Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.

Published byNathan Audrey Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: " 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS."— Presentation transcript:

1  0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS

2

3

4 ,

5 Regge theory: Exchange of families of mesons in the t-channel

6

7 Regge theory: Exchange of families of mesons in the t-channel M(s,t) ~ s  (t) where  (t) (trajectory) is the relation between the spin and the (squared) mass of a family of particles M->s  (t)  tot ~1/s x Im(M(s,t=0))->s  (0)-1 [optical theorem]  tot d  /dt s t d  /dt~1/s 2 x |M(s,t)| 2 ->s  (t)-2 ->[e  (t)lns(s) ]

8 ,

9 , Q 2 >>

10 ,

11 Some signatures of the (asymptotic) « hard » processes:  L /  T ~Q 2  J  ~9/1/2/8  L ~1/Q 6  T ~1/Q 8  ~|xG(x)| 2 Q 2 dependence: W (or x B ) dependence: (for gluon handbag) Ratio of yields: (for gluon handbag) Saturation with hard scale of  P (0), b, … SCHC : checks with SDMEs

12 H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS + « older » data from: E665, NMC, Cornell,…

13 H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS + « older » data from: E665, NMC, Cornell,…

14

15 Ratios  J  ~ 9/1/2/8    1/sqrt(2){|uu>-|dd>}  1/sqrt(2){|uu>+|dd>}   Ratio  =9

16 For W>5 GeV, good indications that the “hard”/pQCD regime is reached/dominant for is reached/dominant for  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4 ~ 3-5 GeV 2. Data are relatively well described by GPD/handbag approaches Great, one can hope to learn about the gluon (transverse) spatial distribution in the nucleon, the gluon orbital momentum contribution to the nucleon spin, etc…

17 H1, ZEUS, Q 2 >> H1, ZEUS CLAS HERMES COMPASS

18 Exclusive  0,   electroproduction on the proton @ CLAS6 on the proton @ CLAS6 S. Morrow et al., Eur.Phys.J.A39:5-31,2009 (  0 @5.75GeV) J. Santoro et al., Phys.Rev.C78:025210,2008 (  @5.75GeV) L. Morand et al., Eur.Phys.J.A24:445-458,2005 (  @5.75GeV) C. Hadjidakis et al., Phys.Lett.B605:256-264,2005 (  0 @4.2 GeV) K. Lukashin et al., Phys.Rev.C63:065205,2001 (  @4.2 GeV) } e1-b (1999) } e1-6 (2001-2002) A. Fradi, Orsay Univ. PhD thesis (   @5.75 GeV) } e1-dvcs (2005) F.-X. Girod

19 Exclusive  0 electroproduction

20 e1-6 experiment (E e =5.75 GeV) (October 2001 – January 2002)

21 ep  ep  + (  - ) Mm(epX) Mm(ep  + X) e p ++  - )

22 1) Ross-Stodolsky B-W for  0 (770), f 0 (980) and f 2 (1270) with variable skewedness parameter, 2)  ++ (1232)  +  - inv.mass spectrum and  +  - phase space. Background Subtraction

23 IM(p  + )

24 IM(p  - )

25 V. Mokeev 2  e-prod model Working up to W=1.6 GeV up to Q 2 ~1 GeV 2

26

27 J-M. Laget 2  e-prod model +f 0 + f 2

28  +f 0 + f 2  all (incl.  0 ) Good description of CLAS,SLAC data Laget model: Photoproduction

29 Laget model: Electroproduction CLAS data Laget model

30 At the time of the analysis (~2008), radiative corrections were treated as averaged over M  +  -, i.e. only as a function of (x B, Q 2 ) Relatively small effect on  0 cross sections as the “distortion” of the M  +  - spectrum was “absorbed” in the effective  +  - continuum background subtraction (also ~25% syst. uncertainty was included) M  +  - (GeV) However, current more refined re-analysis of these data (B. Garillon, aimed at f 0 and f 2 analysis, see talk on Saturday) show that there is a M  +  - -dependence  f0f0 f2f2

31 1) Ross-Stodolsky B-W for  0 (770), f 0 (980) and f 2 (1270) with variable skewedness parameter, 2)  ++ (1232)  +  - inv.mass spectrum and  +  - phase space. Background Subtraction

32    (  * p  p  0 ) vs W

33 d  /dt (  * p  p  0 ) Fit by e bt Large t min ! (1.6 GeV 2 )

34 Angular distribution analysis, cos  cm Relying on SCHC (exp. check to the ~25% level)

35 Longitudinal cross section  L  (  * L p  p  L 0 )

36 Interpretation “a la Regge” : Laget model  *p  p  0  *p  p   *p  p  Free parameters: *Hadronic coupling constants: g MNN *Mass scales of EM FFs: (1+Q 2 /  2 ) -2

37 Regge/Laget  L (  * L p  p  L 0 ) Pomeron ,f 2

38 VGG GPD model +

39 GK GPD model +

40 H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) ~~ x+ξx-ξ t γ, π, ρ, ω… -2ξ x ξ-ξ-ξ +1 0 Quark distribution q q Distribution amplitude Antiquark distribution “ERBL” region“DGLAP” region W~1/  ERBLDGLAP

41 DDs + “(fitted) meson exchange” DDs w/o “meson exchange” (VGG) “(fitted) meson exchange”

42 Comparison of cross sections is model-dependent: k perp dependence ansatz, model for GPDs,…  L /  T ~Q 2  L ~1/Q 6  T ~1/Q 8 Q 2 dependence: Saturation with hard scale of b SCHC : checks with SDMEs  J  ~9/1/2/8  ~|xG(x)| 2 W (or x B ) dependence: Ratio of yields: Some signatures available for gluon handbag are not relevant for quark handbag: Model-independent features:

43 CLAS@6 GeV S. Morrow et al., Eur.Phys.J.A39:5-31,2009 (  0 @5.75GeV)

44 b (from e bt ) as a function of Q 2 (be careful of correlation with W)  L /  T as a function of Q 2 (be careful of correlation with W)

45 Exclusive    electroproduction at CLAS12 CLAS12 proposal PR12-11-103 Q 2 range at 6 GeV Q 2 range at 12 GeV

46

47    decay angular distribution (polar angle  cm ) CLAS12 proposal PR12-11-103 purely statistical error bars statistical error bars +10% systematic

48 Exclusive  electroproduction

49 ep->ep       

50 cos(  cm ) distribution  cm distribution

51 Laget Regge model for  *p  p  Cross section  (  * p  p  Laget  T +  L Laget  L VGG  L (H&E) Issue with GPD approach if  0 exchange dominant :  0 ->E E subleading in handbag for VM production (GK includes  0 exchange with k perp effects) ~ ~ while DESY data CORNELL data

52 Cross section  (  * p  p  Comparison with GPD calculation (VGG)

53 Exclusive  + electroproduction (A. Fradi’s thesis) Slow but steady progress towards publication ! towards publication !

54 ++ e  - ) (p)   One event in CLAS e p  e’ [n]    e’ [n]  +  0  e’ [n]    Channel selection IC EC

55 Invariant mass IM(  +  0 )

56 Invariant mass IM(n  0 ) Invariant mass IM(n  + )

57 Invariant mass IM(  +  0 )

58 PRELIMINARY Total cross section  Q 2,x B )  +

59 Laget Regge “hadronic” approach Laget Regge “hadronic” approach + ++ ++ ++ n ++ n GPD “partonic” approach GPD “partonic” approach +L+L H, E ρ0ρ0ρ0ρ0 e u H u - e d H d e u E u - e d E d  e u H u + e d H d e u E u + e d E d ρ+ρ+ρ+ρ+ H u - H d E u - E d

60 “Hadronic approach”: Laget model ++ 00

61 “Hadronic approach” Laget model does not reproduce the drop of d  /dt for t →0 PRELIMINARY

62 (*) “Partonic approach”: GPDs GPDs 00 VGG GPD model GK GPD model ++ GPDs p n LL  e e’e’

63 GPDs model agrees fairly with the data at low x B (high W) GPDs model misses the data at high x B (low W) (*) “Partonic approach”: GPDs Only H in this calculation

64 (*) Hint of GPD E dominance The GPD E reproduces the drop of d  /dt for t →0

65 L. Morand et al., Eur.Phys.J.A24:445-458,2005 (  @5.75GeV) C. Hadjidakis et al., Phys.Lett.B605:256-264,2005 (  0 @4.2 GeV) K. Lukashin, Phys.Rev.C63:065205,2001 (  @4.2 GeV) J. Santoro et al., Phys.Rev.C78:025210,2008 (  @5.75GeV) S. Morrow et al., Eur.Phys.J.A39:5-31,2009 (  0 @5.75GeV)     A. Fradi, Orsay Univ. PhD thesis, 2009 (   @5.75GeV) (preliminary)

66 Comparison of t-slope for    channels at 6 GeV

67 VMs (  0,  ) the only exclusive process [with DVCS] measured over a W range of 2 orders of magnitude (  L,T, d  /dt, SDMEs,…) At low energy (W<5 GeV), success of “hard” approach for the  channel ( nucleon gluon imaging) but large failure for the  0,  + channels. This is not understood. Why the GPD/handbag approach sould set at much larger Q 2 for valence quarks ? Are the widely used GPD parametrisations in the valence region completely wrong ? JLab12 PR12-11-103 proposal: broader phase space, check when Q 2 independence settles for a variety of observables At high energy (W>5 GeV), transition from “soft” to “hard” (  2 scale) physics relatively well understood (further work needed for precision understanding/extractions) handbag interpretation and nucleon imaging handbag interpretation and nucleon imaging

68 W~1/  GPDs/handbag GPDs/handbag ???

69 BACKUP SLIDES

70 H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) ~~ x+ξx-ξ t γ, π, ρ, ω… -2ξ x ξ-ξ-ξ +1 0 Quark distribution q q Distribution amplitude Antiquark distribution “ERBL” region“DGLAP” region W~1/  ERBLDGLAP

71 DDs + “meson exchange” DDs w/o “meson exchange” (VGG) “meson exchange”

72    (  * p  p  0 ) vs W

73 Regge/Laget  L (  * L p  p  L 0 ) Pomeron ,f 2

74 Exclusive  electroproduction

75 ep->ep     

76 GK  L LL Laget  T +  L W=2.9 GeV W=2.45 GeV W=2.1 GeV

77 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) 6 GeV e fixed p target Counting rates for 1000 hours at 10 34 cm -2 s -1 Limitation comes from phase space

78 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) 6 GeV e fixed p target Counting rates for 100 hours at 10 34 cm -2 s -1 Limitation comes from phase space

79 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) 11 GeV e fixed p target Counting rates for 1000 hours at 10 35 cm -2 s -1 Limitation comes from phase space

80 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) 11 GeV e fixed p target Counting rates for 1000 hours at 10 35 cm -2 s -1 Limitation comes from phase space

81 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) Counting rates for 1000 hours at 10 34 cm -2 s -1 11 GeV e 60 GeV p Limitation comes from luminosity

82 100% acceptance & integrated over all variables but (x B,Q 2 ) Counting rates for 1000 hours at 10 34 cm -2 s -1 11 GeV e 60 GeV p Limitation comes from luminosity

83

84 6 GeV e fixed p target 11 GeV e fixed p target 11 GeV e 60 GeV p

85 d  /dt (  * p  p  0 ) Fit by e bt Large t min ! (1.6 GeV 2 )

86  L (    L (    b  d  L  dt (   d  L  dt (    b  Longitudinal cross sections PRELIMINARY

87  e  e  Q ~ MeV  Q >>GeV  Increasing Q 2 : Q 2 >>

88 GPDs parametrization based on DDs (VGG/GK model) Strong power corrections… but seems to work at large W…

89 d  /dt (  * p  p  0 ) Fit by e bt Large t min ! (1.6 GeV 2 )

90 Steepening W slope as a function of Q 2 indicates « hard » regime (reflects gluon distribution in the proton) W dependence

91 Two ways to set a « hard » scale: *large Q 2 *mass of produced VM W dependence Steepening W slope as a function of Q 2 indicates « hard » regime (reflects gluon distribution in the proton) Universality :  at large Q 2 +M V 2 similar to J/ 

92  P (0) increases from “soft” (~1.1) to “hard” (~1.3) as a function of scale  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4. Hardening of W distributions with  2

93 Approaching handbag prediction of n=6 (Q 2 not asymptotic, fixed W vs fixed x B,  tot vs  L, Q 2 evolution of G(x)…) Q 2 dependence  L ~  /Q 6 => Fit with  ~1/(Q 2 +M V 2 ) n Q 2 >0 GeV 2 => n=2+/- 0.01 Q 2 >10 GeV 2 => n=2.5+/- 0.02 Q 2 >0 GeV 2 => n=2.486 +/- 0.08 +/-0.068  J  (S. Kananov) Q 2 dependence is damped at low Q 2 and steepens at large Q 2

94 t dependence b decreases from “soft” (~10 GeV -2 ) to “hard” (~4-5 GeV -2 ) as a function of scale  2 =(Q 2 +M V 2 )/4

95 Ratios  J  ~ 9/1/2/8    1/sqrt(2){|uu>-|dd>}  1/sqrt(2){|uu>+|dd>}   Ratio  =9

96 L/TL/TL/TL/T (almost) compatible with handbag prediction (damping at large Q 2 )

97 SDMEs HERMES H1 (almost) no SCHC violation

98 HERMES Cornell CLAS

99 LL ep->ep      GK  L CLAS HERMES HERA

100 Exclusive  electroproduction: gluon imaging of the proton x<0.01: measured at H1/ZEUS x>0.1: practically unknown:  with CLAS12

101 (A. Kubarovsky’s simulations) Extract t–slope of d  L /dt up to Q 2 ~7 GeV2 As a function of Q 2 : check when Q 2 -independence settles As a function of x B (or W): first 3D-gluon imaging at large x Exclusive  electroproduction: gluon imaging of the proton CLAS12 proposal PR12-11-103:

102 C. Weiss:

103 LO (w/o kperp effect) Handbag diagram calculation needs k perp effects to account for preasymptotic effects LO (with kperp effect) Same thing for 2-gluon exchange process

Download ppt " 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS."

Similar presentations

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Slides by Malek MAZOUZ June 21 st 2007 Physics case n-DVCS experimental setup Analysis method Results.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Slides by Malek MAZOUZ June 21 st 2007 Physics case n-DVCS experimental setup Analysis method Results.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.

Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.

q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.
DVCS at JLab Como, 11/06/2013. JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program.

DVCS at JLab Como, 11/06/2013. JLab published 6 GeV results JLab 6GeV analysis in progress JLab 12 GeV program.
Onset of Scaling in Exclusive Processes Marco Mirazita Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati First Workshop on Quark-Hadron.

Onset of Scaling in Exclusive Processes Marco Mirazita Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati First Workshop on Quark-Hadron.
 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.

 0, ,  + exclusive electroproduction on the proton at CLAS on the proton at CLAS.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.

QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
1 Exclusive electroproduction of the    on the proton at CLAS  Outline: Physics motivations: GPDs CLAS experiment: e1-dvcs Data analysis:   cross.

1 Exclusive electroproduction of the    on the proton at CLAS  Outline: Physics motivations: GPDs CLAS experiment: e1-dvcs Data analysis:   cross.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = 1519.5 ± 1.0 MeV [a]

 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May 23 2008 Goals of this parallel.

Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
Nov 13, 2007Aharon Levy - Oxford seminar1 Gluons in the proton and exclusive hard diffraction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University and DESY Introduction soft,

Nov 13, 2007Aharon Levy - Oxford seminar1 Gluons in the proton and exclusive hard diffraction Aharon Levy Tel Aviv University and DESY Introduction soft,
Backward meson production at CLAS Alex Kubarovsky (RPI/Uconn) Kyungseon Joo (Uconn) Valery Kubarovsky (Jlab) Paul Stoler (RPI) Exclusive Meson Production.

Backward meson production at CLAS Alex Kubarovsky (RPI/Uconn) Kyungseon Joo (Uconn) Valery Kubarovsky (Jlab) Paul Stoler (RPI) Exclusive Meson Production.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December 12-2012 WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.

The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,

Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, 2003 - 1 Mónica Luisa Vázquez.

Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.

Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
M.Garçon, M. Guidal, C. Hadjidakis, K. Lukashin, L. Morand, S. Morrow, J. Santoro, E. Smith Exclusive  0,  electroproduction on the CLAS on.

M.Garçon, M. Guidal, C. Hadjidakis, K. Lukashin, L. Morand, S. Morrow, J. Santoro, E. Smith Exclusive  0,  electroproduction on the CLAS on.
Real Compton Scattering from the Proton in the Hard Scattering Regime Alan M. Nathan SLAC Experimental Seminar December 2, 2003 I. Compton Scattering from.

Real Compton Scattering from the Proton in the Hard Scattering Regime Alan M. Nathan SLAC Experimental Seminar December 2, 2003 I. Compton Scattering from.
Generalized Parton Distribution JLab Franck Sabatié CEA Saclay On behalf of the Hall A and Hall B collaborations APS-DNP mini workshop Newport.

Generalized Parton Distribution JLab Franck Sabatié CEA Saclay On behalf of the Hall A and Hall B collaborations APS-DNP mini workshop Newport.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Pseudoscalar Meson Electroproduction with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google