1. 1 PSE 2010 Defining the breadline Is there a Northern Ireland consensus? Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series 26 April 2012

2. 2 PSE 2010 Participants University of Bristol Heriot-Watt University The Open University Queen's University Belfast University of Glasgow University of York www.poverty.ac.uk

3. 3 PSE 2010 Context International financial crisis ‘Austerity’ budgets in Europe Role of the UK state to be pegged back to a level of intervention below that in the United States Welfare Reform Act 2012 Rising costs – fuel and food

4. 4 PSE 2010 PSE project aims: 1.Improve the measurement of poverty, deprivation, social exclusion and standard of living. 2.Measure the change in the nature and extent of poverty and social exclusion over the past ten years. 3.Produce policy-relevant results about the causes and outcomes of poverty and social exclusion and how best to address these problems.

5. 5 PSE 2010 PSE project aims – N. Ireland specific 1.The extent to which poverty and social exclusion vary across the nine dimensions of equality specified in Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 2.to compare poverty levels East/West and North/South 3.To assess the impact of the legacies of the conflict on poverty and social exclusion

6. 6 PSE 2010 PSE project activities: 1.Focus groups on basic necessities 2.Omnibus survey: opinion poll of necessities 3.Qualitative interviews: family networks 4.Main survey 5.Work with local communities and mass media (OU)

7. 7 PSE 2010 PSE project activities Domains in Main Survey Housing Fuel poverty Area/neighbourhood deprivation Local services Income change and indebtedness Education & Parenting Employment and working conditions Health and disability Time Social networks and support Necessities Intra-household decisions Poverty over time and subjective poverty Subjective well-being (‘satisfaction’) Harm, crime, criminalisation Critical life events Social and political engagement Experience of the Troubles (N Ireland only)

8. 8 PSE 2010 Why deprivation indicators? 1.UN Summit for Social Development 1995 2.Irish National Anti-Poverty Strategy 1997  ‘Overall poverty’ = low income  ‘Consistent poverty’ = low income + enforced deprivation  2007: Two out of eleven items 3.EU 2009: three of nine items

9. 9 PSE 2010 Ireland 2007EU 2009 Two pairs of strong shoesTo have a washing machine A warm waterproof overcoatTo have a colour TV Buy new not second-hand clothesTo have a car Meat, chicken, fish (…) every second dayMeat, chicken, or fish every second day Roast joint or its equivalent once a weekTo have a telephone Go without heating during the last year through lack of money To pay for arrears (mortgage or rent, utility bills or hire purchase instalments) Keep home adequately warm Presents for family/friends at least once a year Replace any worn out furnitureFace unexpected expenses Have family or friends for a drink or meal once a month One week annual holiday away from home Have a morning, afternoon or evening out in the last fortnight, for entertainment

10. 10 PSE 2010 What deprivation questions for Omnibus survey? 76 items (30 relating to children) Considerations: Comparisons with other surveys Standards and expectations change Expert views not always same as popular views Spectrum of living standards Main innovations: ‘all recommended dental work’ ‘hair done or cut regularly’ ‘table with chairs at which family can eat’ ‘taking part in sport/exercise activities or classes’

11. 11 PSE 2010 Results of Omnibus survey Adult items: 11 items scored  75% including dental work, fresh fruit and veg daily 12 items 55-74% including Church, table + chairs, sport/exercise, contents insurance 4 items borderline majority including car, unexpected expense, shoes, new clothes 10 items 35-44% including holiday, replace furniture, presents, haircut 9 items 30% or below including computer, internet, out socially, dishwasher

12. 12 PSE 2010 Results of Omnibus survey Children’s items: PSE used 30, EU-SILC 2009 used 19 12 items scored ≥ 75% including books, outdoor space, study area, clubs 6 items 55-74% including, internet, family trips, outdoor kit 6 items borderline 47-54% including pocket money, school trips, bicycle, holiday 4 items below 30% including mobile phone (for 11+), MP3 player

13. 13 PSE 2010 Is there a consensus on ‘necessities’? YES but some differences Two pairs all-weather shoes: Women 62%, Men 46% Older 68%, Younger 40% Warm coat: Older 85%, Younger 59% Clothes for job interview: Older 42%, Younger 78% Tertiary 71%, Primary 45% Television: Higher scores: Older, Primary, Less skilled, Disability

14. 14 PSE 2010 Largest divergence of views on necessities is between Older and Younger people

15. 15 PSE 2010 Deprivation measures Pensioners’ deprivation items (DWP) At least one filling meal a day99% Go out socially at least once a month72% See friends or family at least once a month95% Take a holiday away from home 60% Able to replace cooker if it broke down89% Home kept in good state of repair96% Heating, electrics, plumbing and drains working98% Have a damp-free home94% Home kept adequately warm96% Able to pay regular bills96% Have a telephone to use, whenever needed99% Have access to car or taxi, whenever needed90% Have hair done or cut regularly89% Have a warm waterproof coat98% Able to pay an unexpected expense of £20087% Omnibus score (or closest equivalent) (88) (28) (43) 40 (80) 71 - 92 - (72) (50) 36 80 51

16. 16 PSE 2010 Deprivation measures – issues 1. Three categories? Pensioners, Children and Overall 2. Prevalence weighting a) DWP May 2011 new measure – score of 20 for pensioners, 25 for children b) Non-monetary reasons for lacking items 3. Deprivation rate (EU-SILC): Proportion lacking 3 or more out of 9 items e.g. 2010: 13.4% UK 19.6% Ireland (S) 4. Consensus vs expert? 5 of 11 deprivation items in Ireland measure are below 50% threshold in N Ireland Omnibus 3 of 9 EU deprivation items are below or on margins of 50% threshold in N Ireland Omnibus

17. 17 PSE 2010 Deprivation measures – issues Low income and/or deprivation? Low income 70/60/50% of median (UK/NI?) (BHC or AHC?) Deprivation score severity? ‘Consistent’ poverty

18. 18 PSE 2010 Conclusion 1.Technical issues a)Are individual items valid indicators of PSE? b)Do individual items add to the picture of PSE? c)Is the group of items reliably related to underlying PSE concept? 2. Policy issues a)One measure or multiple measures (older, younger etc) b)How can deprivation data inform priorities and targets? c)What use is PSE measurement research to low income communities/areas? …and please follow us on Twitter @PSE2010