Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EFFECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EFFECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION"— Presentation transcript:

1 EFFECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
Al Hermsen, Director Office of Student Financial Aid WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY

2 WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
Large urban public school – Detroit, Michigan 32,000 students 20,000 undergrads and 12,000 grad/professional students Medical, Law and Pharmacy schools Founded in 1867 82% of the students receive some form of financial aid

3 Data Analysis Needs Funding needs Monitor spending
Final reports with details Comparisons to other schools National trends Longitudinal reports Operating funds

4 Funding needs Analyze your school needs Compare to other schools
Set goals Explain goals to budget team Get commitment

5 Packaging Survey

6 p The equity packaging model for need based aid provides sufficient funding for tuition and fees without loans. Graph before new model:

7 Equity Packaging Model
After New Model was Implemented EFC RANGE 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 # STUDENTS 4281 625 470 392 345 287 330 226 63

8 Loans to Meet Cost of Attendance
Several types of loans are needed to meet the cost of attendance for students

9 Monthly Spending and Projection
Program Budget Buffer Summer Fall Est. F/W Spring Est. Exp. Balance Campus-based Health Prof. Other Federal Direct Loans Total Federal State Programs Inst. Need-based Inst. Merit based Graduate awards

10

11

12 Comparison to other schools
College Navigator Check other school websites Survey of competitor schools

13 Packaging Survey

14

15 Average Estimated Undergraduate Budgets, 2010-11 (Enrollment-Weighted)
SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 1.

16 Average Annual Percentage Increases in Inflation-Adjusted Published Prices by Decade, to SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing, Figure 4

17 Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities Average Tuition and Fee and Room and Board (TFRB) Charges by College Board Region, in Constant 2010 Dollars, and (Enrollment-Weighted) SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 6.

18 Net Price: Public Two-Year Colleges Full-Time Students by Dependency Status and Family Income, SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 8B.

19 State Appropriations for Higher Education per $1,000 in Personal Income by State, (including Federal Stimulus Funds) SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 11B.

20 Percentage Growth in Mean Family Income by Quintile in Constant 2009 Dollars, 1979–1989, 1989–1999, and 1999–2009 SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 16A.

21 Median Family Income by Selected Characteristics, 2009
SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in College Pricing 2010, Figure 16B.

22

23 Ten-Year Trend in Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans per FTE Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in Constant 2009 Dollars, to Total financial aid per full-time equivalent (FTE) student increased 51%, from $8,894 (in constant 2009 dollars) in to $13,444 in SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 1.

24 Undergraduate Student Aid by Source (in Billions), 2009-10
Total Undergraduate and Graduate Student Aid by Type In , federal loans constituted 43% of student aid received by undergraduates and 69% of total graduate student aid. Federal grants constituted 26% of the financial aid on which undergraduate students relied, but only 3% of the aid to graduate students. The 17% of undergraduate aid in the form of institutional grants in constituted 32% of all undergraduate grant aid. The federal government provided 49% of undergraduate grant aid. The 16% of graduate student aid in the form of institutional grants in constituted 59% of all grant aid for graduate students. Colleges and universities also provided fellowships and assistantships to many graduate students. The 9% of graduate student aid in the form of grants from employers and other private sources constituted 31% of all grants to graduate students. SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 2A.

25 SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 10A.
Average Student Debt per Borrower and Average Student Debt per Graduate Public Four-Year Bachelor’s Degree Recipients to (in Constant 2009 dollars) Student Debt The $20,300 average debt among the 55% of public college bachelor’s degree recipients who borrowed was only slightly higher than the average. However, 65% of private nonprofit bachelor’s degree recipients had an average student loan debt of $25,900, an increase from 63% with an average debt of $22,300 (in 2009 dollars) in In each year from to , 52% to 55% of public college bachelor’s degree recipients graduated with student loan debt, while 45% to 48% did not borrow to finance their education. When the total student loan debt of bachelor’s degree recipients is divided across all graduates, including those who did not borrow, average debt levels at public four-year colleges ranged from $10,000 (in 2009 dollars) in and to $11,600 in In each year from to , 63% to 66% of private nonprofit bachelor’s degree recipients graduated with student loan debt, while 34% to 37% did not borrow to finance their education. When the total debt of bachelor’s degree recipients is divided across all graduates, including those who did not borrow, average student loan debt levels at private nonprofit four-year colleges ranged from $13,900 in (in 2009 dollars) to $17,900 in Because borrowing has increased more rapidly in private than in public colleges, the average debt level of public four-year college graduates who borrowed declined from 87% of the average debt level of private nonprofit four-year college graduates who borrowed in to 78% in Debt per public college bachelor’s degree recipient declined from 74% of debt per private college bachelor’s degree recipient in to 67% in SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 10A.

26 Average Aid per Undergraduate FTE, 1994-95 to 2009-10 in Constant 2009 Dollars
Total Aid per Full-Time Equivalent Student In , undergraduate students received an average of $11,461 in aid per full-time equivalent (FTE) student, including $6,041 in grants from all sources and $4,883 in federal loans. Graduate students received an average of $22,697 in aid per FTE, including $6,371 in grants and $15,744 in federal loans. Total grant aid per full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student increased at an average rate of 2.8% per year in inflation-adjusted dollars from to , 4.4% per year from 1999‑2000 to , and 5.3% per year from to Federal loans per FTE undergraduate student increased at an average rate of 2.7% per year in inflation-adjusted dollars from 1994‑95 to 1999‑2000, 4.0% per year from 1999‑2000 to 2004‑05, and 6.0% per year from 2004‑05 to 2009‑10. Total grant aid per FTE graduate student increased at an average rate of 10.1% per year in inflation-adjusted dollars from 1994‑95 to 1999‑2000, decreased by 2.2% per year from 1999‑2000 to 2004‑05, and increased by 3.5% per year from 2004‑05 to Federal loans per FTE graduate student increased at an average rate of 3.2% per year in inflation-adjusted dollars from 1994‑95 to 1999‑2000, 4.8% per year from 1999‑2000 to 2004‑05, and 5.8% per year from 2004‑05 to 2009‑10. SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 11A.

27 Percentage Distribution of Pell Grant Recipients by Family Income and Dependency Status, 2008-09
Pell Grants In , 41% of Pell Grant recipients were dependent students, and 61% of this group came from families with incomes of $30,000 or less. Students who are 24 years of age or older, are married, have dependents, are veterans or on active military duty, or are orphans or wards of the court are considered independent. Their eligibility for federal student aid depends on their own resources and those of their spouses, but not their parents. Forty percent of Pell Grant recipients were independent students with dependents of their own, and 19% were independent without dependents. In , almost one-quarter of all Pell Grant recipients were over the age of 30. SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 14A.

28 Percentage Distribution of Pell Grant Recipients by Age, 2008-09
Pell Grants In , 41% of Pell Grant recipients were dependent students, and 61% of this group came from families with incomes of $30,000 or less. Students who are 24 years of age or older, are married, have dependents, are veterans or on active military duty, or are orphans or wards of the court are considered independent. Their eligibility for federal student aid depends on their own resources and those of their spouses, but not their parents. Forty percent of Pell Grant recipients were independent students with dependents of their own, and 19% were independent without dependents. In , almost one-quarter of all Pell Grant recipients were over the age of 30. SOURCE: The College Board, Trends in Student Aid 2010, Figure 14B.

29 “Trends” web-site For more information, visit: trends.collegeboard.org

30 Longitudinal Reports Develop your own trends reports
Follow examples from College Board or others

31 Increased Need for Financial Aid
The effect of the economy has lead to a 44% increase in financial aid applications

32 Increase in Undergraduate Aid
Financial aid to undergraduates increased 62.5%. 84% of undergraduates receive some aid.

33 Increases in Gift Aid Large increases in Pell Grants and BOG awards have increased need-based funding 142% Increased institutional merit awards have been offset by State and Federal merit aid decreases

34

35 Al Hermsen Senior Director Office of Financial Aid Wayne State University

36 QUESTIONS?


Download ppt "EFFECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google