1. ATN/GNSS Seminar Varadero, Cuba 6 to 9 May 2002 GNSS spectrum and signal vulnerability issues Presentation 5.2 by V. Iatsouk, GNSS Panel Secretary ANB/ICAO

2. GNSS spectrum allocations  Current allocations  New allocations to support system enhancements and expansion  Compatibility issues

3. FREQUENCY BAND 1559 – 1610 MHz (ARNS/RNSS)  GNSS F1 signals (GPS L1, GLONASS L1, GALILEO E1/2)  Total band 1559-1610 MHz is required for current and future GNSS  Sharing with other services will cause unacceptable degradation and restrictions on GNSS elements  Additional allocation to Fixed Service (some States in Europe, Middle East, Asia and Africa) continue to exist:  On a primary basis until 2005 (or 2010)  On a secondary basis until 2015

4. Frequency Band 960 – 1215 MHz (ARNS, RNSS)  RNSS allocation as of WRC-2000  GNSS F2 frequencies  Sharing with DME on 1164 – 1215 MHz frequencies  Compatibility issues:  DME to be protected  GNSS F2 signals to operate in DME environment  Out-of-band (Radiolocation above 1 215 MHz) interference

5. Frequency band 1215 – 1300 MHz (Radiolocation, RNSS)  No aeronautical allocation  GPS L2, GLONASS L2, GALILEO E6  Used by SBAS reference receivers  Compatibility issues  Radiolocation to be protected  No protection for RNSS on a global basis

6. Frequency band 108 – 117.975 MHz (ARNS)  GBAS VDL Broadcast  Sharing with VOR and ILS  Compatibility issues:  VOR, ILS to be protected  VDL Broadcast: To operate in VOR, ILS environment Not to impose additional restrictions in adjacent bands (FM Broadcast below 108 MHz, Aeronautical Mobile above 117.975 MHz)

7. GNSS vulnerability aspects  GNSS signals’ vulnerability is generally recognized  Issues to be addressed:  Interference cases and resulting threats Operational impact Mitigations

8. Interference cases  Unintentional vs intentional  In-band vs out-of-band  On-board sources  Natural phenomena

9. Intentional interference  Jamming  Threat is valid  Risks and impacts vary significantly  Most mitigation options are suitable  Spoofing  Extent of threat appears to be low  Airborne collision avoidance, situation awareness and separation assurance capabilities are potential mitigation aids  Other mitigation options are also suitable

10. Unintentional interference  GNSS F1 signals in 1 559 – 1 610 MHz band  Fixed service (not compatible)  Mobile satellite communications (compatibility standards exist)  GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO signals above 1 215 MHz  RNSS/Radiolocation Service compatibility (studies under way)

11. Unintentional interference (cont’d)  GNSS GBAS in 108 – 117.975 MHz band  VOR (compatibility criteria available)  ILS (compatibility criteria being developed)  Aeronautical VHF Communications (compatibility criteria being developed)  FM broadcast (compatibility criteria available)  Envisaged VDL Mode 4, if allocated by WRC-2003 (compatibility studies under way)

12. Unintentional interference (cont’d)  GNSS F2 signals in 1 164 – 1 215 MHz band  Designed to be compatible with ARNS  Compatibility problems in DME high density areas (core Europe, US, Japan)  On-board compatibility  Compatibility standards exist  Addressed through aircraft systems integration

13. Natural interference sources  Ionospheric effects  Storms  Model anomalities  Scintillations impacts  Other (heavy rainfalls?)

14. Operational Impacts  Effects of interference to be assessed taking account of:  Traffic density  Navigation infrastructure  Surveillance system

15. Mitigations  Spectrum management, coordination and interference monitoring  Use of alternative navigation means  Procedural methods  Contingency planning

16. Work towards WRC - 2003  Promote cessation of fixed services in the 1559-1610 MHz band as early as possible  Finalize compatibility criteria and assessment methodology for RNSS in the 1164-1215 MHz band  Formalize GBAS operation in 108 – 117.975 MHz band

17. Conclusions Global coverage and performance to support all phases of flight are dependent upon resolution of spectrum issues States to ensure freedom of RF interference when approving GNSS operations Interference threats to be assessed and mitigation strategy to be developed as a part of GNSS implementation planning