Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis

Published byLuc Wallett Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis"— Presentation transcript:

1 GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis
Michael H. Swanger, Ph.D. CASE Center Georgia Tech

2 Topics Background Simple Modal Damping
Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping Rayleigh Proportional Damping The Viscous Damper Element General Composite Modal Damping New Damping Models/Functions

3 Background

4 Simple Modal Damping DAMPING RATIOS 0.05 5 0.03 7 0.02 10
TRANSIENT LOAD ‘TH1’ SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X FILE ‘ELCENTRO’ INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 55.0 AT 0.01 END LOAD LIST ‘TH1’ PERFORM TRANSIENT ANALYSIS RESPONSE SPECTRUM LOAD ‘RS1’ TRANSLATION X 1.0 FILE ‘RSCurve1’ LOAD LIST ‘RS1’ PERFORM RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS

5 Simple Modal Damping Frequency-dependent Damping Ratios Per NRC Reg. 1
Simple Modal Damping Frequency-dependent Damping Ratios Per NRC Reg. 1.61, March 2007

6 Simple Modal Damping STORE RESPONSE SPECTRUM …
Design Response Spectrum per FEMA 356

7 Simple Modal Damping UNITS IN LBS CYC SEC StdMASS CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM ACCELERATION LINEAR VS FREQUENCY LINEAR FILE 'RS1‘ FREQUENCY RANGE FROM TO AT DAMPING RATIOS USE ACCELERATION TIME HISTORY FILES 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE USING DUHAMEL DIVISOR END OF CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

8 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping

9 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping Recommended Modal Damping Values per NRC Reg. 1.61, March 2007

10 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0 DFX 0.04 INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 DAMPING 0.04 CONSTANTS MODAL DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS 0.04 MEMBERS GROUP 'beams' MODAL DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS 0.04 MEMBERS GROUP 'columns‘ eigenvalue analysis DYNAMIC PARAMETERS RESPONSE DAMPING STIFFNESS 1.0 MASS 0.0 END COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS AVERAGE

11 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
Uniform Damping, Damping Ratios: All Components 4% TYPE PLANE FRAME XY MATERIAL STEEL OUTPUT LONG NAME UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT COORDINATES $ Name X coord Y coord $ 1 X Y 2 X Y . 18 X Y 19 X Y 20 X Y DEFINE GROUP 'support' ADD JOINTS 1 to 5 STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'support' $* ** $* ** Modal damping ratio for spring support $* ** stiffnesses JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0 DFX 0.04

12 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
$* ** $* ** Eigenvalue analysis INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 EIGENVALUE PARAMETERS SOLVE USING GTLANCZOS NUMBER OF MODES 20 PRINT MAX END DYNAMIC ANALYSIS EIGENVALUE $* ** Compute weighted average composite modal $* ** damping ratios DYNAMIC PARAMETERS RESPONSE DAMPING STIFFNESS 1.0 COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS AVERAGE $* ** Response spectrum analsis UNITS INCHES CYCLES CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM ACCELERATION LIN VS FREQUENCY LIN FILE 'RS' FREQUENCY RANGE FROM TO AT DAMPING RATIOS 0.04 USE ACCELERATION TIME HISTORY FILES 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE USING DUHAMEL DIVISOR END OF CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM MEMBER INCIDENCES $ Name Start joint End joint $ $ Columns . DEFINE GROUP 'columns' ADD MEMBERS 1 TO 15 DEFINE GROUP 'beams' ADD MEMBERS 16 TO 27 MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53' $* ** $* ** Damping ratios for member structural $* ** stiffness damping CONSTANTS MODAL DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS MEMBERS GROUP 'beams' GROUP 'columns'

13 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
RESPONSE SPECTRUM LOAD 'RS1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X 1.0 FILE 'RS' END PERFORM RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS COMPUTE RESPONSE SPECTRUM DISPLACEMENTS OUTPUT MODAL CONTRIBUTIONS ON LIST RESPONSE SPECTRUM DISPL JOINT 16 $* ** $* ** Mode superposition transient analysis TRANSIENT LOAD ‘TH1’ TRANSLATION X FILE ‘ELCENTRO’ INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 PERFORM TRANSIENT ANALYSIS LIST TRANSIENT MAX DISPL JOINT 16 RS Analysis, 4% Uniform TH Analysis, 4% Uniform TH Analysis, No Damping

14 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
Damping Ratios (non-uniform): Beams 5%, Columns 3%, Foundation 10% TYPE PLANE FRAME XY MATERIAL STEEL OUTPUT LONG NAME UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT COORDINATES $ Name X coord Y coord $ 1 X Y 2 X Y . 18 X Y 19 X Y 20 X Y DEFINE GROUP 'support' ADD JOINTS 1 to 5 STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'support' $* ** $* ** Modal damping ratio for spring support $* ** stiffnesses JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0 DFX 0.10

15 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
$* ** $* ** Eigenvalue analysis INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 EIGENVALUE PARAMETERS SOLVE USING GTLANCZOS NUMBER OF MODES 20 PRINT MAX END DYNAMIC ANALYSIS EIGENVALUE $* ** Compute weighted average composite modal $* ** damping ratios DYNAMIC PARAMETERS RESPONSE DAMPING STIFFNESS 1.0 COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS AVERAGE $* ** Response spectrum analsis UNITS INCHES CYCLES CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM ACCELERATION LIN VS FREQUENCY LIN FILE 'RS' FREQUENCY RANGE FROM TO AT DAMPING RATIOS USE ACCELERATION TIME HISTORY FILES 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE USING DUHAMEL DIVISOR END OF CREATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM MEMBER INCIDENCES $ Name Start joint End joint $ $ Columns . DEFINE GROUP 'columns' ADD MEMBERS 1 TO 15 DEFINE GROUP 'beams' ADD MEMBERS 16 TO 27 MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53' $* ** $* ** Damping ratios for member structural $* ** stiffness damping CONSTANTS MODAL DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS MEMBERS GROUP 'beams' MODAL DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS GROUP 'columns'

16 Weighted Average Composite Modal Damping
RESPONSE SPECTRUM LOAD 'RS1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X 1.0 FILE 'RS' END PERFORM RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS COMPUTE RESPONSE SPECTRUM DISPLACEMENTS OUTPUT MODAL CONTRIBUTIONS ON LIST RESPONSE SPECTRUM DISPL JOINT 16 $* ** $* ** Mode superposition transient analysis TRANSIENT LOAD ‘TH1’ TRANSLATION X FILE ‘ELCENTRO’ INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 PERFORM TRANSIENT ANALYSIS LIST TRANSIENT MAX DISPL JOINT 16 WtAvgCMD, Non-Uniform, KFX = 50 k WtAvgCMD, Non-Uniform, KFX = 1 k

17 Rayleigh Proportional Damping

18 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Classical Damping = 5% at ω = 3.16 Hz and 100 Hz DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS E-4 MASS Non-classical Damping at ω =3.16 Hz and 100 Hz Beams and columns % Supports % CONSTANTS RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS E-4 - MEMBERS GROUP LIST 'beams‘ ‘columns’ RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO MASS MEMBERS 6 TO 20 GROUP ‘ beams’ RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO MASS MEMBERS 1 TO 5 UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT RELEASES 1 TO 5 KFX 5.0 DFX E-4

19 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Classical Damping TYPE PLANE FRAME XY MATERIAL STEEL OUTPUT LONG NAME UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT COORDINATES $ Name X coord Y coord $ 1 X Y 2 X Y . 18 X Y 19 X Y 20 X Y DEFINE GROUP 'support' ADD JOINTS 1 to 5 STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'support‘ JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0

20 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Classical Damping MEMBER INCIDENCES $ Name Start joint End joint $ $ Columns . DEFINE GROUP 'columns' ADD MEMBERS 1 TO 15 DEFINE GROUP 'beams' ADD MEMBERS 16 TO 27 MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53‘ INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 $* ** $* ** Rayleigh proportional damping for $* ** structural damping at 0.05 for $* ** w = rad/sec (3.16 Hz) and $* ** 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS E-4 MASS $* ** $* ** Perform direct integration time history $* ** analysis UNITS INCHES CYCLES TRANSIENT LOAD 'T1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X FILE ‘ELCENTRO’ INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 END DYNAMIC ANALYSIS PHYSICAL NEWMARK BETA 0.25 LIST TRANSIENT MAX DISPL JOINTS 1 16 Rayleigh Damping, Classical, Physical Analysis No Rayleigh Damping, Physical Analysis Modal TH Analysis, 5% Uniform Damping

21 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Non-classical Damping TYPE PLANE FRAME XY MATERIAL STEEL OUTPUT LONG NAME UNITS INCHES KIPS JOINT COORDINATES $ Name X coord Y coord $ 1 X Y 2 X Y . 18 X Y 19 X Y 20 X Y DEFINE GROUP 'support' ADD JOINTS 1 to 5 STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'support‘ $* ** $* ** Rayleigh damping factor for spring support $* ** stiffnesses corresponding to 15% damping in $* ** the support for w = rad/sec (3.16 Hz) and $* ** 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0 DFX E-4

22 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Non-classical Damping MEMBER INCIDENCES $ Name Start joint End joint $ $ Columns . DEFINE GROUP 'columns' ADD MEMBERS 1 TO 15 DEFINE GROUP 'beams' ADD MEMBERS 16 TO 27 MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53‘ INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 $* ** $* ** Rayleigh damping factors for joint and member $* ** inertias corresponding to 15% damping in the $* ** support and 5% elsewhere for w = rad/sec $* ** (3.16 Hz) and 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) 1 to 5 TRANSL ALL 0.5 DAMPING 6 TO 20 TRANSL ALL 0.5 DAMPING CONSTANTS RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO MASS MEMBERS 1 TO 5 RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO MASS MEMBERS 6 TO 15 GROUP 'beams' $* ** $* ** Rayleigh damping for member stiffnesses at 5% $* ** for w = rad/sec (3.16 Hz) and $* ** 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) RAYLEIGH DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS E-4 - GROUP LIST 'beams' 'columns'

23 Rayleigh Proportional Damping
Non-classical Damping $* ** $* ** Perform direct integration time history $* ** analysis UNITS INCHES CYCLES TRANSIENT LOAD 'TH1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X FILE 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 END DYNAMIC ANALYSIS PHYSICAL NEWMARK BETA 0.25 LIST TRANS MAX DISPL JOINT 1 16 Rayleigh Damping, Non-Classical, Physical Analysis Rayleigh Damping, Classical, Physical Analysis

24 The Viscous Damper Element

25 The Viscous Damper Element
MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53‘ INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 $* ** $* ** Rayleigh proportional damping for $* ** structural damping at 0.05 for $* ** w = rad/sec (3.16 Hz) and $* ** 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFNESS E-4 - MASS $* ** Viscous damper elements at supports DAMPING ELEMENT DATA 'DE1' INC 1 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE2' INC 2 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE3' INC 3 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE4' INC 4 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE5' INC 5 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 END

26 The Viscous Damper Element
$* ** $* ** Perform direct integration time history $* ** analysis UNITS INCHES CYCLES TRANSIENT LOAD 'TH1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X FILE 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 END DYNAMIC ANALYSIS PHYSICAL NEWMARK BETA 0.25 LIST TRANS MAX DISPL JOINT 16 Viscous Damping, CTX = 1.e7 lb Viscous Damping, CTX = 100 lb

27 General Composite Modal Damping

28 General Composite Modal Damping
. DEFINE GROUP 'support' ADD JOINTS 1 to 5 STATUS SUPPORT JOINT GROUP 'support' JOINT RELEASES GROUP 'support' KFX 5.0 MEMBER INCIDENCES $ Name Start joint End joint $ $ Columns MEMBER PROPERTIES GROUP 'beams' T 'WBEAM9' 'W18x35' GROUP 'columns' T 'WCOLUMN9' 'W14x53' $* ** $* ** Define damping properties for modal $* ** damping ratio computation: $* ** Rayleigh damping factors for structural $* ** damping at 0.05 for w = 19.4 rad/sec (3.16 Hz) $* ** and 635 rad/sec (100 Hz) DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFN E-4 - MASS $* ** Viscous damper elements at supports DAMPING ELEMENT DATA 'DE1' INC 1 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE2' INC 2 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE3' INC 3 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE4' INC 4 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 'DE5' INC 5 GLOBAL CTX 1.E4 END PRINT DAMPING ELEMENT DATA $* ** Eigenvalue analysis INERTIA OF JOINTS LUMPED INERTIA OF JOINTS WEIGHT EXISTING TRANSL ALL 0.5 EIGENVALUE PARAMETERS SOLVE USING GTLANCZOS NUMBER OF MODES 20 PRINT MAX DYNAMIC ANALYSIS EIGENVALUE

29 General Composite Modal Damping
$* ** $* ** Compute modal damping ratios assuming $* ** classical proportional damping COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS PROPORTIONAL INCLUDE COUPLING ALL $* ** Mode superposition transient analysis UNITS INCHES CYCLES TRANSIENT LOAD 'TH1' SUPPORT ACCELERATION TRANSLATION X FILE 'ELCENTRO' INTEGRATE FROM 0.0 TO 10.0 AT 0.01 END PERFORM TRANSIENT ANALYSIS LIST TRANSIENT MAX DISPL JOINT 16 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS PHYSICAL NEWMARK BETA 0.25 LIST TRANS MAX DISPL JOINT 16 General Composite modal damping, No CTX General Composite modal damping, CTX = 1.e7 lb General Composite modal damping, CTX = 100 lb

30 General Composite Modal Damping
DAMPING PROPORTIONAL TO STIFFN E-4 MASS COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS PROPORTIONAL

31 New Damping Models/Functions
Direct Computation of “Rayleigh” Damping Ratios Caughey Damping

32 New Damping Models/Functions
Superposition of Modal Damping Matrices

Download ppt "GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis"

Similar presentations

Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.

Module 2 Modal Analysis ANSYS Dynamics.
NONLINEAR DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS IN ZSOIL :

NONLINEAR DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS IN ZSOIL :
Analysis and Design of DuPonts Steel Framing Systems Using WinSCADS and GT STRUDL Jeffery A. Stokes, PE E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 20th Annual.

Analysis and Design of DuPonts Steel Framing Systems Using WinSCADS and GT STRUDL Jeffery A. Stokes, PE E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 20th Annual.
Passive Vibration Control

Passive Vibration Control
Tuned Mass Dampers a mass that is connected to a structure

Tuned Mass Dampers a mass that is connected to a structure
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.

Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.

MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines

Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Soil-Structure Interaction

Soil-Structure Interaction
Response Spectrum Analysis Enhancements

Response Spectrum Analysis Enhancements
Beams and Frames.

Beams and Frames.
Training Manual 001419 15 Aug 2000 3.4-1 Mode Superposition method allows non- proportional damping Block Lanczos solver enhancements Full harmonic analysis.

Training Manual Aug Mode Superposition method allows non- proportional damping Block Lanczos solver enhancements Full harmonic analysis.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis

Konstantinos Agrafiotis
GTStrudl Training … Nonlinear Geometric Analysis of Structures … Some Practical Fundamentals and Insights Michael H. Swanger Georgia Tech CASE Center June,

GTStrudl Training … Nonlinear Geometric Analysis of Structures … Some Practical Fundamentals and Insights Michael H. Swanger Georgia Tech CASE Center June,
Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum

Multi-degree-of-freedom System Shock Response Spectrum
Www.sgh.com Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)

Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
Example 4.4. No damper TMD at node 2 Tune to mode 1 modal mass =1.25 modal amplitude =1.0 Want equivalent modal damping = 0.1 Requires mbar =.065 The.

Example 4.4. No damper TMD at node 2 Tune to mode 1 modal mass =1.25 modal amplitude =1.0 Want equivalent modal damping = 0.1 Requires mbar =.065 The.
Chapter Ten Harmonic Analysis.

Chapter Ten Harmonic Analysis.
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,

1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
TWO DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEM. INTRODUCTION Systems that require two independent coordinates to describe their motion; Two masses in the system X two possible.

TWO DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEM. INTRODUCTION Systems that require two independent coordinates to describe their motion; Two masses in the system X two possible.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google