1. 11th SELL Meeting Oporto, Portugal 3-4 june 2011

2.  Spanish players at Consortia game  Activities  Main agreements  Steps so far  Spanish scenario  Challenges ahead  CBUC overview  CSIC Library overview

3.  Different teams- the same ground Formal consortia (CBUC,CBUA,BUGALICIA,MADROÑO,BUCLE) Purchase Groups (G9,CCCL) Institutions as a consortia (CSIC) REBIUN Spanish Universities Network FECYT (Spanish Science Foundation)  Funds 60/80% from autonoums governments % from members  Permanent offices and satff vs. rolling management  Mainly univerisities and scientific libraries  Exists since 1996-till 2001, now more than 10 years old! >experience  Lack of a national stratetgy, no good governance within FECYT and regional consortia

4.  Drive union catalogs  metasearch+link solvers tools  Licensing e-products (e-journals+e-books)  Training members activities  OA activities: “green way” IR  Other library services: ILL,Storage facilities  Trends: Looking for “discovery tools” Digitization

5.  Mantain contact-Act together Meet twice a year (at least) Share information (numbers and figures).It took so long! Establish common goals yearly (1 or 2) Try to speech as one “voice”

6.  Consortia initiatives (2010-2011): ELSEVIER coordinated negotiation for 3 Spanish consortia (oters follow)  reduction on %increase from 5,5% to 1,5-2% (e-books links) Looking at:  a new-extended WILEY-BLACKWELL agreement  Some Spanish consortia had huge problems with re-negotiating Wiley licenses  New Refworks extended license Boletin ANBAD LX 2010, núm.3 Julio/Sept 2010  Full dedicated to Spanish consortia. Each consortia has an article.

7. Joint iniaitives involving both FECYT and consortia:  ISI Web of Knowledge  The only Spanish national license (2004-)  Fully paid by FECYT till 2009  Co-payed since 2010  Less contents (CC,Derwent Patents, less coverage…)  VAT report  On behalf of Spanish library consortia: what is their fiscal “personality”?  consortia have to invoice their members (for services)  both consortia and members can then ask for VAT devolution  Follow up (?)  OA activities  RECOLECTA harvester  Working groups-closed (statistics,Q&A,Author unique ID…etc)  OA Spain situation Report published by FECYT (http://oaseminar.fecyt.es/Publico/report/index.aspx)  Sherpa portal translated into spanish  SCOUPS national license 2011-2013  With some finacial support from 2011/2013 (7%-22%)

8. 2010 (2011 deals)  Government funding and salaries reduced (5% ~)  Higher VAT (16  18%)  Euro and Pounds weaker than before  Budget restrictions 5%-10%  Cancelations: mainly bbdd 2011 (2012 deals)  Less investment in Science ( -o,8/-1,7) after 14 years  More cuts (10 %)  “big deals” agreements should be revisited  Consortia (libraries) will loose content  E-journals agreements depend on e-books purchase

9.  Till when economic cuts? when we’ll recover?  How to negotiate with publishers with top susbcriptions celing reached?  No space left for possible cancelation without touching “nuclear” collections No print to cancel then e-content should be canceled  Now is time for “Post access” cancellation clauses  OA policies progress- Alhambra declaration follow up  2012 Presiential ballot Government- Ministry changes  Uncertanity

10. CBUC situation 2010-2011  We approved ‘normal’ budgets in 2010  In Feb 2011 the Catalan Govern decided to cut public budgets in a 10%  This does not affect too much our licensing ability (we only have a 14% of central money)  But, universities are financed in a 70% for the administration, and the biggest have important deficit  So, some CBUC members could not to pay ion 2011 the fees already approved  We are planning to cut a 10% (1M€) our licensing power

11. The actions of CBUC orderly retreat  Increase the Spanish coordination between consortia  Explain the situation to providers and ask them for a minus 5% in 2011 bills  Revise and explain to CBUC members how the big deals work  Ask members to value the products and services and put it on order (from the most loved to the less)  Try to define different levels in our digital library (what core collection could be)  Try to explain to the stakeholders how valuable big deals are for them (84% of citations of Catalan researchers came form CBUC licensed content)

12. And to continue working hardly  Introducing consortial borrowing  Reinforcing our repositories  Using Primo User Interface to access the licensed content  Amplifying the number of libraries that work with us

13.  76 physical libraries  211 staff  38.600 m2  95.700 lineal m.  1.747 seats  14.144 registered users  4.500 FTE  Tools in use: ALEPH,METALI´B-SFX DSPACE GOOBI RFID systems EndNote+Refworks o Looking for Discovery Tool

14.  1.658.578 book print titles  67.288 print journal collections (14.073 live)  50.000 archival item materials  71.000 authority items  2.270.000 OPAC seraches  53.600 loans  49.401 ILL transactions 14

15.  212.000 e-book titles  8.687 e-journals titles  33 databases  4.113.735 seraches on e- items  2.667.328 FT downloads  Publishers we deal with: ELSEVIER,SPRINGER,WILEY- BLACKWELL, OUP, CUP, ACS,AGU,AIP,ASM,AR,BIOMEDC ENTRAL,WG,IOP,JSTOR,MUSE,N PG,MAL,PNAS,RSC,SCIENCE,CH UP,BRILL,EMERALD,T&F 15

16.  33.300 items on CSIC IR DIGITAL.CSIC  1.807.249 visits x year  2.613.676 downloads x year  One of the most important scientific IR in Spain 16

17.  9,7 M € for scientific information  4,9 M € for staff 17  321.000 € books  8.801521 € serials  438.287 € ddbb  155.825 € other