1. 1 March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

2. 2 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

3. 3 SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 14 MEETING  Discussed results of round one open houses  Presented results of model calibration  Identified projected deficiencies on existing plus committed network  Discussed revenue outlook  Requested TAC input on projects and priorities  Discussed next steps and schedule  Conducted TAC roundtable March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

4. 4 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

5. 5 STUDY PROGRESS TO DATE  Prepared and distributed draft travel model documentation  Prepared and distributed draft TM 2 – Title VI and MAP-21  Received TAC input on project priorities  Prepared preliminary financial forecasts  Drafted RTP table of contents and introductory text  Continued work on RTP elements March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

6. 6 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

7. 7 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION  Socio-economic data/TAZ structure  Transportation roadway network  External trip matrices  Transit trip matrix  TAC comments due March 22, 2013 March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

8. 8 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

9. 9 TITLE VI OVERVIEW  Required for federally funded project  Identifies underserved populations and ensures opportunities for involvement/input  Guards against adverse impacts  TAC comments due March 22, 2013 March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

10. 10 MAP-21 PROGRAM CATEGORIES  Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)  Metropolitan Planning  National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)  Surface Transportation Program (STP)  Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)  Railway-Highway Crossings  Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

11. 11 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and SAFETEA-LU/MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

12. 12 TAC INPUT ON ROADWAY PRIORITIES  Received feedback from one TAC member on 2014- 2018 project priorities, some extend beyond 2018  A proposed approach to project priorities  Responsive to regional needs and recent studies  Responsive to MAP-21 elements  Responsive to performance criteria  Responsive to funding availability  Projects organized by buckets for TAC review March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

13. 13 2037 CONGESTED ROADWAYS March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

14. 14 REGIONAL NEEDS AND RECENT STUDIES  Start with funded/unfunded projects in last RTP update  Supplement with recent studies  YMPO HSIP Study (2013)  San Luis SATS (2009)  Somerton PARA (2013)  Wellton PARA (2011)  Yuma Expressway PARA (2012)

15. 15 REGIONAL NEEDS AND RECENT STUDIES  Supplement with recent studies  Cocopah PARA (2012)  YCAT PARA (2012)  YMPO Rail Study (2013)  Yuma County Foothills PARA (2012)  ADOT San Luis Binational Study (2013)  ADOT Border Master Plan (2012)

16. 16 RTP ELEMENTS  Roadway system  Intelligent transportation systems (ITS)  Safety  Congestion management  Bridges and railroad grade separations  Transit  Bicycle and pedestrian  Travel demand management March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

17. 17 RTP ELEMENTS  Freight  Inland ports, warehousing, distribution centers  Aviation  Border infrastructure  Transportation security  Trade and tourism  Economic development  Air quality March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

18. 18 MAP-21 EVALUATION CRITERIA  Safety  Infrastructure condition  Congestion reduction  System reliability  Freight movement and economic vitality  Environmental sustainability  Reduced project delivery delays March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

19. 19 2013 ESTIMATED REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting SourceAnnual Amount Yuma County HURF$9,000,000 Yuma County VLT$1,000,000 City of Yuma HURF$6,000,000 City of Yuma Road Tax$3,000,000 City of San Luis HURF$2,000,000 City of Somerton HURF$1,000,000 Town of Wellton HURF$200,000 ADOT$10,000,000 TOTAL$32,200,000

20. 20 2013 ESTIMATED REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting SourceAnnual Amount Yuma County HURF$2,000,000 Yuma County VLT$1,000,000 City of Yuma Road Tax$2,000,000 ADOT$10,000,000 Federal Grants (STP, HSIP, BR, TA, CDBG, etc.) $3,000,000 Developer Participation$3,000,000 TOTAL$21,000,000

21. 21 PROJECT BUCKETS  Congestion relief  Safety  System preservation  Multi-modal enhancement  Economic development  Unfunded March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

22. 22 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and SAFETEA-LU/MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

23. 23 RTP STYLE AND FORMAT  Promotes the region, easy-to-read, attractive  Themes  Working together, moving forward  YMPO region cross-roads  History, culture, bi-state, bi-national  MAP-21 compliant  Table of contents/introductory chapter style guide March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

24. 24 RTP 2014-2037: PROPOSED STYLE GUIDE

25. 25 RTP 2014-2037: PROPOSED STYLE GUIDE

26. 26 RTP 2014-2037: PROPOSED STYLE GUIDE

27. 27 RTP 2014-2037: PROPOSED STYLE GUIDE

28. 28 RTP 2014-2037: PROPOSED STYLE GUIDE

29. 29 RTP 2014-2027 STYLE GUIDE

30. 30 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and SAFETEA-LU/MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

31. 31 NEXT STEPS  Evaluate alternatives  Perform air quality conformity analyses  Prepare RTP elements  Schedule TAC meeting 6 and next round of open houses March 14, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

32. 32 AGENDA  Call to order  Summary of February RTP TAC meeting  Study progress  Draft travel demand model documentation  Draft TM 2: Title VI and SAFETEA-LU/MAP-21  RTP alternatives  RTP Format  Next steps  Roundtable discussion March 14, 2012YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting