1. A: From Monarchy to Republic B: From Republic to Monarchy C: The Consolidation of Charles II reign D: Succession Crisis and Glorious Revolution Essay Title Mark out of 45/ 45 GRADE Teacher’s Comment Student’s Target LEVEL, GRADE and MARKS Understanding the Question Own KnowledgeAnalysis and Synoptic Links between ideas, arguments and information JudgementAwareness of Historical Interpretations Quality of language and structure Level 3 16-25 Marks GRADES E D C 17 20 24 Shows good relevant and appropriately selected evidence which may lack depth some analysis and some synoptic links – may not be highly developed OccasionalSome understanding clearly expressed and reasonable organisation Level 4 26-37 Marks GRADES B A A* 28 32 36 Good carefully selected range of precise evidence mostly analytical with some synoptic links sustained argument shows understanding of interpretations and may refer to historical debate well-organised and display good skills of written communication Level 5 38-45 MarksVery Good wide-ranging and carefully chosen evidence sustained & convincing analysis, linking arguments and evidence; a high level of synopticity; conceptual depth independent judgement; mature historical understanding a well-developed understanding of interpretations and debate well-structured and fluently written NAME: AS RESULT: TARGET GRADE: LAST ESSAY GRADE:

2. A: From Monarchy to Republic B: From Republic to Monarchy C: The Consolidation of Charles II reign D: Succession Crisis and Glorious Revolution Essay Title Mark out of 45/ 45 GRADE Teacher’s Comment Student’s Target LEVEL, GRADE and MARKS Understanding the Question Own KnowledgeAnalysis and Synoptic Links between ideas, arguments and information JudgementAwareness of Historical Interpretations Quality of language and structure Level 1 GRADE E 1-6 marks LimitedEITHER Some descriptive material OR a little accurate and relevant material EITHER loose links to question OR addresses only part of the question OR some comment but few, if any, synoptic links little if anylittle, if any, awarenesslimited in development skills of written communication weak Level 2 GRADE D 7-15 marks SomeEITHER descriptive material OR limited relevant factual material EITHER primarily descriptive OR explicit comment with limited support and undeveloped synoptic links Somelimited, debate described rather than used coherent but weakly expressed and/or poorly structured Level 3 GRADE C/B 16-25 Marks Shows good relevant and appropriately selected evidence which may lack depth some analysis and some synoptic links – may not be highly developed OccasionalSome understanding clearly expressed and reasonable organisation Level 4 GRADE B/A 26-37 Marks Good carefully selected range of precise evidence mostly analytical with some synoptic links sustained argument shows understanding of interpretations and may refer to historical debate well-organised and display good skills of written communication Level 5 GRADE A/A* 38-45 Marks Very Good wide-ranging and carefully chosen evidence sustained & convincing analysis, linking arguments and evidence; a high level of synopticity; conceptual depth independent judgement; mature historical understanding a well-developed understanding of interpretations and debate well-structured and fluently written NAME: AS RESULT: TARGET GRADE: LAST ESSAY GRADE:

3. A: From Monarchy to Republic B: From Republic to Monarchy C: The Consolidation of Charles II reign D: Succession Crisis and Glorious Revolution LEVEL, GRADE and MARKS Understanding the Question Own KnowledgeAnalysis and Synoptic Links between ideas, arguments and information JudgementAwareness of Historical Interpretations Quality of language and structure Level 1 GRADE E 1-6 marks LimitedEITHER Some descriptive material OR a little accurate and relevant material EITHER loose links to question OR addresses only part of the question OR some comment but few, if any, synoptic links little if anylittle, if any, awarenesslimited in development skills of written communication weak Level 2 GRADE D 7-15 marks SomeEITHER descriptive material OR limited relevant factual material EITHER primarily descriptive OR explicit comment with limited support and undeveloped synoptic links Somelimited, debate described rather than used coherent but weakly expressed and/or poorly structured Level 3 GRADE C/B 16-25 Marks Shows good relevant and appropriately selected evidence which may lack depth some analysis and some synoptic links – may not be highly developed OccasionalSome understanding clearly expressed and reasonable organisation Level 4 GRADE B/A 26-37 Marks Good carefully selected range of precise evidence mostly analytical with some synoptic links sustained argument shows understanding of interpretations and may refer to historical debate well-organised and display good skills of written communication Level 5 GRADE A/A* 38-45 Marks Very Good wide-ranging and carefully chosen evidence sustained & convincing analysis, linking arguments and evidence; a high level of synopticity; conceptual depth independent judgement; mature historical understanding a well-developed understanding of interpretations and debate well-structured and fluently written NAME: AS RESULT: TARGET GRADE: LAST ESSAY GRADE: Essay Title WHAT LEVEL WOULD I AVERAGE MYSELF AT? WHAT GRADE DOES THIS MEAN? WHAT DO I THINK I DID WELL – WHAT DID I NOT DO SO WELL? WHAT WERE MY TIMINGS LIKE?