1. 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources AUTHORITYAUTHORITY Who is the author? What are their credentials?

2. 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources ACCURACYACCURACY How correct is the information? Is the site professional or sloppy? Was it updated recently? Is the author listed? What is the URL domain name?

3. 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources COVERAGECOVERAGE Does the site provide the information that you need?

4. 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources OBJECTIVITYOBJECTIVITY Is the information balanced and not biased? What documentation did the author provide in the way of bibliography and /or links?

5. 5 Criteria for Evaluating Sources 1-27-11 The members of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission split along party lines and wrote three competing reports. But their reports differ more in style than in substance.Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission First, the stats. The report from the Democratic majority over 500 pages long. Number of footnotes: 6,711. The main minority report, from three dissenting Republicans just 26 pages long. Number of footnotes: Nine. Both reports, of course, seek to explain the causes of the financial crisis that plunged the world into recession. But the majority report reads a lot like a book, and a bit of a potboiler at that. CURRENCY When was the site last updated ?