1. Snow and Ice Maintenance Tenders and Contract Interpretation Robert Kennaley McLauchlin & Associates

2. Understanding and Managing Risk under a Contract is important regardless of whose form of Contract is proposed Understanding the difference between a good contract and a bad contract is critical Good vs. Bad Contracts

3. Historical Problems with Contracts: Inadequate Descriptions of the Work - vague, ambiguous, inconsistent and confusing descriptions of the work Good vs. Bad Contracts

4. Historical Problems with Contracts: Contractors Assume Too Much Liability- - Over-reaching “Hold Harmless” Clauses - Over-reaching Scopes of Work Good vs. Bad Contracts

5. Liability Starts with the Occupier under the Occupier’s Liability Act The Owner/Property Manager/Client will be an Occupier under the Act The Contract and Scope of Work

6. The Owner/Property Manager/Client can assign under a Contract some of its responsibilities under the Act The Contractor becomes responsible to meet the obligations he assumed under the Contract The Contract and Scope of Work

7. The Contractor is not responsible to do work, undertake tasks or assume risk unless he has, either expressly or by implication, agreed to do so under the Contract It is accordingly critical that the Scope of Work be properly described in the Contract The Contract and Scope of Work

8. To Properly Price the Work and Avoid Disputes the Contractor Needs to: - understand the Scope of Work - not assume any unreasonable obligations under the Contract - avoid obligations he is not being paid to assume The Contract and Scope of Work

9. To Properly Get a Good Price and Avoid Disputes, the Owner Needs to: - provide a clear Scope of Work - avoid unreasonable or impossible requirements (which are expensive to price) (which can lead to disputes) The Contract and Scope of Work

10. The Overreaching Scope of Work: - Promising the Impossible - Promising the Unknown - The “open by” Undertaking - The problem of the “Second Pass” The Contract and Scope of Work

11. Contractual Terms can be Divided into Two Parts: 1. General Conditions –Generally apply to all projects 2. Specific Conditions / Schedules –Specifies work to be performed –Specifies price –Usually varies from project to project

12. 1. General Conditions –The Parties –Payment Provisions –Workplace Safety & Insurance Issues –Notice Provisions –Indemnification Provisions –Termination Provisions –Insurance Provisions The Contract and Scope of Work

13. General Conditions Should be unique to Winter Maintenance Industry !! Parked Vehicles Improperly Maintained Premises Severe weather conditions? Stop work orders Strikes, lock-outs, etc. The Contract and Scope of Work

14. 2. Specifications / Schedules / Site Plans Should be made part of the Contract These are More Important than the Legalese The Contract and Scope of Work

15. 2. Specifications / Schedules / Site Plans Site Plans Should Be Used!!! These Should be Made a Schedule Particular Limitations / Issues Can and Should be Addressed in the Site Plans

16. The Site Plan Should Clearly and Accurately Describe: –The work to be performed –Any limitations on the scope of work –Site conditions –Special site features to be considered The Contract and Scope of Work

17. Discretion to Use Ice Melters To Avoid Disputes Contracts should clarify the contractor’s obligation to use ice melting products Contracts Should Clearly Specify who makes the decision about the application of ice melting products… … either it is the Contractor or the Client

18. Liability for the Slip and Fall the Contractor Generally Avoids Liability: – if he properly performs his contract; – if he is not otherwise Negligent; – and so long as he has not assumed responsibility to do more than properly perform his work under the Contract – this is often done through the over-reaching ‘Hold Harmless Clause’

19. Indemnification should only occur where the contractor breaches the contract or is negligent in the performance of his work as specified Indemnification should also be limited to damages for personal injury or property damage, and to the limits of the Contractor’s insurance Hold-Harmless & Indemnification

20. What are the Options where less than clear, or less than preferred, contractual terms are put out to tender? Don’t Counter Offer! Don’t Qualify or Clarify Your Bid!! Contracts put out to Tender

21. M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 619 –the low bidder had added a handwritten note to the tender form, increasing its price in the event a certain pipe was to be used –M.J.B. was the second low bidder Contracts put out to Tender

22. M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 619 –MJB objected that it should have been awarded the Contract as the note was a qualification which: rendered the low bid non-compliant; and rendered the low bid incapable of acceptance Contracts put out to Tender

23. M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 619 –The Owner relied on the privilege clause: “The lowest or any tender not necessarily accepted” –The Owner argued that the clause allowed it to award to even a non-compliant bidder Contracts put out to Tender

24. M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 619 –The Court: found an implied term that only compliant bids would be considered held that the privilege clause did not allow the Owner to award to non-compliant bidder Contracts put out to Tender

25. Bidding Contractors Who Qualify or Clarify their Bids run the risk that their Bids will be rejected out of hand as being non-compliant! In fact, Tendering Authorities are now well versed in the Law of Tendering and will generally not consider non-compliant bids. Contracts put out to Tender

26. Contractors who are concerned about the terms of a Contract put out to Tender can: - request a clarification from the Owner/Consultant in accordance with the terms of the Tender Package; - (in which case the Owner/Consultant is to issue the response to all bidding contractors) Contracts put out to Tender

27. Contractors who are concerned about the terms of a Contract put out to Tender can: - request that the terms, perhaps be changed; - (in which case the Owner/Consultant can issue an Addendum, if so inclined) Contracts put out to Tender

28. Contractors who are concerned about the terms of a Contract put out to Tender can: - price the risk assumption or refuse to bid the Contract. Contracts put out to Tender

29. Snow and Ice Maintenance Tenders and Contract Interpretation Robert Kennaley McLauchlin & Associates