopilot? Collect information Enter into system Fly (for a second) Update information for flight progress, recalculate forecast, validate Analyze results and identify issues Meet with team to mitigate issues; make decisions and new plans Enter decisions / changes to flight controls, recalculate, validate Repeat …For the life of the flight!
19
What if we are talking about aircraft autopilot?
22
Software Can Land an Aircraft! But it needs the variables, rules, and algorithms to do so
23
The Mechanics
24
The Variables Internal variables Elevator (Pitch) Rudder (Yaw) Aileron (Roll) Flaps (Lift) Ground & Air speed Thrust Gross weight Drag / Friction External variables Wind speed Wind direction Air pressure Weather Altitude Destination (location, altitude, etc.) Other aircraft Other changes
25
The Rules Gross weight –– Air Speed Air speed –– Flaps Pitch –– Thrust Drag –– Thrust Etc…
26
The Algorithm If Air Speed < X and Flaps < Y Then Increase Thrust until Air Speed => X OR Lower Flaps until Flaps => Y Or… Immediately measure again and repeat
27
The Results FAST response times ACCURATE adjustments REDUCED workload
28
Software Can Land an Aircraft! If a computer can land a 450 ton aircraft full of human life with zero intervention, then why can’t it correctly re-sequence a few thousand activities and resources? IT CAN! But it needs the variables, rules, and algorithms to do so
29
The Challenge How do we develop a “Self-Correcting” Schedule?
30
Re-pave Roadway A Sample Exercise: Re-pave Roadway
31
Existing “Reality” Standard Schedule Input for an Activity Duration Logic Resources Cost Baseline *Timeframe (Calendar window)
32
Existing “Reality” What are we trying to represent? Duration – Amount of work (and resource capacity) Logic – Relationship to other work Resources – People, Equipment & Materials used to complete that work Cost – Cost of the work (and overall Spending Plan) Baseline – Target of the work; success criteria *Timeframe (Calendar window) – When the work will take place
33
Existing “Reality” What are the maintenance requirements? Duration – Amount of work (and resource capacity) Logic – Relationship to other work Resources – People, Equipment & Materials used to complete that work Cost – Cost of the work (and overall Spending Plan) Baseline – Target of the work; success criteria *Timeframe (Calendar window) – When the work will take place
34
Existing “Reality”
35
A Sample Exercise Are there opportunities for improvement?? Absolutely!
36
Remember the IBM R&D Team?
37
Shifting The Paradigm Didn’t settle for existing “reality” Stopped doing the same thing, expecting different results Asked themselves what the difference was between human-decision and software-output processes Understood that a minor change in approach could lead to a significant change in outcome
38
Let’s Think About This… What are the Variables? What information do we, as a team and in a meeting, use when determining the best current plan or solution? What are the Rules? How do we, as a team, chose alternatives when tasked with changing our plan? What should the Heuristic algorithm target? The target is determined by the user The algorithm is proprietary
39
A Sample Exercise Internal & External Variables
40
Internal Variables those that are completely self-contained within the subject, are directly related and work together to achieve some result External Variables IMPACT the Internal Variables in some way, shape or form
41
Our Challenge… …Is to develop the Internal Variables and related Rules such that they react to impacts from External Variables without human intervention Assumption: The Schedule “Activity” is the basic building block of a Schedule and will be our focus
42
What are the Internal Variables of our Activity? Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work *Scope of Work* (volume)
43
What are the External Variables? Labor Availability Equipment Availability Availability of Supplies & Materials Space limitations True Predecessors Special Events Weather or Season Site Conditions Target or Baseline Management “preference”
44
How do we Automate Internal Variables… …So they self-correct when something changes?
45
Primary Foundational Building Block Volume is an attribute of each activity, representing the amount of work to be done
46
Let’s Start SLOW, From The Top and Automate our Internal Variables Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work
47
Imagine… What if we could wrap Rules around the activity, like… You should delay the work until the last minute You cannot pause the work; it must be fully completed in a single pass If Site A has standing water, you must remove that water before digging the trench
48
We Will Have Automated… Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work
49
Imagine Complex Logic… What if Logic could be used to represent complex relationships to other work, like… You MUST do the work IMMEDIATELY following completion of predecessor Y You can start the work as soon as predecessor X is 30 yards down the road but you cannot pass 50-yards until predecessor X is 10 yards from completion If Z happens, then we need to do B, C, & D before A
50
We Will Have Automated… Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work
51
Imagine that Resources… …had unique Productivity Values for that type of work
52
Then Hours Required… …would be the result of Volume of work divided by individual Resource Productivity Hours = Volume / Resource Productivity And Duration = Hours / Resource Workday
53
Then Hours & Duration… …Would be Self-Adjusting based on Resources Assigned But we would still need to manually assign them
54
We Will Have Automated… Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work
55
Imagine Resources… …With attributes describing their specialized Skill …That could be automatically assigned to activities based on Skill required
56
We Will Have Automated… Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work Are we there yet?
57
Imagine Resources With… Specific hourly and overhead Rates
58
And… Cost of the work was based on Forecasted hours and true rates of automatically assigned “named” resources Overhead costs were applied by hour or flat rate or quantity of material or use of equipment Materials consumed by Equipment and was automatically applied
59
Then TOTAL Cost… …Would be automatically calculated based on the specific Resource that has been automatically assigned
60
We Will Have Automated… Unique characteristics Timeframe Effort (Hours) Duration Responsibility (Resources) Cost to Complete the Work
61
How Long…? How long do you think it will take companies to develop software that will let us use Variables?
62
Actually… It’s already here!
63
Spider Does! Spider allows Multi-Resources too Connect your Named Resources (e.g. Bricklayer, Bricks, Masonry, and Mixer) to create a multi-resource and make just a single assignment for brick work Maybe you have multiple mixers and bricklayers… Use Skills as part of your Multi-Resource to let Spider pick the best named resource for the assignment
64
Spider Does! Teams of Resources can be: Assigned to activities so the activities will start only when the whole Team is available to work …Or Resources can be described as “able to do the work” and the software would pick the “best” or available team to complete the work, make the assignment, calculate the costs, and consume the materials Teams can consist of may different Resources, Equipment, Materials, Multi-Resources or Skills
65
Spider Does! Resource assignments can carry Rules such as… “You MUST have at least 2 of this type of resource to start the task. You can have more resources but cannot exceed 5 at any given time during performance of the task due to space or other limitations” Spider will start the task when it can find two resources that are ready to perform and will ADD up to three additional resources if and when they become available, to complete the task faster
66
Spider Does! Spider supports TRUE Risk Management Insert REAL Risk Events into your activity network Attach Mitigation Plans to those Risk Events using conditional logic Built-in Monte Carlo will consider these events and mitigation plans when calculating probabilities of success for At Complete dates and costs
67
Spider Does! Baseline values… Can be driven by confidence levels, which can be driven by MC statistical analysis Can easily compare values, in your schedule, ON YOUR SCREEN (and NOT in a 2,394 page text file!) Can be easily updated
68
Spider Does! Spider supports the 3-Senarios Method Build Optimistic, Pessimistic, and Most Likely schedules- Spider will automatically maintain synchronization from a single update Provide the Pessimistic version to the owner or Client Provide the Most Likely version to the Project Manager …But drive the Team towards the Optimistic version
69
Spider Does! Algorithms are based on Heuristics heu·ris·tic 4. Computers, Mathematics. pertaining to a trial-and-error method of problem solving used when an algorithmic approach is impractical. -dictionary.com
70
Spider Does! Schedule Optimization Spider is the ONLY Project Management software that optimizes resource, cost, and material constrained schedules and budgets for projects and portfolios
71
Spider Does! Monte Carlo & Schedule Optimization Spider is the ONLY Project Management software that properly runs Monte Carlo on Optimized Schedules
72
Spider Does! Spider will search through multiple combinations of variables to automatically assign the best Resource(s) to each activity, based on: Type of Resource(s) needed Availability of the Resource(s), when the work takes place (NOT when the project is initially planned) Total Cost to complete the work, based on the cost and productivity of the Resources in the pool Or on speed to complete the work, based purely on the productivity of the resources in the pool …Based on your personal choice
73
Spider Does! With the push of a button you can run a heuristics-based algorithm that will search through various combinations of all those variables to find the optimal schedule to give us: The shortest possible schedule? The lowest possible Cost? The greatest return on investment? The quickest release of key Resources? The most Payment Milestones by the end of the year? What is your priority? What will it be tomorrow?
74
Spider Does! …SO much more Visit SpiderProjectUSA.com
75
Conclusion Paradigm Shifts ARE possible Don’t settle for existing “reality” Stop doing the same thing, expecting different results Ask yourselves what the difference is between human-decision and software- output processes Understand that a minor change in approach can AND DOES lead to a significant change in outcome
76
Conclusion Project Schedules can self-adjust if given variables, rules, and heuristic algorithms instead of static values and simple equations Spider Project employs significantly advanced heuristic- based functions and algorithms to support Dynamic Variable Scheduling
77
Contact Shane Archibald, Managing Principal Archibald Associates & Spider Project USA Shane@ArchibaldAssociates.com Shane@SpiderProjectUSA.com
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.