2. Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

3. Sequent Notation for Arguments Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

4. Sequent Notation for Arguments Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

5. Translating Arguments If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

6. Translating Arguments If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R.

7. Translating Arguments If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R

8. Translating Arguments If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R R>W, W | R

9. Sequent Notation: R>W, W | R Vertical Notation: R>W W R Translating Arguments If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTAND attack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R.

10. Translating Arguments Which sentence is the conclusion? Premise Indicators: Since Because For : Conclusion Indicators: So Therefore Hence Thus Consequently :

11. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

12. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P.

13. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P. P > I

14. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P. WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates a PREMISE! P > I

15. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P. ConclusionPremise

16. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P ConclusionPremise

17. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. P because I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P I, I>P | P ConclusionPremise

18. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators.

19. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

20. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE. E because C. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

21. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE. E because C. ConclusionPremise The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

22. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE. E because C. ConclusionPremise C | E The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

23. Translating Arguments Why > is different from |. The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE. E because C. ConclusionPremise C | E The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E Click here for more