Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CALGB 9741 A Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense vs Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential vs Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CALGB 9741 A Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense vs Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential vs Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant."— Presentation transcript:

1 CALGB A Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense vs Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential vs Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer Citron M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:

2 C9741—Protocol 2X2 Factorial Design q3wk q2wk + Filgrastim SEQUENTIAL
24 wk “Seq Q2” 36 wk “Seq Q3” CONCURRENT 16 wk “Con Q2” 24 wk “Con Q3” Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 h With Permission from Citron M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:

3 C9741—Major Toxicities Seq q3 Seq q2 Con q3 Con q2 No. treated 484 493
501 495 No. with detailed data 103 101 104 Granulocytes < 0.5/µL 24% 3% 43% 9% Febrile neutropenia, hospitalized 2% 6% Red cell transfusion 0% 4% 13% Platelet transfusion Neurologic: severe sensory loss or motor weakness 5% 7% Citron M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21: Erratum published in J Clin Oncol, 2003;21:2226.

4 C9741—Disease-Free Survival by Dose Density
By Density 1.0 q 2 0.8 q 3 0.6 Proportion Disease-Free q2wk N = 988 Events = 136 q3wk N = 985 Events = 179 0.4 0.2 RR = 0.74; P = .010 0.0 1 2 3 4 Years from Study Entry With permission from Citron M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:

5 Cox Model—Retrospective Analysis of Dose Density (q2) Therapy by ER Status in C9741
ER = estrogen receptor; DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival Courtesy of Marc Citron, MD. With permission from C. Hudis, MD.

6 C9741—DFS by Dose Density at Median 5-Year Follow-up
1.0 0.9 q2wk 0.8 0.7 q3wk 0.6 Disease-Free Survival 0.5 0.4 0.3 Q2 n = 988 Events = 230 Q3 n = 984 Events = 278 P = .012 0.2 0.1 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year Hudis C, et al San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Abstract 41. With permission from C. Hudis, MD.

7 C9741—DFS by ER Status and Dose Density at 5-Year Median
1.0 0.9 ER+ q2wk 0.8 ER+ q3wk 0.7 0.6 ER- q2wk Disease-Free Survival 0.5 ER- q3wk 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Year ER+ q2 n = 636 Events = ER- q2 n = 336 Events = 99 ER+ q3 n = 639 Events = ER- q3 n = 327 Events = 127 P = NS P = .014 ER = estrogen receptors With permission from Hudis C, et al San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Abstract 41.

8 Dose-Dense Chemotherapy-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity
Courtesy of Marc Citron, MD.

9 Accelerated vs Standard FEC Regimen GONO-MIG1 Protocol
FEC14 = q2wk (w/G-CSF) for 10 wk FEC21 = q3wk for 15 wk F = fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 E = epirubicin 60 mg/m2 C = cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Accrued N = 1214 10.4 yr median follow-up 359 events Venturini M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:

10 Accelerated vs Standard FEC Regimen GONO-MIG1 Results
No significant differences in: • Event-free survival - HR for FEC14/FEC21 = 0.88, 95% CI (0.71–1.08) P =.219 • Risk of death - HR for FEC14/FEC21 = 0.87, 95% CI (0.67–1.13) P = .293 Toxicity FEC14 FEC21 Asthenia 36% 29% Anemia 38% 19% Bone pain 33% 4% Leukopenia 12% 45% FEC = fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; HR = hazard ratio. Venturini M, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:

11 GONO-MIG1—Accelerated FEC Provides No Significant Benefit for HER2 Negative
EFS OS HER2 negative HER2 negative 92% 100 100 90 82% 90 91% 80 80 81% 70 70 60 60 50 50 % Event Free % SURVIVAL 40 40 FEC21 FEC21 30 30 20 20 HR = 0.91 (0.65–1.27) P = .57 10 FEC14 HR = 0.79 (0.49–1.28) p = .34 10 FEC14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years Years No. at risk No. at risk FEC14 320 309 286 266 235 179 105 52 16 1 FEC14 320 318 314 308 297 244 161 92 31 FEC21 308 297 281 247 227 178 107 52 16 FEC21 308 307 303 296 286 233 160 92 37 1 GONO-MIG1 = Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo; FEC = fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; EFS = event-free survival; OS = overall survival. With permission from Del Mastro L, et al. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:7-14.

12 GONO-MIG1—Accelerated FEC Showed Trend Toward Benefit for HER2 Positive
EFS OS HER2 positive HER2 positive 100 100 90% FEC21 90 90 78% FEC21 80 80 70 FEC14 70 75% 60 FEC14 63% 60 50 50 Eent Free (%) Survival (%) 40 40 30 30 20 20 HR = 0.54 (0.27–1.11) P = .092 HR = 0.59 (0.25–1.37) P = .22 10 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Years Years No. at risk No. at risk FEC14 50 50 44 39 33 27 15 10 5 FEC14 50 50 50 47 46 39 23 14 5 FEC21 53 48 41 32 31 23 16 7 2 FEC21 53 52 47 45 42 33 20 9 4 GONO-MIG1 = Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo; FEC = fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; EFS = event-free survival; OS = overall survival. With permission from Del Mastro L, et al. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:7-14.


Download ppt "CALGB 9741 A Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense vs Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential vs Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google