2. 4 - 1 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Professional Ethics Chapter 4

3. 4 - 2 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 1 Distinguish ethical from unethical behavior in personal and professional contexts.

4. 4 - 3 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder What Are Ethics? Ethics can be defined broadly as a set of moral principles or values. Each of us has such a set of values. We may or may not have considered them explicitly.

5. 4 - 4 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Need for Ethics Ethical behavior is necessary for a society to function in an orderly manner. The need for ethics in society is sufficiently important that many commonly held ethical values are incorporated into laws.

6. 4 - 5 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Illustrative Prescribed Ethical Principles Trustworthiness Responsibility Caring Respect Fairness Citizenship

7. 4 - 6 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Why People Act Unethically The person’s ethical standards are different from those of society as a whole. The person chooses to act selfishly. In many instances, both reasons exist.

8. 4 - 7 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder A Person Chooses to Act Selfishly – Example Person A finds a briefcase containing important papers and $1,000. He tosses the briefcase and keeps the money. He brags to his friends about his good fortune. This action probably differs from most of society.

9. 4 - 8 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder A Person Chooses to Act Selfishly – Example Person B faces the same situation but responds differently. He keeps the money but leaves the briefcase. He tells nobody and spends the money. He has violated his own ethical standards and chose to act selfishly.

10. 4 - 9 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 2 Resolve ethical dilemmas using an ethical framework.

11. 4 - 10 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ethical Dilemmas An ethical dilemma is a situation a person faces in which a decision must be made about appropriate behavior.

12. 4 - 11 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Rationalizing Unethical Behavior Everybody does it. If it’s legal, it’s ethical. Likelihood of discovery and consequences

13. 4 - 12 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Resolving Ethical Dilemmas 1. Obtain the relevant facts. 2. Identify the ethical issues from the facts. 3. Determine who is affected.

14. 4 - 13 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Resolving Ethical Dilemmas 4. Identify the alternatives available to the person who must resolve the dilemma. person who must resolve the dilemma. 5. Identify the likely consequence of each alternative. alternative. 6. Decide the appropriate action.

15. 4 - 14 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Relevant Facts A staff person has been informed that he will work hours without recording them as hours worked. Firm policy prohibits this practice. Another staff person has stated that this is common practice in the firm.

16. 4 - 15 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ethical Issue Is it ethical for the staff person to work hours and not record them as hours worked in this situation? Who is affected? How are they affected? What alternatives does the staff person have?

17. 4 - 16 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 3 Explain the importance of ethical conduct for the accounting profession.

18. 4 - 17 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Special Need for Ethical Conduct in Professions Our society has attached a special meaning to the term professional. A professional is expected to conduct himself or herself at a higher level than most other members of society.

19. 4 - 18 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder CPAs Encouraged to Conduct Themselves at a High Level Conduct of CPA firm personnel CPAexamination GAAS and interpretations Continuing education requirements

20. 4 - 19 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder CPAs Encouraged to Conduct Themselves at a High Level Conduct of CPA firm personnel QualitycontrolPeerreview Legal liability

21. 4 - 20 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder CPAs Encouraged to Conduct Themselves at a High Level Conduct of CPA firm personnel PCAOB and SEC Division of CPA firms Code of Professional Conduct

22. 4 - 21 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 4 Describe the purpose and content of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.

23. 4 - 22 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Code of Professional Conduct Principles Ideal standards of ethical conduct stated in philosophical terms. They are not enforceable. Rules of conduct Minimum standards of ethical conduct stated as specific rules. They are enforceable. Interpretations of the rules of conduct Interpretation of the rules of conduct by the AICPA Division of Professional Ethics. They are not enforceable, but a practitioner must justify departure.

24. 4 - 23 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Code of Professional Conduct Ethicalrulings Published explanations and answers to questions about the rules of conduct submitted to the AICPA by practitioners and others interested in ethical requirements. They are not enforceable, but a practitioner must justify departure.

25. 4 - 24 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ethical Principles 1. Responsibilities: Professionals should exercise sensitive and moral judgments in all their activities. 2. The public interest: Members should accept the obligation to act in a way that will serve and honor the public.

26. 4 - 25 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ethical Principles 3. Integrity: Members should perform all responsibilities with integrity to maintain public confidence. 4. Objectivity and independence: Members should be objective, independent, and free of conflicts of interest.

27. 4 - 26 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ethical Principles 5. Due care: Members should observe the profession’s standards and strive to improve competence. 6. Scope and nature of services: A member in public practice should observe the Code of Professional Conduct.

28. 4 - 27 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Standards of Conduct Principles Rules of conduct Substandardconduct Ideal conduct by practitioners Minimum level of conduct by practitioners

29. 4 - 28 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 5 Understand Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other SEC independence requirements and other factors that influence auditor independence.

30. 4 - 29 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Independence The value of auditing depends heavily on the public’s perception of the independence of auditors. Independence in fact Independence in appearance

31. 4 - 30 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC Provisions Addressing Auditor Independence The SEC adopted rules strengthening auditor independence in January 2003 Consistent with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the revised SEC rules further restrict, but do not completely eliminate the type of nonaudit services that can be provided to the public.

32. 4 - 31 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC Provisions Addressing Auditor Independence 1. Bookkeeping and other accounting services 2. Financial information systems design and implementation 3. Appraisal or valuation services 4. Actuarial services 5. Internal audit outsourcing 6. Management of human resource functions 7. Broker or dealer or investment adviser or investment banker services or investment banker services 8. Legal and expert services unrelated to the audit 9. Any other service that the PCAOB determines by regulation is impermissible by regulation is impermissible Prohibited Services

33. 4 - 32 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Committees An audit committee is a selected number of members of a company’s board of directors whose responsibilities include helping auditors remain independent of management. Most audit committees are made up of three to five or sometimes as many as seven directors who are not a part of company management

34. 4 - 33 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Committees The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that all members of the audit committee be independent. Companies must disclose whether or not the audit committee includes at least one financial expert.

35. 4 - 34 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Conflicts Arising from Employment Relationships The SEC has added a one year “cooling off ” period before a member of the audit engagement team can work for the client in certain key management positions.

36. 4 - 35 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Partner Rotation The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that the lead and concurring audit partner rotate off the audit engagement after a period of five years.

37. 4 - 36 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Ownership Interests SEC rules adopted in 2000 on financial relationships narrow the restrictions on ownership in clients to those persons who can influence the audit.

38. 4 - 37 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Independence Standards Board It was dissolved in July 2001. ISB pronouncements and interpretations remain enforceable unless they conflict with the independence rulings issued by the SEC.

39. 4 - 38 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Other Issues Shopping for accounting principles Engagement and payment of audit fees by management

40. 4 - 39 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 6 Apply the AICPA Code rules and interpretations on independence and explain their importance.

41. 4 - 40 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Rules of Conduct Rule 101 – Independence A member in public practice shall be independent in the performance of professional services as required by standards promulgated by bodies designated by Council.

42. 4 - 41 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Financial Interests Interpretations of Rule 101 prohibit covered members from owning any direct investments in audit clients. Covered members Direct versus indirect financial interest Material or immaterial

43. 4 - 42 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Related Financial Interests Issues  Former practitioners  Normal lending procedures  Financial interests and employment of immediate and close family of immediate and close family  Joint investor or investee relationship with client relationship with client  Director, officer, management, or employee of a company or employee of a company

44. 4 - 43 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Litigation Between CPA Firm and Client A lawsuit or intent to start a lawsuit between a CPA firm and its client is a violation of Rule 101 for the current audit.

45. 4 - 44 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Bookkeeping and Other Services The AICPA Code permits a CPA firm to do both bookkeeping and auditing for the same client.

46. 4 - 45 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Bookkeeping and Other Services 1. Client must accept full responsibility for the financial statements. for the financial statements. 2. The CPA must not assume the role of employee or of management. of employee or of management. 3. The audit must conform to GASS.

47. 4 - 46 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Bookkeeping and Other Services The SEC does not allow audit firms to provide bookkeeping services to public company audit clients. Consulting and other nonaudit services Unpaid fees

48. 4 - 47 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 7 Understand the requirements of other rules under the AICPA Code.

49. 4 - 48 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Other Rules of Conduct 102 – Integrity and objectivity 201 – General standards 202 – Compliance with standards 203 – Accounting principles 301 – Confidential client information

50. 4 - 49 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Other Rules of Conduct 302 – Contingent fees 501 – Acts discreditable 502 – Advertising and other forms of solicitation of solicitation 503 – Commissions and referral fees 505 – Form of organization and name

51. 4 - 50 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Learning Objective 8 Describe the enforcement mechanisms for the rules of conduct.

52. 4 - 51 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Enforcement Action by AICPA Professional Ethics Division Action by a state Board of Accountancy

53. 4 - 52 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder End of Chapter 4