Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado"— Presentation transcript:

1 Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado
Literature Review Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado

2 Title: Adalimumab Induction Therapy for Crohn’s Disease Previously Treated with Infliximab.
Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, et al. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;146:

3 Introduction Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:829-838.
Tumor Necrosis factor (TNF) is an important pro inflammatory cytokine seen in Crohn’s disease. Infliximab is a chimeric, anti-TNF monocolonal antibody that is effective in inducing and maintaining clinical remission in Crohn’s patients. Loss of efficacy, need for dose escalation, or infusion reactions with infliximab have been reported in upto 40% of cases (Hanauer SB, et al. Lancet. 2002;359:1541-9). Adalimumab is a new phage derived purely human TNF antagonist that has been shown to be effective in Crohn’s patients that are naive to and some patients that have lost response to or are intolerant to Infliximab. Sandborn WJ, et al conducted a prospective randomized placebo controlled trial of adalimumab for Crohn patients intolerant to or unresponsive to Infliximab.

4 Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:829-838.
Aim Determine if Adalimumab is more effective than placebo in inducing remission among patients that are intolerant or resistant to Infliximab therapy. Study Eponym: GAIN Gauging Adalimumab Efficacy in Infliximab Non-Responders

5 GAIN Study Design: Design:
Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146: GAIN Study Design: Design: 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects: 325 adults with Moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CDAI 220–450). All intolerant to or loss of response to Infliximab Stopped infliximab at least 8 weeks prior to the study Stable dose concurrent treatment allowed Treatment arms: Adalimumab: 160 mg at Week 0 and 80 mg at Week 2 Placebo at Weeks 0 and 2

6 GAIN Study Design: Fall > 100 points (significant improvement)
Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146: GAIN Study Design: Measurements: CDAI Fall > 70 points (moderate improvement) Fall > 100 points (significant improvement) Remission = CDAI < 150 points Evaluation Time Points T-2 weeks, T0, T1, T2, & T4 weeks

7 GAIN: Study Subjects Characteristics Placebo N=166 Adalimumab N=159
Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146: GAIN: Study Subjects Characteristics Placebo N=166 Adalimumab N=159 Men n (%) 65(39) 50(31) Mean age (SD),y 37(12) 39(12) Loss resp to infliximab n (%) 87(52) 77(48) Acute Reaction Infliximab 63(38) 68(43) Delay Reaction Infliximab 52(31) 43(27) HACA 60(38) 50(33)

8 GAIN: Baseline Disease Characteristics
Placebo N=166 160/80 mg N=159 Mean CDAI Score* 313 Mean IBDQ Score† 124 120 Median CRP <1 mg/dl 59% 52% Steroids 73 (44%) 55 (35%) Immunosuppressants 85 (51%) 73 (46%) 5-ASAs 60 (36%) 45 (28%) CDAI data: table run IBDQ data: table run CRP data: Table , run And run Baseline differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

9 Mean CDAI score at each visit
Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146: Mean CDAI score at each visit

10 GAIN: Efficacy Outcomes Wk 4
* * % of Patients 12/166 34/159 56/166 82/159 41/166 61/159 *P<0.001, †P<0.01, both vs. placebo. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

11 GAIN Trial Results Time CDAI Score Response Rates 4 wk
Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146: GAIN Trial Results Time CDAI Score Response Rates 4 wk CDAI Placebo Adalimumab p-value > 70 ↓ 34% 52% > 100 ↓ 25% 38% <150 (remission) 7% 21% <0.001 Remission in Adalimumab group 21% or a Δ 14.2% (95% CI, 6.7 to 21.6 percentage points)

12 GAIN: Prior Response to Infliximab
Placebo N=166 160/80 mg N=159 Prior AE to infliximab 95 (57%) 95 (60%) Acute (24 hr) 63 (38%) 68 (43%) Delayed 52 (31%) 43 (27%) Both 20 (12%) 15 ( 9%) Lost response, % 87 (53%) 77 (48%) Prior AE & lost response, % 21 (13%) 19 (12%) 691 CSR table 13; CSE table 11 Intolerant to infliximab: table run Lost response, table run (overall N for PBO=165; loss of response PBO=52.7%; used CSR/CSE data instead [n=166 for PBO; 52.4% for loss of response in PBO) Intolerant, lost response, both: table run Differences in prior response to infliximab were not statistically significant. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

13 GAIN: Patient Disposition
Placebo N=166 160/80 mg N=159 Completed, n (%) 156 (94%) 155 (98%) Withdrawn, n (%) 10 (6%) 4 (3%) Primary Reason (n) Adverse event 4 2 Protocol violation 5 1 Lack of efficacy Withdrew consent Other Table run “Other”=lost to follow-up, death, administrative reasons, other Differences between treatment groups were not statistically significant. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

14 GAIN: Efficacy Outcomes at Week 4
* * % of Patients Remission data: Stats table run Delta 70: stats table run Delta 100: stats table run 12/166 34/159 56/166 82/159 41/166 61/159 *P<0.001, †P<0.01, both vs. placebo. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

15 GAIN: Remission Rates: CDAI<150
Week % of Patients 6 4 7 * 21 Stats table run *P<0.001 vs. placebo. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

16 Response Rate 70-Point CDAI Decrease (CR-70)
* Week 21 35 52 33 34 % of Patients Delta 70: stats table run *P<0.005, †P<0.001, both vs. placebo Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

17 Week 4 Remission by Baseline Immunosuppressant (IMM) Use
6/84 16/73 18/86 6/82 Table , run Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

18 Week 4 Remission by Infliximab History
% of Patients 691 CSR table 13; CSE table 11 Loss of response data, , Intolerance data, , Loss of response and intolerance, , 7/87 15/77 5/95 21/95 0/21 3/19 Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

19 Wk 4 Remission by Baseline HACA* to Infliximab
2/58 10/48 21/105 10/101 Table , run *Human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACAs). Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

20 Conclusions 52% of Crohn’s pts no longer responsive to Infliximab at 5mg/kg clinically improved (↓ CDAI > 70 points) on Adalimumab 160/80mg and 21% of pts went into remission by 4wks. - Response to Adalimumab was not influenced by presence of HACA (+) or co-therapy with IMM. This study does NOT show that Infliximab “non- responders” will have long term response to Adalimumab. This trial did NOT directly compare efficacy of Infliximab & Adalimumab. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:

21 Reviewer Comments Infliximab “non responders” are seen in up to 40% of Crohn’s patients within a year of treatment. This study provides important information that Adalimumab is a valuable alternative for these patients. Expect 52% of Crohn’s pts that are Infliximab “non-responders” to experience improvement in CDAI > 70 pts after 4 wk of Adalimumab 160/80 mg and 21% of pts will go into remission. Sandborn WJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:


Download ppt "Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google