Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKyla Scrogham Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rumin Wang G. R.. Lu& Y. D. Yang Work done in collaboration with G. R.. Lu & Y. D. Yang Huazhong Normal University Henan Normal University November 15, 2005, Beijing
2
2 Motivation Theoretical input Summary Outline
3
3 To solve the polarization anomaly To solve the puzzles Motivation for study
4
4 Decay amplitude of B to VV in helicity basis: Decay amplitudes in transversity basis: Longitudinal polarization fraction: ( ~0.9 in SM )
5
5 Tree + penguin : ( Sensitive to NP ) Pure penguin ( Sensitive to NP ) : ?? Surprise
6
6 Previous study Kagan show increasing nonfactorizable contribution of annihilation diagram to solve anomaly by QCDF( hep-ph/0407076 ). But H.n. Li & Mishima: annihilation contribution is not sufficient to lower f L down to 0.5 by PQCD ( PRD 71,054025 ). Polarization anomaly might be due to large charming penguin contributions and final-state-interactions (FSI) by Colangelo et al. & Ladisa et al. ( PLB 597,291; PRD 70,115014 ). However, H. Y. Cheng et al. have found the FSI effects not able to fully account for this anomaly ( PRD 71, 014030 ). We try to solve this anomaly including RPV SUSY effects.
7
7 To solve the polarization anomaly To solve the puzzles Motivation for study
8
8 1.5x10^(-6) 10^(-7) 4.6x10^(-6) 8.3x10^(-6) 0.319 -0.057 ?
9
9 But But -0.120 0.063 in Exp. 11.4x10^(-6) 6.0x10^(-6) ?
10
10 Previous study Buras et al. point out B to pi pi can be nicely accommodated in the SM through nonfactorizable hadronic interference effects, whereas B to pi K system may indicate NP in the electroweak penguin sector (PRL 92,101804; NPB 697,133). H. N. Li et al. & Y. D. Yang et al. study the next to leading order corrections by PQCD & QCDF, respectively. These higher order corrections may be important for Br(B to pi K), but the can not explain other experimental data( hep-ph/0508041;PRD72,074007 ). NP We try to calculate RPV SUSY effects.
11
11 Motivation Theoretical input Summary Outline
12
12 Theoretical input The effective Hamiltonian in SM R-parity Violating SUSY QCD Factorization
13
13 The effective Hamiltonian in SM The effective weak Hamiltonian for B decays: Qi are local four-quark operators The decay amplitude in SM:
14
14 S is the particle spin B is the baryon number L is the lepton number R-parity violating superpotential: R-parity Violating SUSY : Yukawa couplings i, j,k : generation indices C : charge conjugate field
15
15 The four fermion effective Hamiltonians due to the exchanging of the sleptons: The effective Hamiltonians due to the exchanging of the squarks:
16
16 R-parity Violating decay amplitude:
17
17 The total decay amplitude: Naïve factorization, Generalized factorization, QCD factorization, Perturbative QCD, Light-cone QCD sum rules, Lattice QCD, Soft-collinear effective theory, etc.
18
18 BBNS approach: PRL 83:1914-1917,1999 NPB 591:313-418, 2000 Naïve Factorization: QCD Factorization: QCD Factorization
19
19 Motivation Theoretical input Summary Outline
20
20 Based on paper: Phys.Rev.D72:015009(2005)
21
21 Longitudinal polarization Polarization Anomaly !! RPV SUSY ?
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26 The polarization anomaly could be solved by RPV effects.
27
27 Motivation Theoretical input Summary Outline
28
28 Based on paper: hep-ph/0509273
29
29 Branching ratios Puzzle !!
30
30 Direct CP asymmetries Puzzle !! RPV SUSY ?
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36 Motivation Theoretical input Summary Outline
37
37 Summary Employed QCDF to study RPV SUSY effects in following modes: o Polarization in B to VV. o Branching ratios & direct CP asymmetry in B to pi pi, pi K. RPV couplings can give a possible solution to the puzzles. Obtain the ranges of RPV couplings, but these are very narrow. The allowed spaces constrained by B to PP are consistent with these by B to VV decays. An explanation is need: o SM is in no way ruled out. o Existence of New Physics. o Many more measurement are in progress.
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41 R-parity Violating decay:
42
42 Ratios of branching ratios
43
43 Branching ratios
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.