Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Cervical Mobilization

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Cervical Mobilization"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Cervical Mobilization
Kristofferson G. Mendoza, PTRP Department of Physical Therapy College of Allied Medical Professions University of the Philippines Manila All Rights Reserved 2009

3 Learning Objectives By the end of the learning session, the student should be able to: Explain relevant concepts in cervical mobilization Explain theoretical rationale behind the effects and use of cervical mobilization State principles and guidelines related to the proper application of cervical mobilization

4 Learning Objectives Identify indications, contraindications and precautions in the application of cervical mobilization Describe cervical mobilization techniques in terms procedure, dosimetry, use and rationale Identify special considerations in the application of cervical mobilization

5 Learning Objectives Given a simulated patient care situation, demonstrate cervical mobilization techniques with correct procedure and patient care skills Given a simulated patient care situation, communicate the treatment rationale, procedure, risk(s) involved, and expected outcome clearly and concisely

6 Review of Relevant Concepts

7 Shape of Joint Surfaces
Review of Kinematics Shape of Joint Surfaces Ovoid Sellar

8 Review of Kinematics Joint Movements Physiologic Accessory
Physiological movements are movements the patient can do voluntarily The term osteokinematics is used when these motions of the bones are described. Accessory movements are movements in the joint and surrounding tissues that are necessary for normal ROM but that cannot be actively performed by the patient.

9 Review of Kinematics Accessory Movements Component Motions Joint Play
Component motions are those motions that accompany active motion but are not under voluntary control. The term is often used synonymously with accessory movement. upward rotation of the scapula and rotation of the clavicle, which occur with shoulder flexion, rotation of the fibula, which occurs with ankle motions Joint play describes the motions that occur between the joint surfaces and also the distensibility or “give” in the joint capsule, which allows the bones to move. The movements are necessary for normal joint functioning through the ROM and can be demonstrated passively, but they cannot be performed actively by the patient The movements include distraction, sliding,compression, rolling, and spinning of the joint surfaces. arthrokinematics

10 (Hertling & Kessler, 1996; Tomberlin & Saunders, 1995)
Review of Kinematics Joint Play (Hertling & Kessler, 1996; Tomberlin & Saunders, 1995) Distraction Compression Sliding / gliding Rolling Combined rolling and sliding /gliding Spinning

11 Review of Kinematics Convex-Concave Rule

12 Review of Kinematics Joint Positions Open-packed Closed-packed

13 Review of Relevant Anatomy

14 Review of Relevant Anatomy

15 Review of Relevant Anatomy

16 Review of Relevant Anatomy

17 Review of Mobilization Concepts
Mobilization vs. manipulation (thrust) Self-mobilization / automobilization Mobilization with movement (Mulligan’s techniques / natural apophyseal glides) Mobilization are passive, skilled manual therapy techniques applied to joints and related soft tissues at varying speeds and amplitudes using physiological or accessory motions for therapeutic purposes. Thrust is a high-velocity, short-amplitude motion such that the patient cannot prevent the motion. The motion is performed at the end of the pathological limit of the joint and is intended to alter positional relationships, snap adhesions, or stimulate joint receptors. Self-mobilization refers to self-stretching techniques that specifically use joint traction or glides that direct the stretch force to the joint capsule. Mobilization with movement (MWM) is the concurrent application of sustained accessory mobilization applied by a therapist and an active physiological movement to end range applied by the patient. Passive end-of-range overpressure, or stretching, is then delivered without pain as a barrier.

18 Review of Mobilization Concepts
Barrier concept for normal joint motion and joint motion with somatic dysfunction (Kimberley, 1970)

19 physiologic motion is limited by a physiologic barrier
tension develops within the surrounding tissues (joint capsule, ligaments and connective tissue)

20 additional amount of passive range of motion can be performed
the anatomic barrier cannot be exceeded without disrupting the joints integrity

21 Cervical Mob Cervical Mob

22 Rationale Neurophysiological mechanisms for reduction of pain and muscle spasm Mechanical mechanisms for increase in tissue length, strength and rate of healing (via improved nutrition) Psychological mechanisms for reduction of pain-fear cycle and for placebo effect Neurophysiological Small-amplitude oscillatory and distraction movements are used to stimulate the mechanoreceptors that may inhibit the transmission of nociceptive stimuli at the spinal cord or brain stem levels. Mechanical Small-amplitude distraction or gliding movements of the joint are used to cause synovial fluid motion, which is the vehicle for bringing nutrients to the avascular portions of the articular cartilage (and intra-articular fibrocartilage when present). Gentle joint-play techniques help maintain nutrient exchange and thus prevent the painful and degenerating effects of stasis when a joint is swollen or painful and cannot move through the ROM. Psychological benefits of manual therapy that have been reported related to such factors as "the laying on of hands” the application of a faith healer's hands to the patient's body faith cure, faith healing - care provided through prayer and faith in God reducing a pain-fear cycle, and the charisma of the clinician. Avoid worry, which leads to fear and more pain Harris & Lundgren (1991).

23 Rationale Improvement of the hydrostatics of the IV disc and vertebral bodies Enhancement of joint nutrition through increased synovial fluid movement Activation of type I and II mechano-receptors in the facet joint capsule to influence the spinal gating mechanism Static position and sense of speed of movement (type I receptors found in the superficial joint capsule) Change of speed of movement (type II receptors found in deep layers of the joint capsule and articular fat pads)

24 Rationale Alter the activity of the neuromuscular spindle in intrinsic muscles of the segment to affect bias in the grey matter Assist the pumping effect of the venous plexus of the vertebral segment Stress reduction on hypermobile joints by mobilizing hypomobile joints

25 Rationale Enhancement of tissue flexibility, replacement tissue strength, and rate of healing Enhancement of joint position and motion sense through stimulation of proprioceptors Placebo / psychological effect (?)

26 Indications Joint pain and muscle spasm Reversible joint hypomobility
Positional faults / subluxations* Progressive limitation Functional immobility

27 Absolute Contraindications
Bacterial infection in the joint Malignancy in the area Spinal cord, cauda equina compression Recent or unhealed fracture in the area Osteoporosis Where technique produces VBI symptoms

28 Relative Contraindications
Joint effusion or inflammation Arthroses / ankylosis; internal joint derangement (e.g., collagen necrosis of ligaments or capsule in RA) Nerve root irritation; reproduction of distal symptoms Joint hypermobility*

29 Relative Contraindications
Excessive pain; irritable conditions Unhealed fracture in associated areas Joint hypermobility in associated areas Newly formed / weakened CT due to injury, surgery or disuse / debilitation Older people, pregnant women, children

30 Criteria for correct application
Knowledge of relative shapes of joint surfaces (concave or convex) Duration, type, and irritability of symptoms Patient and clinician position Position of joint to be treated Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

31 Criteria for correct application
Hand placement Specificity Direction of force Amount of force Reinforcement of any gains made Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

32 Technique Posterior-anterior central vertebral pressure (PACVP or PAs)
Indications Treatment of a painful presentation For discogenic presentations; For symptoms occurring centrally and/or bilaterally In those causing restrictions of movement in the sagittal plane more than other directions

33 Technique Medially and laterally inclined unilateral vertebral pressure Indications Treatment of a painful presentation, or of resistance present through range Laterally inclined techniques tend to be more useful in painful presentations Medially inclined techniques are often more helpful when the aim is to be provocative or to alter resistance Unilateral technique often useful for unilateral presentations

34 Technique Rotational Mobilization Unilateral signs and symptoms
Aim is to produce a pure and localized rotation movement at a given intervertebral level Indications Unilateral signs and symptoms Irritable condition rotate away from pain Assists in improving rotation range of motion Assists in improving lateral flexion

35 Technique Lateral Flexion Mobilization Unilateral signs and symptoms
Aim is to produce a pure and localized lateral flexion at a given intervertebral level Indications Unilateral signs and symptoms Irritable condition laterally flex away from pain Assists in improving lateral flexion Assists in improving rotation range of motion

36 Technique Longitudinal Traction

37 Glide Sustained glide (Kaltenborn)

38 Oscillations Oscillations (Maitland)

39 Oscillations Oscillations (Maitland)

40 Dosimetry Sustained distraction, glide
20 sec - 30 sec (In: Dutton, 2004) 6/7 sec -10 sec (In: Kisner & Colby, 2002) Oscillations sec (In: Dutton, 2004) sec (In: Kisner & Colby, 2002)

41 Use Based on Chronicity
Grade I and II techniques acute duration of symptoms Grade II and III techniques sub-acute duration of symptoms Grade III (or IV) techniques chronic duration of symptoms

42 Pain-Guided Use Pain is constant even at rest, rises quickly on movement, or appears early in the range and rises to a level sufficient to stop the movement well before the normal limit. Small amplitude, gentle, and confined to the beginning of the available range

43 Pain-Guided Use No pain at rest; pain only begins after more than half the range has been traversed Move into the pain a bit, and even up to the limit with care

44 Pain-Guided Use Block by spasm, more than pain
Grade IV technique, up to the point of spasm so long as it occurs beyond half the range If pain occurs before that, lower grade the earlier the spasm, the lower the grade

45 Pain-Guided Use Block by inert tissue tension or compression, with negligible pain or spasm Grade IV technique [grade V technique may be indicated]`

46 Mulligan’s NAGS

47 Mulligan’s NAGS

48 Mulligan’s NAGS

49 SNAGS (Mobilization With Movement)
Mulligan’s SNAG Application of sustained manual gliding force to a joint with concurrent physiologic motion of the joint, either actively performed by the patient or passively performed by the clinician, with the intent of causing a repositioning of “bony positional faults” Mulligan’s NAGS and SNAGS are based on belief that “bony positional faults” can contribute substantially to painful joint restrictions. αMulligan (1992; 1993). Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

50 SNAGS (Mobilization With Movement)
Force applied parallel to plane of motion Force sustained throughout movement, until joint returns to starting position Pain must not be produced at any time during MWM application; otherwise, MWM would be contraindicated Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

51

52 Self SNAGS

53 Passive-Angular vs. Joint-Glide stretching
What is the score? Passive-angular stretching procedures as when the bony lever is used to stretch a tight joint capsule, may cause increased pain or joint trauma because: The use of a lever significantly magnifies the force at the joint. The force causes excessive joint compression in the direction of the rolling bone The roll without a slide does not replicate normal joint mechanics. Joint glide (mobilization) stretching procedures, as when the translatoric slide component of the bones is used to stretch a tight capsule, are safer and more selective because: The force is applied close to the joint surface and controlled at an intensity compatible with the pathology. The direction of the force replicates the sliding component of the joint mechanics and does not compress the cartilage. The amplitude of the motion is small yet specific to the restricted or adherent portion of the capsule or ligaments. Thus, the forces are selectively applied to the desired tissue.

54 Cervical Mobilization Within the Total Care Plan
Acute care PRICEMEM protocol Sub-acute care; chronic care Gentle oscillations, moist heat for relaxation Glide stretch prior to angular stretch Dynamic spinal stabilization techniques Active use of new range Automobilization at home ,

55 Is there evidence that joint mobilization is better than angular stretching in increasing range of motion in patient’s with burn injuries of the neck?

56 Upper Limb Neurodynamic Mobilization
Kristofferson G. Mendoza, PTRP Department of Physical Therapy College of Allied Medical Professions University of the Philippines Manila All Rights Reserved 2008

57 Review of Relevant Neuroanatomy

58 Relevant Background Peripheral nerves can adapt to different positions via passive movement relative to the surrounding tissueα Gliding apparatus around the nerve trunk Partially dependent upon the ability of the nerve to move against the surrounding tissue αMillesi (1986). Hand Clinics, 2, Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

59 Relevant Background Proposed mechanisms for dysfunction
Dural adhesions produce excessive tension in the neuromeningeal system, which results in limited movement and pain; possible culprits α: Abnormal posture Direct trauma Extremes of motion Electrical injury Nerve compression αElvey & Hall (1999). Manual Therapy, 4, Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

60 Relevant Background Double-crush injuriesα
Serial compromise of axoplasmic flow (focal lesions) along the same nerve fiber, causing a subclinical lesion at the distal site to become symptomatic (because of denervation) αUpton & McComas (1973). Lancet, 2, Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

61 Common Sites of Compromise
Low cervical region (highly mobile) T5-7 (narrowest spinal canal) L4-5 (strongly tethered to neural ligaments) Elbow and wrist (superficial / mobile joints) Piriformis Head of fibula Ankle joints

62 Neurodynamic Mobility Testing
Brachioplexus (upper limb) tension testsα; slump test; lower limb tension tests Application of controlled mechanical and compressive stresses to the dura and other neurological tissues, both centrally and peripherally Explained by Breig’s “tissue-borrowing” phenomenon* αElvey. In: Glasgow & Twomey (1979). Aspects of manipulative therapy, Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

63 Neurodynamic mobilization
Rationale To improve axonal transport; ergo, to improve nerve conduction velocityα αButler (1992). Mobilization of the nervous system. Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

64 Neurodynamic mobilization
Dosimetryα Initial: passive, gentle, controlled oscillatory movements to the anatomic structures surrounding the neural tissue Later: stretching of both the surrounding and neural tissues together αElvey (1999). Manual Therapy, 4, Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

65 Neurodynamic mobilization
Principles of Treatment Intensity depends on the irritability of the tissue, patient’s response and changes in symptoms If restriction is primarily tension, stretch force is held 15 to 20 seconds, released then repeated several times Tingling or numbness should not last when stretch is released

66 Neurodynamic mobilization
Principles of Treatment Position patient to the point of tension , then actively or passively more one joint in the pattern in such a way as to stretch then release the tension After several treatments and the tissue response is known, self-stretching is taught

67 ULTT1 – median nerve biasα
Shoulder girdle depression Glenohumeral abduction (~110 deg) Wrist and finger extension Forearm supination Shouler ER Elbow extension Cervical lateral flexion toward or away from the test UE (sensitizing maneuver)* Patient in supine αButler. In: Grant (1994). Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine, 219. Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

68 ULTT2 – radial nerve biasα
Shoulder girdle depression Glenohumeral abduction (~10 deg), Forearm pronation Internal rotation (or ER*) Wrist, finger, and thumb flexion Cervical lateral flexion toward or away from the test UE Patient in supine, elbow extended αButler. In: Grant (1994). Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine, 232. Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

69 ULTT2 – ulnar nerve biasα
Wrist, finger, and thumb extension Forearm supination Elbow flexion (full) Shoulder girdle depression Glenohumeral abduction (slight) Cervical lateral flexion toward or away from the test UE Patient in supine αButler. In: Grant (1994). Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine, 232. Cited in Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

70 Self-mobilization αDutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hill.

71 Contraindications Recent onset or worsening of neurological signs
Cauda equina lesions Injury to the spinal cord

72 Is there evidence that neural mobilization is effective in decreasing pain in patient’s with chronic brachial plexus injury?

73 Sources Kisner C, & Colby LA (2002). Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques (4th ed.). PA: FA Davis. Dutton (2004). Orthopaedic examination, evaluation, & intervention. NY: McGraw-Hilll Magee (2002). Orthopedic physical Assessment (4th ed.). Phil: Saunders. Gorgon, E.J. (2007). Cervical Mobilization Lecture. Uy, J. (2002). Cervical Mobilization Seminar Handout.

74 Thank You


Download ppt "Cervical Mobilization"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google