Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Letrozole versus hMG in intrauterine insemination cycles

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Letrozole versus hMG in intrauterine insemination cycles"— Presentation transcript:

1 Letrozole versus hMG in intrauterine insemination cycles
H. Jamal; H. Serdaroglu; A. Baysoy; E. Karatekeli; E. Attar; H. Ozornek Istanbul, Turkey

2 Aromatase Inhibitors i-Steroid group: Exemestane
ii-Non-Steroid imidazole group: Fadrozole. iii-Non-Steroid triazole group: Anastrazole, letrozole

3 letrozole letrozole reversible

4 Increasing intraovarian
Increases endogenous production of FSH Enhances ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation Suppressing estrogen Increasing intraovarian androgen levels

5 Advantages of third-generation aromatase inhibitors
Extremely potent inhibition of aromatase Very specific inhibition of aromatase without significant inhibition of other steroidogenesis enzymes Oral administration 100% bioavailability after oral administration Rapid clearance from the body (short half-life, ~ 45 hours) No accumulation of the medications or their metabolites No significant active metabolites Few mild adverse effects with high tolerability when given chronically Few contraindications or drug interactions Relatively inexpensive

6 Indications Breast cancer Endometrial cancer Endometriosis
uterine fibroids a) Unexplained infertility b) PCO c) Poor responders Ovulation induction

7 IUI Human reproduction Mitwally et al. 2003 Clinical pregnancy rate
25 20 15 Clinical pregnancy rate 19.1% 10 18.7% 10.5% 5 FSH-only Letrozole- FSH CC-FSH

8 IUI Fertility and Sterility Healey et al. 2003 Clinical pregnancy rate
25 20 15 Clinical pregnancy rate 21.6% 20.9% 10 5 FSH FSH+Letrozole

9 Objective A prospective randomized study comparing the results of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women undergoing ovulation induction with either letrozole or Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (hMG).

10 Letrozole group IUI hMG group

11 LETROZOLE GROUP(40 CASES)
80 couples regular menstrual cycles LETROZOLE GROUP(40 CASES) primary infertility female age <36 years hMG GROUP(40 CASES) All patients diagnosed as having unexplained infertility (lack of conception after at least 2 year of regular unprotected intercourse)

12 Transvaginal ultrasound
Hormone profiles Semen analysis Hysterosalpingogram and/or Laparoscopy normal normal

13 Letrozole & hMG OHSS and multiple pregnancy length of follicular phase
endometrial thickness clinical pregnancy rate Letrozole & hMG 14 mm follicles cost premature LH surge

14 LH-surge was defined as an over mean of preceding two days.
increase in LH level ≥100% over mean of preceding two days.

15 Letrozole vs hMG Letrozole 2x1 hMG hMG 1x75ıu (<30 years)
Day Day 7 Day Day 7 HCG Letrozole 2x1 hMG 1x75ıu (<30 years) hMG hMG 1x150ıu(30years)

16 IUI was performed by the same physician for all patients.
No luteal support was given.

17 RESULTS hMG Letrozole (n=40) (n=40) Age (yrs)
Duration of infertility (yrs) baseline FSH (IU/l) baseline LH (IU/l) baselin E2 (pg/ml) Letrozole (n=40) 27.22±5.5 5.3±2.1 6.41±2.6 4.81±4.5 39.54±12.0 hMG (n=40) 28.1±4.3 5.9±3.2 6.11±1.7 5.29±2.1 41.74±13.4 P: NS

18 Semen parameters before preparation for insemination
RESULTS Semen parameters before preparation for insemination Letrozole [40] 31.43±4.1 63.9 ± 41.3 59.7 ± 16.1 52.9 ± 11.3 hMG [40] 30.10±5.9 66.3 ± 44.4 62.4 ± 15.3 54.1 ± 9.2 P value NS Age of male partner (yrs) Concentration (x106/ml) Motility (%) Normal sperm forms (%)

19 RESULTS hMG Letrozole 11.90±1.7 12.77±1.9 NS 3.21±1.6 1.79±1.3
10.05±2.9 95.6% 875.15±368 2 Letrozole 12.77±1.9 1.79±1.3 8.91±1.8 93.3% 193.19±80 2 P value NS <0.001 Follicular phase (days) Follicle number Endometrial thickness(mm) Trilaminar pattern HCG day E2 Premature luteinization

20 RESULTS hMG 15 % 1(twin) 1(moderate) P value NS Letrozole 17.5%
1(triplet) Pregnancy rate Multiple pregnancy OHSS

21 The mean dose of hMG (mean number of ampoules/cycle) was 15
The mean dose of hMG (mean number of ampoules/cycle) was 15.5 ampoules/cycle. While the dose of letrozole were stable (10 tablets/cycle). Letrozole had a cost of 43 $ per cycle while hMG was more costly with 225 $ per cycle.

22 Conclusion Although low estradiol levels and less number of mature follicles were obtained at the time of the hCG in the letrozole group, pregnancy rates were similar in both groups.

23 Conclusion Another outcome we noticed that the stimulation time lasted longer in the letrozole group. As other authors cited before that this longer time of stimulation may have beneficial effects on oocyte maturation and oocyte quality and this is maybe a reason that more pregnancies occured in the letrozole group. Use of Neuroanatomy has been one of the most venerable methods of identifying the location of damage and it’s out come - Gall & phrenology Staining uses brains preserved in formalin - and stained using an enzyme Useful for identifying functional connections Neuroanatomy essentially divided into 2 areas - Gross neuroanatomy - (eg Brodmann) Fine neuorantomy (eg histology) Neurophysiology Electrical stimulation (eg Penfield) Single cell recordings Lesions (eg Experimental Ablation)

24 Conclusion Despite significantly lower E2 levels in the letrozole-treated women, endometrial development was unaffected, endometrial thickness and pattern were similar in both groups.

25 Conclusion Serious complications (OHSS, multiple pregnancy) were rare in the two groups. Low estradiol levels and less number of mature follicles at the time of the hCG in the letrozole group may be a reason to minimize and thereby avoid the complications of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancy. But to compare such an outcome, a large study including a very large number of patients must be required.

26 letrozole efficient cost effective simple and convenient

27 Thanks!


Download ppt "Letrozole versus hMG in intrauterine insemination cycles"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google