Presentation on theme: "Researching Deaf Children’s Literacy Prof Terezinha Nunes Deborah Evans Danny Bell Addy Gardner Dr Diana Burman University of Oxford Winner of the 2006."— Presentation transcript:
Researching Deaf Children’s Literacy Prof Terezinha Nunes Deborah Evans Danny Bell Addy Gardner Dr Diana Burman University of Oxford Winner of the 2006 Michael Young Research Prize ESRC Research Methods Festival St Catherine’s College, Oxford Thursday 3 rd July 2008
Deafness One in 1,000 babies born in the UK each year is deaf Only 2% of deaf school leavers are able to read at their appropriate age level 98% leave school functionally illiterate WHY?
Literacy Learning Writing is the written form of the spoken word Congenitally deaf children have never accurately heard words spoken Therefore they are unable to think in words in their head Therefore deaf children find reading and writing very challenging
National Curriculum No writing assessments exist Writing Assessment for measuring deaf BSL users Level 1. early attempts at English literacy. Pupils’ writing communicates meaning through simple words and phrases. In their reading of their writing, pupils begin to show awareness of how full stops are used. Letters are usually clearly shaped and correctly orientated.
The Problem Criteria used to measure writing progress in hearing children are inadequate for many deaf children. Assessments for writing samples of hearing children start at a level in advance of writing samples of many deaf children
Aims To develop a teaching programme for deaf primary school children to improve their literacy To devise literacy assessments 1. To monitor their progress in literacy 2. To provide a framework for teachers
Grammatical and morphological differences between BSL and English There is not always a one to one correspondence between a word and a sign (e.g. ‘up until now’). Sentence structures vary (e.g. boy play where?). BSL expresses interrogative and negative through non-manual features. BSL does not use tenses to denote time. Plurality in BSL is denoted by quantity; the noun remains the same. BSL does not contain many function or content words – to/at; is/was; nor the definite or indefinite article – the/a.
Fingerspelling Fingerspelling is where each alphabetic letter is represented by a hand and finger configuration It has been developed by hearing educators in an attempt to bridge sign- language with written language It has to be taught to deaf children as a pre-curser to literacy
is important for literacy learning, but so are Morphemes these are units of meaning rather than units of sound Some spellings appear irregular from their letter sounds, but are regular in their units of meaning magician = magic + ian Phonological awareness
Morphemes in English Morphemes have a fixed spelling Morphemes are related to grammar ‘er’ is used to make person words from verbs (read-reader) ‘ian’ is used to make person words from nouns (magic- magician) Analyzing words into morphemes helps children break long words into smaller units, accessible to visual coding - unbreakable = unbreakable Visual coding is used more by deaf than hearing children to remember spellings of words
Hypothesis If taught, deaf children could learn to use morphemes to spell English words, to decode English words in reading, and to help them plan writing because of the important connections between morphemes and English grammar.
The Teaching Programme targeted morphemes from 11 English classifications: 1. Plurals ‘s’ ‘windows’ 2.Regular past tense ‘-ed’ ‘jumped’ 3. 3 rd person singular ‘Now Sophie walks’ 4. Person words ‘-er’ ‘teacher’ 5. Person words‘-ist’ ‘artist’
We must look after our environment We vote for people to govern We measure rooms The grey paving stones The teacher said, “Punctuate this sentence” The cat ate to his satisfaction with the correct punctuation. to find out the exact measurement. he went to sleep satisfied. those people form our government. made a grey pavement. by reducing pollution.
Post-test results of Reading Comprehension controlling for age, IQ and pre-test scores
Writing Assessment Initially 35 children were invited to write about the same 4-picture sequence story at pre-test and post-test.
Scoring Six experienced teachers of the deaf ranked the deaf children’s writing productions into 5 bands. These represented knowledge of written English - Band ‘E’ (the weakest) to Band ‘A’ (the strongest).
Band E ( Children may not understand that writing is a form of communication based on an oral/aural communication system) Demonstrate an ability to: Place words the correct way up in order to copy-write Write some alphabetic letters in sequence to resemble words Memorise some fingerspelling configurations and their corresponding written letter Produced letter sequences for isolated words, which may/may not be relevant
Band D & Band C Appear to understand that writing is a communication system Produce some letter sequences to form relevant words, with some obscure spellings Write words in BSL order, with emerging English syntax Band C Place words in a more coherent order with greater awareness of English syntax
Band B and Band A Band B Transcribe BSL into English Follow through characterisation with an action (e.g. ‘he pack a clohes for to go to hoilday’ / ‘he finish he carried bag’) Band A Produce sufficient English syntax for coherent communication
The correlations between the six teachers scores were high and significant (between r = 0.57 and r = 0.94, p<0.001; n = 32). These Bands of writing profiles therefore provide a reliable instrument that can be used by teachers of the deaf for both assessment and progression in teaching. Reliability
A further study involved supported by The Nuffield Foundation involved: 257 deaf children Spread across the UK
Dissemination Michael Young Prize 2006 BBC Woman’s Hour 1. Raised awareness of the link between deaf ness and literacy 2. Many private individuals and professionals in the UK contacted me seeking further details of the research
Dissemination Michael Young Prize 2006 National Conferences 1. Teachers of the Deaf 2. Parents of deaf children 3. Professionals
Dissemination Michael Young Prize 2006 National Conferences Edinburgh Troon
National Conferences (contd.) ManchesterCoventry
National Conferences (contd.) Nottingham Reading